Case information

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings

Date	Proceeding	Filed By (if applicable)
1992-07-24	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt (Ottawa,ON)
1992-07-24	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, The Deputy Attorney General of Canada (Ottawa,ON)
1992-07-23	Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, F.C.A. (Ottawa, Ontario)
1992-07-10	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt (Ottawa,ON)
1992-07-10	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Deputy Attorney General of Canada (Ottawa,ON)
1992-07-09	Decision on the motion for reconsideration of the application for leave to appeal, and extension of time is dismissed., CJ LaF L'HD Dismissed, no order as to costs
1992-07-09	Hearing of motion for reconsideration of the application for leave to appeal, 1992-07-09, and extension of time is dismissed., CJ LaF L'HD
1992-07-09	Submission of motion for reconsideration of the application for leave to appeal to panel, 1992-07-09, and extension of time is dismissed., CJ LaF L'HD
1992-06-30	General proceeding, Letter dated June 29/92 from Mr. Frankel distributed to La LaF LHD
1992-06-30	Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from S. David Frankel, Q.C.; re: oral argument on a voir dire adjourned from June 30 to Sept. 14
1992-06-09	Correspondence received from, from S. David Frankel, Q.C.; re: corrections to be done in his response	Minister of National Revenue
1992-06-08	General proceeding, to note copy of objective summary as well as the application for reconsideration, the Respondent's response and copy of original application for leave distributed to Chief Justice Lamer, and L'Heureux-Dubé and Gonthier.
1992-06-01	Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies (see motion granted on May 22)	Minister of National Revenue
1992-05-27	Order on motion to extend time, to serve and file the respondent's response,
1992-05-22	Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the respondent's response on the application for leave for a reconsideration to June\01\1992, McL Granted, no order as to costs
1992-05-22	Hearing of motion to extend time, 1992-05-22, to serve and file the respondent's response on the application for leave for a reconsideration to June\01\1992, McL
1992-05-22	Submission of motion to extend time, 1992-05-22, to serve and file the respondent's response on the application for leave for a reconsideration to June\01\1992, McL
1992-05-20	Proof of service, of the notice of motion for reconsideration
1992-05-20	Response to motion to extend time, to file the respondent's response on the reconsideration to June 1/92	Solvent Petroleum Extraction Inc.
1992-05-20	Affidavit, to file the response on the reconsideration to June 1/92; S. David Frankel, Q.C., with service	Minister of National Revenue
1992-05-20	Motion to extend time, to file a response on the reconsideration to June 1/92, with service	Minister of National Revenue
1992-04-24	Motion to extend time, to serve and file the motion for reconsideration included in motion for reconsideration.(5 copies), with service	Solvent Petroleum Extraction Inc.
1992-04-24	General proceeding, 5 copies of original application for leave to appeal (1989), with service	Solvent Petroleum Extraction Inc.
1992-04-24	Motion for reconsideration of the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies (extension of time included), with service	Solvent Petroleum Extraction Inc.
1992-04-24	Reopen file
1990-03-05	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Department of Justice (Ottawa,ON)
1990-03-05	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt (Ottawa,ON)
1990-03-05	Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, F.C.A. (Ottawa,ON)
1990-01-23	Close file on Leave
1989-11-24	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Department of Justice Canada (Ottawa,ON)
1989-11-24	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt (Ottawa,ON)
1989-11-23	Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. Dismissed, with costs
1989-11-23	Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1989-11-23
1989-11-23	All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1989-11-23
1989-10-27	Book of authorities, 5 copies	Minister of National Revenue
1989-10-10	All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, La L'HD G
1989-08-08	Correspondence received from, from Malcolm MacLean (Re: Fax # 604-687-1612)	Solvent Petroleum Extraction Inc.
1989-08-08	$30.00 filing fee, receipt # 14940	Solvent Petroleum Extraction Inc.
1989-07-28	Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies., with service 5 copies, with service, Completed on: 1989-08-08	Solvent Petroleum Extraction Inc.

Parties

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants

Name	Role	Status
Solvent Petroleum Extraction Inc.	Applicant	Active
Organic Research Inc.	Applicant	Active
Organic Research Limited Partnership	Applicant	Active
Becker Engineering Limited	Applicant	Active
Union Fars Equipment Inc.	Applicant	Active
Wilder, Seona	Applicant	Active
Wilder, Dara	Applicant	Active
Byerlay, Gerald	Applicant	Active
C & C Auto, Truck and Equipment Sales Inc.	Applicant	Active
Diversified Machine Tool Inc.	Applicant	Active
Johnson, Ronald	Applicant	Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents

Name	Role	Status
Minister of National Revenue	Respondent	Active

Counsel

Summary

Filed documents

Webcasts

Not available.

Related links

• Accessibility
• Restrictions