Docket

34252

Telus Communications Company v. Her Majesty the Queen

(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

Proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2013-04-04 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties
2013-04-04 Appeal closed
2013-03-28 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties
2013-03-28 Judgment on appeal and notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties
2013-03-27 Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ LeB F Abe Cro Mo Ka, The appeal from the judgment of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Number CR 10-152-00MO, 2011 ONSC 1143, dated March 4, 2011, heard on October 15, 2012, is allowed and the general warrant and related assistance order are quashed. McLachlin C.J. and Cromwell J. are dissenting.
Allowed
2012-10-26 Transcript received, (112 pages)
2012-10-15 Judgment reserved OR rendered with reasons to follow
2012-10-15 Respondent's condensed book, Submitted in Court (14 copies) Her Majesty the Queen
2012-10-15 Appellant's condensed book, Submitted in Court (14 copies) Telus Communications Company
2012-10-15 Acknowledgement and consent for video taping of proceedings, From all parties
2012-10-15 Hearing of the appeal, 2012-10-15, CJ LeB F Abe Cro Mo Ka
Judgment reserved
2012-10-12 Correspondence received from, Patricia Wilson dated October 12, 2012. Re: Word missing in the factum Canadian Civil Liberties Association
2012-10-10 Correspondence received from, 3 reserved seats requested Her Majesty the Queen
2012-10-10 Correspondence received from, 2 reserved seats requested Telus Communications Company
2012-10-10 Notice of appearance, Scott Hutchison, Michael Sobkin and Fredrick Schumann will be present at the hearing. Telus Communications Company
2012-10-05 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, T. Israel (cc. all parties); familiarize with guidelines
2012-10-05 Decision on miscellaneous motion, Reg, UPON APPLICATION by the intervener, Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic, for an order accepting its factum as filed, namely, prepared in a manner that does not comply with the printing requirements set out in the Guidelines for Preparing Documents to be Filed with the Supreme Court of Canada (Print and Electronic);
AND THE MATERIAL FILED having been read;
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted.
Granted, no order as to costs
2012-10-05 Submission of miscellaneous motion, Reg
2012-10-03 Notice of appearance, Lisa Mathews and Croft Michaelson will be present at the hearing. Her Majesty the Queen
2012-10-02 Notice of appearance, Michal Fairburn will be present at the hearing. Attorney General of Ontario
2012-10-02 Notice of appearance, Wendy Matheson and Rebecca Wise will be present at the hearing. Canadian Civil Liberties Association
2012-10-01 Decision on motion to extend time, (see order on oral argument), Ro
Allowed in part, no order as to costs
2012-10-01 Submission of motion to extend time, Ro
2012-10-01 Order by, Ro, FURTHER TO THE ORDER dated July 12, 2012, granting leave to intervene to the Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic, the Attorney General of Ontario and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association;
AND UPON APPLICATION by the intervener, Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic, for an order extending the time to serve and file its factum to September 17, 2012;
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT :
1) The interveners Attorney General of Ontario and Canadian Civil Liberties Association are each granted permission to present oral argument not exceeding ten (10) minutes at the hearing of the appeal.
2) The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the factum of the intervener, Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic to September 17, 2012, is granted. The said intervener shall not be permitted to present oral argument at the hearing of the appeal.
Allowed in part, no order as to costs
2012-09-28 Response to miscellaneous motion, (Letter Form), (from Croft Michaelson, dated Sept. 28/12), Completed on: 2012-10-02 Her Majesty the Queen
2012-09-27 Notice of miscellaneous motion, (Letter Form), to accept the factum as filed, Completed on: 2012-09-27 Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic
2012-09-26 Reply to motion to extend time, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2012-09-26 Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic
2012-09-26 Response to motion to extend time, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2012-09-26 Telus Communications Company
2012-09-21 Response to motion to extend time, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2012-09-21 Her Majesty the Queen
2012-09-17 Intervener's book of authorities, Completed on: 2012-09-17 Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic
2012-09-17 Intervener's factum, Completed on: 2012-09-17 Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic
2012-09-17 Motion to extend time, (Book Form), to serve and file the intervener's factum, Completed on: 2012-09-17 Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic
2012-09-06 Intervener's book of authorities, Completed on: 2012-09-06 Attorney General of Ontario
2012-09-06 Intervener's factum, Missing service on appellant - Rec'd on September 13, 2012, Completed on: 2012-09-13 Attorney General of Ontario
2012-09-05 Intervener's book of authorities, Completed on: 2012-09-05 Canadian Civil Liberties Association
2012-09-05 Intervener's factum, Completed on: 2012-09-05 Canadian Civil Liberties Association
2012-07-24 Notice of hearing sent to parties
2012-07-19 Appeal hearing scheduled, 2012-10-15
Judgment reserved
2012-07-12 Order on motion for leave to intervene, (BY DESCHAMPS J.)
2012-07-12 Order on motion to extend time, (BY DESCHAMPS J.) (joint with order on interventions)
2012-07-12 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, De, UPON APPLICATION by the Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic for an extension of time to apply for leave to intervene and for leave to intervene in the above appeal;
AND UPON APPLICATIONS by the Attorney General of Ontario and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association for leave to intervene in the above appeal;
AND THE MATERIAL FILED having been read;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
The motion for an extension of time to apply for leave to intervene and for leave to intervene of the Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic is granted and the said intervener shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 10 pages in length on or before September 6, 2012.
The motions for leave to intervene of the Attorney General of Ontario and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association are granted and the said interveners shall be entitled to each serve and file a factum not to exceed 10 pages in length on or before September 6, 2012.
The requests to present oral argument are deferred to a date following receipt and consideration of the written arguments of the parties and the interveners.
The interveners are not entitled to raise new issues or to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties.
Pursuant to Rule 59(1)(a) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada, the interveners shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by their interventions
Granted
2012-07-12 Decision on motion to extend time, De, (see judgment on interventions)
Granted
2012-07-12 Submission of motion to extend time, De
2012-07-12 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, De
2012-04-25 Respondent's book of authorities, CD rec'd April 27/12, Completed on: 2012-04-30 Her Majesty the Queen
2012-04-25 Respondent's factum, CD rec'd April 27/12, Completed on: 2012-04-30 Her Majesty the Queen
2012-04-25 Appeal perfected for hearing
2012-04-10 Reply to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from Tamir Israel dated Apr. 10/12, Completed on: 2012-04-10 Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic
2012-04-10 Reply to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from Patricia J. Wilson dated Apr. 10/12, Completed on: 2012-04-10 Canadian Civil Liberties Association
2012-04-10 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from Croft Michaelson dated Apr. 4/12 (to all interveners), Completed on: 2012-04-10 Her Majesty the Queen
2012-04-04 Response to motion to extend time, from Scott C. Hutchison dated Apr. 5/12, Completed on: 2012-04-04 Her Majesty the Queen
2012-04-04 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from Lisa D. Mathews dated Apr. 4/12 (by Samuelson-Glushko), Completed on: 2012-04-04 Her Majesty the Queen
2012-03-29 Motion to extend time, to serve and file the motion for leave to intervene to March 29/12, Completed on: 2012-03-29 Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic
2012-03-29 Motion for leave to intervene, (bookform), Completed on: 2012-03-29 Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic
2012-03-27 Motion for leave to intervene, Completed on: 2012-03-27 Attorney General of Ontario
2012-03-26 Motion for leave to intervene, (bookform), Completed on: 2012-03-26 Canadian Civil Liberties Association
2012-03-26 Order on motion to extend time, (BY DEPUTY REGISTRAR)
2012-03-26 Decision on motion to extend time, DeRg, UPON APPLICATION by counsel on behalf of the Appellant for an order extending the time within which to serve and file their Factum, Record and Book of Authorities to February 29, 2012;
AND THE MATERIAL FILED having been read;
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted.
Granted
2012-03-26 Submission of motion to extend time, DeRg
2012-03-12 Motion to extend time, to serve and file the Appellant's Factum, Record and Authorities to Feb.28/12, Completed on: 2012-03-12 Telus Communications Company
2012-03-08 Letter advising the parties of tentative hearing date and filing deadlines (Leave granted)
2012-02-29 Appellant's book of authorities, Completed on: 2012-02-29 Telus Communications Company
2012-02-29 Appellant's record, Completed on: 2012-02-29 Telus Communications Company
2012-02-29 Appellant's factum, Motion for extension of time requested - Rec'd on March 12, 2012, Completed on: 2012-03-13 Telus Communications Company
2011-11-18 Notice of appeal, Completed on: 2011-11-18 Telus Communications Company
2011-10-21 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2011-10-21 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2011-10-20 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal is granted. The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Number CR 10-152-00MO, 2011 ONSC 1143, dated March 4, 2011, is granted without costs.
Granted, without costs
2011-10-20 Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application
Granted
2011-08-08 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, Bi Abe Ro
2011-08-08 Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, Bi Abe Ro
2011-06-14 Correspondence received from, Amber Pashuk dated June 14, 2011. Re: Including sealing order. No documents filed are subject to the sealing order. Her Majesty the Queen
2011-06-13 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, Completed on: 2011-06-13 Telus Communications Company
2011-06-06 Correspondence received from, Amber Pashuk dated June 6, 2011. Re: None of the material filed by the Applicant is subject to a sealing order. Her Majesty the Queen
2011-06-03 Correspondence received from, Amber Pashuk dated June 2, 2011. Re: attempting to locate sealing order. Her Majesty the Queen
2011-06-02 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2011-06-02 Her Majesty the Queen
2011-05-17 Response to the motion to extend the time to file and / or serve the leave application, Joint with motion, Completed on: 2011-05-17 Her Majesty the Queen
2011-05-17 Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2011-05-17 Telus Communications Company
2011-05-11 Affidavit, From Corinne McNish, Sworn May 3, 2011 Telus Communications Company
2011-05-05 Book of authorities Telus Communications Company
2011-05-05 Application for leave to appeal, Extension of time received May 17, 2011. See correspondence received on June 14, 2011
, Completed on: 2011-06-14
Telus Communications Company