Docket

30779

Her Majesty the Queen v. Harjit Singh Shoker

(British Columbia) (Criminal) (By Leave)

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

Proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2006-10-25 Appeal closed
2006-10-16 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties
2006-10-16 Judgment on appeal and notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties
2006-10-13 Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ Ba Bi LeB F Abe Cha, The appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Number CA031897, 2004 BCCA 643, dated December 16, 2004, heard on February 14, 2006, is dismissed.
Dismissed
2006-08-16 Correspondence received from, Burke-Robertson dated Aug. 15/06 re: the appellant agrees to recent decision being sent to the Court Harjit Singh Shoker
2006-08-04 Correspondence received from, Gowlings re: enclosing 14 copies of a recent B.C. Court of Appeal decision (sent to the judges Aug. 16/06) Her Majesty the Queen
2006-03-07 Transcript received, (85 pages)
2006-02-14 Judgment reserved OR rendered with reasons to follow
2006-02-14 Acknowledgement and consent for video taping of proceedings, From all parties.
2006-02-14 Hearing of the appeal, 2006-02-14, CJ Ba Bi LeB F Abe Cha
Judgment reserved
2006-02-09 Reply factum on appeal, (sent to the Court Feb. 9/06), Completed on: 2006-02-09 Her Majesty the Queen
2006-02-09 Book of authorities, Completed on: 2006-02-09 Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario)
2006-02-08 Order on motion to file a reply factum on appeal
2006-02-08 Decision on the motion to file a reply factum on appeal, of the appellant, LeB
Granted
2006-02-08 Submission of motion to file a reply factum on appeal, LeB
2006-02-07 Notice of appearance, Wendy Rubin and Susan Brown will be appearing. Her Majesty the Queen
2006-02-07 Notice of appearance, James Stribopoulos and Sarah Loosemore will be appearing. Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario)
2006-02-02 Notice of appearance, Kenneth J. Yule, Q.C. and David Schermbrucker will be appearing. Attorney General of Canada
2006-02-01 Response to motion to file a reply factum on appeal, (Letter Form), from A. Kapoor dated February 1st, 2006 (fax copy) re: does not oppose, Completed on: 2006-02-01 Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario)
2006-02-01 Response to motion to file a reply factum on appeal, Completed on: 2006-02-01 Harjit Singh Shoker
2006-01-31 Book of authorities, Completed on: 2006-01-31 Attorney General of Canada
2006-01-31 Intervener's factum, (new CD rec'd Feb. 13/06 - OCR version), Completed on: 2006-02-14 Attorney General of Canada
2006-01-31 Order by, Ba, FURTHER TO THE ORDER of Bastarache J. dated January 10, 2006, granting leave to intervene to the Attorney General of Canada and the Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario);
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT the said interveners are each granted permission to present oral argument not exceeding fifteen (15) minutes at the hearing of the appeal.
Granted
2006-01-31 Motion to file a reply factum on appeal, to the respondent's factum, Completed on: 2006-01-31 Her Majesty the Queen
2006-01-30 Intervener's factum, Completed on: 2006-04-06 Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario)
2006-01-17 Appeal perfected for hearing
2006-01-13 Respondent's book of authorities, Completed on: 2006-01-13 Harjit Singh Shoker
2006-01-13 Correspondence received from, D. Simon (by e-mail) re: advising of change of counsel from F. Lacasse to K. J. Yule, Q.C. and D. Schermbrucker and R. Frater as Ottawa Agent Attorney General of Canada
2006-01-11 Respondent's factum, (New CD rec'd Jan. 19/06), Completed on: 2006-01-12 Harjit Singh Shoker
2006-01-11 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, interveners (cc. all parties); re: procedures
2006-01-10 Order on motion for leave to intervene
2006-01-10 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Ba, The motion for leave to intervene of the applicant, the Attorney General of Canada, is granted and the applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length on or before January 31, 2006.
The motion for leave to intervene of the applicant, the Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario), is granted and the applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length on or before January 31, 2006.
The requests to present oral argument are deferred to a date following receipt and consideration of the written arguments of the parties and the interveners.
The interveners shall not be entitled to raise new issues or to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties.
Pursuant to Rule 59(1)(a) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada the interveners shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by their intervention.
Granted
2006-01-10 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, Ba
2005-12-28 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), cc. to all parties, Completed on: 2005-12-28 Harjit Singh Shoker
2005-12-23 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from Wendy Rubin dated Dec. 22/05, Completed on: 2005-12-23 Her Majesty the Queen
2005-12-20 Notice of appearance, Garth Barrière and Dana Kripp will be appearing. Harjit Singh Shoker
2005-12-20 Motion for leave to intervene, Completed on: 2005-12-20 Attorney General of Canada
2005-12-20 Motion for leave to intervene, (bookform), Completed on: 2005-12-20 Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario)
2005-12-16 Respondent's record, Completed on: 2005-12-16 Harjit Singh Shoker
2005-12-09 Notice of hearing sent to parties
2005-12-08 Appeal hearing scheduled, 2006-02-14, previously Feb. 8/06
Judgment reserved
2005-11-22 Appellant's record, (Vol. I and II), Completed on: 2005-11-22 Her Majesty the Queen
2005-11-22 Appellant's book of authorities, Completed on: 2005-11-22 Her Majesty the Queen
2005-11-22 Appellant's factum, (Revised CD rec'd Dec. 2/05), Completed on: 2005-11-22 Her Majesty the Queen
2005-08-30 Notice of appeal, Completed on: 2005-08-30 Her Majesty the Queen
2005-08-30 Letter advising the parties of tentative hearing date and filing deadlines (Leave granted)
2005-07-04 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2005-06-30 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Number CA031897, dated December 16, 2004, is granted.

Granted
2005-05-16 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, Ba LeB De
2005-02-28 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2005-02-28 Harjit Singh Shoker
2005-02-23 Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete application for leave to appeal
2005-02-17 Correspondence received, from British Columbia to Burke-Robertson Re: confirming Respondent's lawyer
2005-02-14 Application for leave to appeal, (order of C.A. rec'd Feb. 24/05), Completed on: 2005-02-24 Her Majesty the Queen