Summary

37459

Paul Duncan Reilly v. Johnson and Junger Law Firm

(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Equality rights — Civil procedure — Motion to strike allowed — Application for leave to appeal — Whether the lowers courts erred in their reasoning and decisions.

Mr. Reilly brought a claim against the lawyers who represented his former spouse in a family law proceeding. Mr. Reilly claimed their conduct caused delays, distress and hardship in the course of the proceedings.

The respondents brought a motion to have the Statement of Claim struck. The motion to strike was allowed. The appeal to the Court of Appeal was also dismissed.

Lower Court Rulings

February 23, 2016
Ontario Superior Court of Justice

15-55582
Motion to strike allowed. Mr. Reilly’s Statement of Claim struck without leave to amend.
October 19, 2016
Court of Appeal for Ontario

C61893, 2016 ONCA 768
Appeal dismissed.