Summary
41235
Stéphanie Dorval v. His Majesty the King
(Quebec) (Criminal) (By Leave)
Keywords
Criminal law — Defence — De minimis non curat lex — Whether there is defence based on maxim de minimis non curat lex in Canadian criminal law and, if so, what are criteria governing its application?
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
During the forceful arrest of an individual in a domestic violence context, the applicant police officer, Stéphanie Dorval, suddenly and aggressively tore a cell phone from the hands of the arrested individual’s brother, who was filming the scene. It was not in dispute that Ms. Dorval’s actions amounted to assault. She argued instead that the defence of justification had to be available to her or, in the alternative, that she had to be acquitted pursuant to the maxim de minimis non curat lex.
The Court of Québec convicted Ms. Dorval of the offence of assault with which she was charged. In the trial judge’s view, there were other alternatives that the accused had not considered before using force to grab the cell phone, and in these circumstances, the defence based on the de minimis maxim did not apply. The Quebec Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the trial judge had not erred in law by not applying the de minimis maxim. She had made no reviewable error in assessing the evidence and the facts.
Lower Court Rulings
Court of Quebec
615-01-030805-207
- Date modified: