Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
21983
Godfrey Waryk, et al. v. Owen, Bird, et al.
(British Columbia) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 1991-12-19 | Close file on Leave | |
| 1991-08-23 | Correspondence received from, from B. Kincaid sent to Mr. Waryk assuring him that Chief Justice Lamer has received his letter concerning the issue of costs. Supreme Court can only consider questions that are properly brought before it on appeal. We can advise him as to the amount of | |
| 1991-08-22 | Correspondence received from, from Godfrey Waryk (Re: Wishes to have section 47 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada interpreted) | |
| 1991-04-11 | Correspondence received from, from N. Loreti sent to Mr. Waryk acknowledging receipt of his fax dated Mar 22, 1991 and April 3, 1991. Court dismissed his application for leave and awarded costs to the Respondents. Costs are taxed by the Registrar pursuant to the tariff of fees conta | |
| 1991-04-03 | Correspondence received from, from Godfrey Waryk (Re: Costs) | |
| 1991-03-22 | Correspondence received from, from Godfrey Waryk (Re: Leave to appeal which was dismissed with costs) | |
| 1991-01-18 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, (Victoria,BC) | |
| 1991-01-18 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Godfrey Waryk (Victoria,BC) | |
| 1991-01-18 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Jean Waryk (Victoria,BC) | |
| 1991-01-18 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Robert Waryk (Victoria,BC) | |
| 1991-01-18 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Robert Smith (Victoria,BC) | |
| 1991-01-18 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt (Ottawa,ON) | |
| 1991-01-18 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Bull, Housser & Tupper (Vancouver,BC) | |
| 1991-01-16 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Bull, Housser & Tupper (Vancouver,BC) | |
| 1991-01-16 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt (Ottawa,ON) | |
| 1991-01-16 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Robert Smith (Victoria,BC) | |
| 1991-01-16 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Godfrey Waryk (Victoria,BC) | |
| 1991-01-16 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Robert Waryk (Victoria,BC) | |
| 1991-01-16 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Jean Waryk (Victoria,BC) | |
| 1990-12-13 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, W So McL, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. Dismissed, with costs |
|
| 1990-12-13 | Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1990-12-13, W So McL | |
| 1990-12-13 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1990-12-13, W So McL | |
| 1990-08-07 | Order on motion to extend time, time to serve and file their Memo of Argument | |
| 1990-08-03 | Correspondence received from, to Nadia Loreti Re: Reply to the respondent's argument. | Godfrey Waryk |
| 1990-08-03 | General proceeding, 5 copies of the applicant's reply to the respondent's argument, | Godfrey Waryk |
| 1990-08-03 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, W So McL | |
| 1990-07-27 | Service, of respondents' memorendum | |
| 1990-07-25 |
Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the respondent's argument on the application for leave to appeal to July/13/90, G Granted, no order as to costs |
|
| 1990-07-25 | Hearing of motion to extend time, 1990-07-25, to serve and file the respondent's argument on the application for leave to appeal to July/13/90, G | |
| 1990-07-25 | Submission of motion to extend time, 1990-07-25, to serve and file the respondent's argument on the application for leave to appeal to July/13/90, G | |
| 1990-07-13 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies | Owen, Bird |
| 1990-07-13 | Service, of notice of motion to extend the time; affidavit in support and order, with service | |
| 1990-07-10 | Correspondence received from, will not be attending in person the Respondent's application for an extension of time | Godfrey Waryk |
| 1990-07-05 | Correspondence received from, from Godfrey Waryk, re: does not consent to the Respondent's request for an extension of time to serve and file their memorandum of argument. | Godfrey Waryk |
| 1990-06-27 | Correspondence received from, sent to Mr. Godfrey Waryk (Victoria,BC) confirming that the application for leave to appeal along with the extension of time will be dealt with by the Court based on the written submissions. | |
| 1990-06-20 | Affidavit, 2 copies, of Christopher Grauer, to serve and file the memorandum of argument | Owen, Bird |
| 1990-06-19 | Affidavit, 2 copies, of Francois Lemieux, to serve and file the memorandum of argument | Owen, Bird |
| 1990-06-19 | Motion to extend time, to serve and file the memorandum of argument to July 13|90, 2 copies | Owen, Bird |
| 1990-06-13 | Correspondence received from, sent to Mr. Godfrey Waryk (Victoria,BC) advising him that his application to the Court is incomplete. | |
| 1990-05-30 | Court of Appeal casebooks and transcripts of evidence, 3 copies of Appellant's factum; Respondent's factum; Appellant's reply; case books vols. 1 to 7 | |
| 1990-05-30 | Affidavit, of Godfrey Waryk | Godfrey Waryk |
| 1990-05-30 | Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal | Godfrey Waryk |
| 1990-05-30 | Application for leave to appeal, (now complete;see above) 5 copies, with service, Completed on: 1990-05-30 | Godfrey Waryk |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Waryk, Godfrey | Applicant | Active |
| Waryk, Jean | Applicant | Active |
| Robert Waryk pursuant to section 20 Bankruptcy Act for the Bankrupt Co. Noel & Lewis Holdings Ltd. | Applicant | Active |
| Robert Smith pursuant to section 20 Bankruptcy Act for the Bankrupt Co. Noel & Lewis Holdings Ltd. | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Owen, Bird | Respondent | Active |
| Hamilton, Richard M. | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Waryk, Godfrey
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Waryk, Jean
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Robert Waryk pursuant to section 20 Bankruptcy Act for the Bankrupt Co. Noel & Lewis Holdings Ltd.
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Robert Smith pursuant to section 20 Bankruptcy Act for the Bankrupt Co. Noel & Lewis Holdings Ltd.
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Owen, Bird
Counsel
3000 - 1055 GEORGIA ST W
BOX 11130
VANCOUVER, British Columbia
V6E 3R3
Telephone: (604) 687-6575
FAX: (604) 641-4949
Agent
1500 - 50 O'Connor St
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 235-7234
FAX: (613) 235-2867
Party: Hamilton, Richard M.
Counsel
3000 - 1055 GEORGIA ST W
BOX 11130
VANCOUVER, British Columbia
V6E 3R3
Telephone: (604) 687-6575
FAX: (604) 641-4949
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
None.
Lower court rulings
Supreme Court of British Columbia
87/0489
Applicants' action allowed
Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Victoria)
V00944
Respondents' appeal dismissed - Applicants' cross-appeal allowed
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available