Docket
29670
Her Majesty the Queen v. Walter Tessling
(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2005-02-08 | Appeal closed | |
| 2005-02-07 | Record returned to the Registrar of the Court of Appeal | |
| 2004-11-01 | Judgment on appeal and notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties | |
| 2004-10-29 | Judgment on the appeal rendered, Iacobucci and Arbour JJ. took no part in the judgment., CJ Ia Ma Ba Bi Arb LeB De F, The appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C36111, dated January 27, 2003, heard on April 16, 2004 is allowed and the conviction restored. *Iacobucci and Arbour J.J. took no part in the judgment. Allowed |
|
| 2004-05-04 | Transcript received, (85 pages) | |
| 2004-04-16 | Judgment reserved OR rendered with reasons to follow | |
| 2004-04-16 | Respondent's condensed book, 13 copies | Walter Tessling |
| 2004-04-16 | Acknowledgement and consent for video taping of proceedings, from all parties | |
| 2004-04-16 | Hearing of the appeal, 2004-04-16, CJ Ia Ma Ba Bi Arb LeB De F Judgment reserved |
|
| 2004-04-14 | Notice of appearance, Dominique Jobin and Gilles Laporte will be present at hearing. | Attorney General of Québec |
| 2004-04-05 | Order by, Ba, UPON APPLICATIONS by the Attorney General of Ontario, the Attorney General of Quebec and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, for leave to intervene in the above appeal and pursuant to the order of February 4, 2004; IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT the said interveners are each granted permission to present oral argument not exceeding fifteen (15) minutes at the hearing of the appeal. Granted |
|
| 2004-04-05 | Order on motion to extend time | |
| 2004-04-05 | Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the intervener, the Attorney General of Ontario's, factum to March 29/04 and book of authorities to March 31/04 and to present an oral argument, Ba Granted |
|
| 2004-04-05 | Submission of motion to extend time, Ba | |
| 2004-03-31 | Notice of appearance, J.W. Leising and Morris Pistyner will be present at hearing. | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2004-03-31 | Response to motion to extend time, Completed on: 2004-03-31 | Walter Tessling |
| 2004-03-31 | Response to motion to extend time, Completed on: 2004-03-31 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2004-03-31 | Motion to extend time, to file the intervener's factum to 03/29/04 and the book of authorities to 03/31/04, Completed on: 2004-03-31 | Attorney General of Ontario |
| 2004-03-31 | Book of authorities, Completed on: 2004-03-31 | Attorney General of Ontario |
| 2004-03-29 | Notice of appearance, e-mail from Ed Van Bemmel advising that Frank Miller and A. Thomas Costaris will be present at hearing. | Walter Tessling |
| 2004-03-29 | Intervener's factum, Completed on: 2004-03-29 | Attorney General of Ontario |
| 2004-03-26 | Order on motion to strike out, (BY FISH J.) | |
| 2004-03-26 | Decision on motion to strike out, F, UPON APPLICATION by the respondent for an order striking certain paragraphs from the appellant's factum; AND HAVING READ the material filed; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The motion is dismissed. Dismissed |
|
| 2004-03-24 | Book of authorities, Completed on: 2004-03-24 | Canadian Civil Liberties Association |
| 2004-03-24 | Intervener's factum, Completed on: 2004-03-24 | Canadian Civil Liberties Association |
| 2004-03-24 | Book of authorities, Completed on: 2004-03-24 | Attorney General of Québec |
| 2004-03-24 | Intervener's factum, Completed on: 2004-03-24 | Attorney General of Québec |
| 2004-03-19 | Notice of hearing sent to parties | |
| 2004-03-18 | Submission of motion to strike out, F | |
| 2004-03-18 | Appeal hearing scheduled, 2004-04-16 Judgment reserved |
|
| 2004-03-16 | Reply to motion to strike out, (book form), Completed on: 2004-04-13 | Walter Tessling |
| 2004-03-11 | Response to motion to strike out, 3 copies, Completed on: 2004-03-11 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2004-03-02 | Motion to strike out, entirely or parts of paragraphs 2,3,4,10,11,16,35,36,79 and 88, Completed on: 2004-03-02 | Walter Tessling |
| 2004-02-11 | Respondent's record, Completed on: 2004-02-11 | Walter Tessling |
| 2004-02-11 | Respondent's book of authorities, vol. I to VII, Completed on: 2004-02-11 | Walter Tessling |
| 2004-02-11 | Respondent's factum, Completed on: 2004-02-11 | Walter Tessling |
| 2004-02-11 | Appeal perfected for hearing | |
| 2004-02-11 | Order on motion to adduce new evidence, (BY FISH J.) | |
| 2004-02-11 | Decision on motion to adduce new evidence, F, I am satisfied that the proposed fresh evidence could not possibly affect the outcome of the appeal to this Court. Accordingly, the motion is dismissed. Dismissed |
|
| 2004-02-05 | Submission of motion to adduce new evidence, F | |
| 2004-02-04 | Order on motion for leave to intervene, (BY BASTARACHE J.) | |
| 2004-02-04 | Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Ba, The motion for leave to intervene of the applicant, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, is granted and the applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length on or before March 24, 2004. The motion for leave to intervene of the applicant, the Attorney General of Quebec, is granted and the applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length on or before March 24, 2004. The motion to extend the time to apply for leave to intervene and for leave to intervene of the applicant, the Attorney General of Ontario, is granted and the applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 30 pages in length on or before March 24, 2004. The requests to present oral argument are deferred to a date following receipt and consideration of the written arguments of the parties and the interveners. The interveners shall not be entitled to raise new issues or to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties. Pursuant to Rule 59(1)(a) the interveners shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by their intervention. Granted |
|
| 2004-02-04 | Submission of motion for leave to intervene, Ba | |
| 2004-01-30 | Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (fax copy) re: intervention by A.G. Quebec, Completed on: 2004-01-30 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2004-01-29 | Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from Gowlings dated Jan. 29, 2004 (via e-mail) re: interventions by Ontario, Quebec and CCLA, Completed on: 2004-01-29 | Walter Tessling |
| 2004-01-27 | Response to the motion for leave to intervene, by A.G. of Ontario, Completed on: 2004-01-27 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2004-01-22 | Response to the motion to adduce new evidence, (bookform), Completed on: 2004-01-22 | Walter Tessling |
| 2004-01-16 | Response to the motion for leave to intervene, by Canadian Civil Liberties, Completed on: 2004-01-16 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2004-01-16 | Motion for leave to intervene, (extension of time included), Completed on: 2004-01-16 | Attorney General of Ontario |
| 2004-01-14 | Motion for leave to intervene, Completed on: 2004-01-14 | Attorney General of Québec |
| 2004-01-13 | Motion for leave to intervene, book form, Completed on: 2004-01-13 | Canadian Civil Liberties Association |
| 2004-01-13 | Motion to adduce new evidence, (namely affidavits of A. Leatherdale and R. Souccar) - book form (6 copies), Completed on: 2004-01-13 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2003-12-17 | Appellant's book of authorities, (Volumes I and II), Completed on: 2003-12-17 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2003-12-17 | Appellant's record, Completed on: 2003-12-17 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2003-12-17 | Appellant's factum, Completed on: 2003-12-17 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2003-12-05 | Order on motion to adduce new evidence, (BY FISH J.) | |
| 2003-12-05 | Decision on motion to adduce new evidence, F, I am satisfied that the proposed fresh evidence could not possibly affect the outcome of the appeal to this Court. Accordingly, the motion is dismissed. Dismissed |
|
| 2003-12-01 | Submission of motion to adduce new evidence, F | |
| 2003-11-27 | Reply to motion to adduce new evidence, (book form), Completed on: 2003-11-27 | Walter Tessling |
| 2003-11-21 | Response to the motion to adduce new evidence, book form - 6 copies, Completed on: 2003-11-21 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2003-11-12 | Motion to adduce new evidence, book form, Completed on: 2003-11-12 | Walter Tessling |
| 2003-10-08 | Appeal court record, (1 box) | |
| 2003-09-25 | Notice of appeal, Completed on: 2003-09-25 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2003-09-18 | Letter advising the parties of tentative hearing date and filing deadlines (Leave granted) | |
| 2003-08-29 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
| 2003-08-28 | Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C36111, dated January 27, 2003, is granted. Granted |
|
| 2003-06-16 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, Ia Bi LeB | |
| 2003-05-09 | Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal | |
| 2003-04-23 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2003-04-23 | Walter Tessling |
| 2003-03-28 | Application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2003-05-09 | Her Majesty the Queen |
- Date modified: