Summary

37593

Apotex Inc. v. Her Majesty the Queen

(Federal) (Civil) (By Leave)

Keywords

Torts – Duty of care – Negligence – Misfeasance in public office – Minister of Health failing to abide by terms of settlement agreement reached with generic drug manufacturer regarding use of foreign reference product – Issuance of Notice of Compliance to generic manufacturer delayed – What is appropriate approach for determining whether a regulator and regulated party are in proximate relationship to support duty of care in negligence – Whether regulator owes a duty of care to regulated party at least to extent of making rational, evidence-based decisions following proper legislative criteria.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

None.

Lower Court Rulings

November 18, 2014
Federal Court

T-1930-98, 2014 FC 1087
Minister liable for damages on basis of misfeasance in public office and negligence; Damages to be calculated on basis Apotex failed to mitigate its damages
April 6, 2017
Federal Court of Appeal

A-554-14, 2017 FCA 73
Appeal allowed in part; Cross-appeal dismissed; Damages to be calculated on basis Apotex not required to mitigate its damages