Summary

41326

Chang Jacques v. Rona Inc.

(British Columbia) (Civil) (By Leave)

Keywords

Courts — Civil Procedure — Appeals — Jurisdiction — Case management — Applicant seeking to appeal from order purportedly made by judge during judicial management conference — Court of Appeal quashing appeal for lack of jurisdiction — Court of Appeal Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 77, s. 6.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

In the context of litigation against respondent Rona Inc., applicant Chang Jacques was declared a vexatious litigant in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, and prohibited from filing any document connected with the subject matter of the proceeding. The Court of Appeal of British Columbia dismissed Ms. Jacques’ appeal from that order. Ms. Jacques then set down a judicial management conference in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, after which Ms. Jacques made additional attempts to schedule hearings and judicial management conferences. The court registry refused to schedule any hearings or accept any materials presented for filing, and sent Ms. Jacques an email stating that she had no further remedy in that court.

Ms. Jacques sought to appeal. The Court of Appeal of British Columbia quashed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Lower Court Rulings

June 18, 2021
Supreme Court of British Columbia

S207807
Court registry advising applicant via email that, as noted during judicial management conference, she had “no further remedy in this Court”
September 9, 2021
Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver)

2021 BCCA 340
Appeal quashed for lack of jurisdiction