Docket

30981

Frank Klotz v. Her Majesty the Queen

(Federal) (Civil) (By Leave)

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

Proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2006-04-27 Close file on Leave
2006-04-21 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2006-04-21 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2006-04-20 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A-189-04, 2005 FCA 158, dated May 2, 2005, is dismissed with costs.
Dismissed, with costs
2006-03-27 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, Bi De Abe
2006-02-27 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, Completed on: 2006-02-27 Frank Klotz
2006-02-20 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2006-02-20 Her Majesty the Queen
2006-01-24 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal
2006-01-19 Application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2006-01-19 Frank Klotz
2005-06-20 Order on motion to extend the time to file and/or serve the leave application, (BY FISH J.)
2005-06-20 Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application, F, The motion for an extension the time to serve and file an application for leave to appeal is granted. The applicant shall serve and file an application for leave to appeal 60 days after the date the Federal Court of Appeal renders judgment in the case of Nash et al. v. The Queen.
Granted
2005-06-17 Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, F
2005-06-17 Response to the motion to extend the time to file and / or serve the leave application, (Letter Form), from Arnold H. Bornstein dated June 16/05, Completed on: 2005-06-17 Her Majesty the Queen
2005-06-07 Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, to 60 days after the date of disposition by the Federal Court of Appeal in Nash et al. v. Queen (bookform), Completed on: 2005-06-07 Frank Klotz