Jaswant Singh Chahal v. Sarbjit Kaur Chahal aka Sarbjit Chahal
(British Columbia) (Civil) (By Leave)
Property - Trusts - Property — Trusts — Gifts — Presumption of resulting trust — Business assets — Beneficial ownership — Lower courts finding shares of business transferred to daughter in law were gifts — When there is gratuitous transfer and that transfer is being challenged, must trial judge apply presumption of resulting trust before embarking on weighing of evidence and does the onus matter — Whether Court of Appeal erred in finding resulting trust analysis was not warranted — What test is to be applied to make finding of gift — Whether finding of gift needs to be inconsistent with any other intention or purpose — Whether evidence of corroboration is required at common law.
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
The applicant claims that the respondent is holding business shares in trust for him, on the basis that he transferred them to her pursuant to a void agreement. The applicant sought an order that the shares and the dividends be returned to him. The respondent’s position is that the shares were a gift and that she is entitled to retain the dividends. The trial judge held that the respondent is entitled to a declaration that she is the beneficial owner of these shares. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.
- Date modified: