Vincent Anthony Tommasone v. Her Majesty the Queen
(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
Criminal law – Whether Court of Appeal failed to apply standards of R. v. Gauthier, 2013 SCC 32, to applicant’s defense of abandonment – Whether failure by trial court and Court of Appeal to make any proper finding of fact that applicant made a significant contribution to attempted robbery, apart from his presence at the scene, contravenes Ezokola v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 SCC 40
The applicant was charged with committing a robbery outside a bank, in concert with two co conspirators, and being masked while doing so. The Crown relied on the testimony of two eye witnesses and the complainant. The applicant and a co-conspirator stood together outside a bank, masked, awaiting the victim’s arrival. The applicant’s co-conspirator grabbed the victim and they struggled, the victim fell, and the applicant and his co-conspirator fled. The applicant claimed that they did not intend to rob the victim that night and that he abandoned the venture when he realized that one of his co-conspirators was about to commit an actual robbery. He and one of his co-conspirators testified that they went to the scene with intent only to feel things out and when the applicant realised that a robbery actually was about to occur, he said he would not participate.
- Date modified: