Docket

22826

Stephen William Osolin v. Her Majesty the Queen

(British Columbia) (Criminal) (By Leave)

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

Proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
1997-09-09 Appeal closed
1994-07-11 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Court of Appeal of BC enclosing their records
1994-01-18 Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, A.G. of Canada (Ottawa, ON)
1994-01-18 Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Burke-Robertson (Ottawa, ON)
1994-01-18 Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON)
1994-01-18 Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Noël, Berthiaume, Aubry & Ass. (Hull, QC)
1994-01-18 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties, British Columbia (Vancouver)
1993-12-16 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Noël, Berthiaume, Aubry & Ass. (Hull, QC)
1993-12-16 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON)
1993-12-16 Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ LaF L'HD So G Co McL Ia Ma, The appeal is allowed and a new trial ordered on the ground that the trial judge erred in failing to allow the cross-examination of the complainant on her medical records, La Forest, L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier and McLachlin JJ. dissenting. (for answers to Constitutional Questions, see file)
Allowed, no order as to costs
1993-12-16 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Burke-Robertson (Ottawa, ON)
1993-12-16 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Attorney General of Canada (Ottawa, ON)
1993-07-13 General proceeding, transcripts received and distributed to the judges (123 pages)
1993-07-12 Close file on Leave
1993-07-05 Order on motion to extend time, to file his factum to May 18/93
1993-06-17 Hearing of the appeal, 1993-06-17, CJ LaF L'HD So G Co McL Ia Ma
Decision reserved
1993-06-17 General proceeding, 10 copies of (EVIDENTIARY FOUNDATION FOR THE DEFENCE OF MISTAKEN BELIEF - GIVEN IN COURT BY THE APPELLANT)
1993-06-15 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file their factum to June 10, 1993., Reg
Granted, no order as to costs
1993-06-15 Hearing of motion to extend time, 1993-06-15, to serve and file their factum to June 10, 1993., Reg
1993-06-15 Submission of motion to extend time, 1993-06-15, to serve and file their factum to June 10, 1993., Reg
1993-06-15 Supplemental document, CASE ON APPEAL 24 copies Stephen William Osolin
1993-06-14 Response to motion to extend time, to file the intervener's factum to May 10, 1993 Her Majesty the Queen
1993-06-14 Response to motion to extend time, to file the intervener's factum to June 10, 1993 Stephen William Osolin
1993-06-14 Book of authorities, 10 copies, with service Attorney General for Ontario
1993-06-11 Book of authorities, 10 copies, with service Attorney General of Canada
1993-06-10 Affidavit, to file the intervener's factum to May 10, 1993, with service Attorney General for Ontario
1993-06-10 Motion to extend time, to file the intervener's factum to May 10, 1993, with service Attorney General for Ontario
1993-06-10 Intervener's factum, 24 copies, with service Attorney General for Ontario
1993-06-09 Book of authorities, 10 copies of vol. 1 and 2 Stephen William Osolin
1993-06-03 Trial court record, (faxed copy of indictment only)
1993-06-02 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file their factum to May 18, 1993., Reg
Granted, no order as to costs
1993-06-02 Hearing of motion to extend time, 1993-06-02, to serve and file their factum to May 18, 1993., Reg
1993-06-02 Submission of motion to extend time, 1993-06-02, to serve and file their factum to May 18, 1993., Reg
1993-06-02 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file their factum to May 26, 1993, Reg
Granted, no order as to costs
1993-06-02 Hearing of motion to extend time, 1993-06-02, to serve and file their factum to May 26, 1993, Reg
1993-06-02 Submission of motion to extend time, 1993-06-02, to serve and file their factum to May 26, 1993, Reg
1993-05-31 Response to motion to extend time, to file the A.G. Canada's factum (1 copy) Her Majesty the Queen
1993-05-31 Notice of withdrawal, 1 copy, with service Attorney General of Manitoba
1993-05-26 Affidavit, to file the intervener's factum to May 26, 1993, with service Attorney General of Canada
1993-05-26 Motion to extend time, to file the intervener's factum to May 26, 1993, with service Attorney General of Canada
1993-05-26 Intervener's factum, 24 copies, with service Attorney General of Canada
1993-05-21 Affidavit, to file the intervener factum to May 18, 1993 (of Sylvie Roussel), with service Attorney General of Quebec
1993-05-21 Motion to extend time, to file the intervener factum to May 18, 1993, with service Attorney General of Quebec
1993-05-18 Intervener's factum, 24 copies (extension of time requested), with service Attorney General of Quebec
1993-05-06 Hearing of motion to extend time, 1993-04-01, CJ
1993-05-06 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, under rule 18 of the SCC. (see file for reasons), So
Dismissed, no order as to costs
1993-05-06 Hearing of motion for leave to intervene, 1993-05-06, under rule 18 of the SCC. (see file for reasons), So
1993-05-06 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, 1993-05-06, under rule 18 of the SCC. (see file for reasons), So
1993-05-05 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, by the A.G. Ontario Her Majesty the Queen
1993-05-03 Appeal court record, (accordeon)
1993-04-30 Affidavit, Janet Gallin, with service Attorney General for Ontario
1993-04-30 Motion for leave to intervene, With service Attorney General for Ontario
1993-04-30 Affidavit, to apply for leave to intervene under rule 18; Janet Gallin, with service Attorney General for Ontario
1993-04-30 Motion to extend time, to apply for leave to intervene under Rule 18, with service Attorney General for Ontario
1993-04-28 Respondent's factum, 24 copies, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1993-04-23 Appeal hearing scheduled, 1993-06-17
Decision reserved
1993-04-08 Notice of hearing, With service Stephen William Osolin
1993-04-01 Order on motion to order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show cause, With service
1993-04-01 Order on motion to extend time, to serve and file the appellant's factum to March 2, 1993., with service
1993-04-01 Decision on motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show Cause, on the condition that the appeal be prosecuted during the April 1993 session., CJ
Granted, no order as to costs
1993-04-01 Hearing of motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show Cause, 1993-04-01, on the condition that the appeal be prosecuted during the April 1993 session., CJ
1993-04-01 Submission of motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show Cause, 1993-04-01, on the condition that the appeal be prosecuted during the April 1993 session., CJ
1993-04-01 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the appellant's factum to March 2, 1993 nunc pro tunc, CJ
Granted, no order as to costs
1993-04-01 Hearing of motion to extend time, 1993-04-01, to serve and file the appellant's factum to March 2, 1993 nunc pro tunc, CJ
1993-04-01 Submission of motion to extend time, 1993-04-01, to serve and file the appellant's factum to March 2, 1993 nunc pro tunc, CJ
1993-03-31 Response to motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show Cause Her Majesty the Queen
1993-03-31 Response to motion to extend time, to serve and file the appellant's factum to March 2/93 Her Majesty the Queen
1993-03-30 Affidavit, Paul R. Bennett, with service Stephen William Osolin
1993-03-30 Motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show cause, With service Stephen William Osolin
1993-03-30 Affidavit, to serve and file the factum to March 2/93; Paul R. Bennett, with service Stephen William Osolin
1993-03-30 Motion to extend time, to serve and file the factum to March 2/93, with service Stephen William Osolin
1993-03-22 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to McAlpine & Horod (Vancouver, BC) re: required to appear before the Court on April 6, 1993, 10:00 a.m. to show cause
1993-03-02 Appellant's factum, 24 copies, with service Stephen William Osolin
1993-03-01 Appeal perfected for hearing, Session beginning on 1993-04-26
1992-12-17 Certified casebook, 1 copy of vols. 1 to 5, with service Stephen William Osolin
1992-12-15 Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question, With service Attorney General of Canada
1992-12-15 Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question, With service Attorney General for Ontario
1992-12-15 Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question, With service Attorney General of Manitoba
1992-12-09 Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question, With service Attorney General of Quebec
1992-12-04 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from the Northwest Territories Justice; re: does not intend to participate in this matter
1992-11-30 Case on appeal, 23 copies of vol. 1 to 5 (extension of time requested) Stephen William Osolin
1992-11-20 Notice of constitutional question(s), With service Stephen William Osolin
1992-11-17 Order on motion to state a constitutional question
1992-11-12 Response to the motion to state a constitutional question, (by fax) from Gowling Stephen William Osolin
1992-11-12 Decision on the motion to state a constitutional question, For constitutional questions see file or Reg's red book #9 @p.40. Interventions are to be filed by the Attorneys' General on or before Dec/18/1992., CJ
Granted, no order as to costs
1992-11-12 Hearing of the motion to state a constitutional question, 1992-11-12, For constitutional questions see file or Reg's red book #9 @p.40. Interventions are to be filed by the Attorneys' General on or before Dec/18/1992., CJ
1992-11-12 Submission of motion to state a constitutional question, 1992-11-12, For constitutional questions see file or Reg's red book #9 @p.40. Interventions are to be filed by the Attorneys' General on or before Dec/18/1992., CJ
1992-11-12 Response to the motion to state a constitutional question, (letterform) Her Majesty the Queen
1992-11-06 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Scott & Aylen; re: agree to the restating of the constitutional questions
1992-11-05 Response to the motion to state a constitutional question, With service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-11-03 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Burke-Robertson; re: takes no position for an order stating constitutional questions
1992-10-29 Affidavit, of Paul R. Bennett in support of the motion to state constitutional questions, with service Stephen William Osolin
1992-10-29 Motion to state a constitutional question, REVISED, with service Stephen William Osolin
1992-08-12 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from W.G. Burke-Robertson; re: withdraws the consent on the constitutional questions
1992-07-30 Motion to state a constitutional question, With service Stephen William Osolin
1992-06-26 Notice of appeal, With service Stephen William Osolin
1992-06-11 Order granting leave to appeal, With service
1992-06-04 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa,ON)
1992-06-04 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Burke-Robertson (Ottawa,ON)
1992-06-04 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, CJ McL Ia, The application for leave to appeal is granted.
Granted, no order as to costs
1992-06-04 Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1992-06-04, CJ McL Ia
1992-06-04 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1992-06-04, CJ McL Ia
1992-04-22 Service, copy of applicant's reply
1992-04-22 General proceeding, to note copy of Applicant's memo of argument in reply distributed to Justices Lamer, McLachlin and Iacobucci
1992-04-21 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, 4 copies Stephen William Osolin
1992-04-14 General proceeding, to note Respondent's response which was submitted on March 23, 1992 distributed to the Justices. (Reg. extended time to file response on April 3)
1992-04-13 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-04-03 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the respondent's memorandum of argument to Apr/13/1992, Reg
Granted, no order as to costs
1992-04-03 Hearing of motion to extend time, 1992-04-03, to serve and file the respondent's memorandum of argument to Apr/13/1992, Reg
1992-04-03 Submission of motion to extend time, 1992-04-03, to serve and file the respondent's memorandum of argument to Apr/13/1992, Reg
1992-04-01 Affidavit, to serve & file Respondent's response to April 13, 1992, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-04-01 Motion to extend time, to serve & file response to April 13, 1992, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-03-23 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ McL I
1992-03-05 Service, of leave application and authorities
1992-02-24 $30.00 filing fee, #25030 Stephen William Osolin
1992-02-21 Correspondence received from, sent to Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa,ON) acknowledging receipt of leave application. Regret to advise that material does not comply with Court's requirements as filing fee and service missing. Application for leave will not be referred until mate
1992-02-19 Book of authorities, 5 copies each, volume 1 & 2 Stephen William Osolin
1992-02-19 Application for leave to appeal, (as service & filing fee missing) 5 copies, Incomplete Stephen William Osolin
1992-01-29 Notice of application for leave to appeal Stephen William Osolin