Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
22554
Walter A. Tucker, et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen
(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 1992-08-28 | Close file on Leave | |
| 1992-06-09 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, Ontario (Toronto) | |
| 1992-06-09 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, D.D. Graham Reynolds c/o Dept. of Justice (Tor,ON) | |
| 1992-06-09 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Sister Jo-Anne Tucker (Hamilton,ON) | |
| 1992-06-09 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Rev. Brother Walter A. Tucker (Hamilton,ON) | |
| 1992-05-28 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, D.D. Graham Reynolds c/o A.G. of Canada (Tor,ON) | |
| 1992-05-28 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Reverend Brother Walter A. Tucker (Hamilton,ON) | |
| 1992-05-28 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Sister Jo-Anne Tucker (Hamilton,ON) | |
| 1992-05-28 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, LaF So G, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Dismissed, no order as to costs |
|
| 1992-05-28 | Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1992-05-28, LaF So G | |
| 1992-05-28 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1992-05-28, LaF So G | |
| 1992-05-27 | Correspondence received from, from N. Loreti sent to Reverend Brother Michael A.J. Baldasaro (Hamilton,ON) acknowledging receipt of letter dated May 5, 1992. Rules provide that after Resp. memo has been filed, leave application shall be referred by Registrar to Court for Consideratio | |
| 1992-05-12 | Correspondence received from, dated May 5, 1992 from Brothers Tucker & Baldasaro (Re: Do not act for Sister Jo-Anne Tucker) | |
| 1992-04-27 | Correspondence received from, of Nadia Loreti to Mr. Baldasaro informing that the Registrar has excused the parties from paying the $30.00 filing fee and leave to appeal has been referred to the Court for determination. | |
| 1992-04-22 | Application for leave to appeal, (as $30 filing fee not required), Completed on: 1992-04-22 | |
| 1992-04-21 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, LaF So G | |
| 1992-02-24 | Correspondence received from, dated Feb 14, 1992 from D.D. Graham Reynolds requesting present status of proceedings, or whether there are any steps that the Respondent might take to have matters determined. | |
| 1991-11-22 | Correspondence received from, from N. Loreti sent to Rev. Brother Walter A.J. Baldasaro (Hamilton,ON) acknowledging receipt of his letter dated Nov. 5, 1991 and refer him to our letter dated Nov. 4, 1991. | |
| 1991-11-15 | Correspondence received from, dated Nov 5, 1991 from Rev. Brother Walter A. Tucker (Re: Applicat. for leave in forma pauperis suspended pending outcome of Sister Jo-Anne Tucker's Application for Legal Aid at Hamilton) | |
| 1991-11-08 | Correspondence received from, dated Oct.10/91 fr. David Doney indicating that he is assisting Sister Jo-Anne Tucker with her application | |
| 1991-11-04 | Correspondence received from, of N. Loreti sent to Rev. Brother Baldasaro acknowledging receipt of his letter dated October 7, 1991. Applications will not be referred to the Court for determination until the matter of the $30 filing fee in each case is resolved. Copy sent to D.D. Gr | |
| 1991-10-28 | Correspondence received from, dated October 21, 1991 from D.D. Graham Reynolds. Enclosing copy of correspondence from Rev. Brother Baldasaro. It was Mr. Reynolds understanding that both applications had properly been perfected & on this basis, the Respondent filed its memo of argumen | |
| 1991-10-07 | Correspondence received from, re: service | Jo-Anne Tucker |
| 1991-09-27 | Correspondence received from, from N. Loreti sent to Rev. Brother Michael A.J. Baldasaro (Hamilton,ON) adknowledging receipt of his letter dated Aug 23, 1991. The Registrar may excuse a party from paying $30 fee. To obtain this order, must file a notice of motion for the exemption o | |
| 1991-09-16 | Correspondence received from, dated Aug 21, 1991 from D.D. Graham Reynolds (Toronto,ON) enclosing five copies of Memo of Argument with service. (Re: Mr. Doney does not act for Sister Jo-Anne Tucker. Michael A.J. Baldasaro is not a Barrister & Solicitor and accordingly, have not serv | |
| 1991-09-13 | Correspondence received from, of D.D. Graham Reynolds informing the Court that Mr. David G. Doney is not acting for Jo-Anne Tucker in these proceedings. He also advising the Court that one Michael A.J. Baldasaro is not a Barrister and Sollicitor. Accordingly the Crown has not served t | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 1991-09-13 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 1991-09-06 | Correspondence received from, dated Aug 23, 1991 from Rev. Baldasaro (Re: Cannot afford to pay filing fees etc... Request for instructions in this matter) | |
| 1991-08-08 | Correspondence received from, of Nadia Loreti to applicants acknowledging receip t of application for leave and requesting $30.00 filing fee | |
| 1991-08-08 | Correspondence received from, from B. Kincaid sent to Mr. D.D. Graham Reynolds c/o Dept. of Justice (Toronto,ON) confirming that the file number in this case is 22554, and that the file number for Rev. Brother Walter Tucker, et al v. Queen (Crt. of Appeal file No. 941/89) is 22555. | |
| 1991-07-29 | Court of Appeal casebooks and transcripts of evidence, 1 copy of appeal book & 2 copies of suppl. appeal book | |
| 1991-07-25 | Application for leave to appeal, 10 copies (30.00$ missing) (C/A no.#942/89), with service, Incomplete | Walter A. Tucker |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Tucker, Walter A. | Applicant | Active |
| Tucker, Jo-Anne | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Her Majesty the Queen | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Tucker, Walter A.
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Tucker, Jo-Anne
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Her Majesty the Queen
Counsel
130 King Street West
Suite 3400
Toronto, Ontario
M5X 1K6
Telephone: (416) 952-5042
FAX: (416) 973-8253
Email: greynolds@justice.gc.ca
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
None.
Lower court rulings
Supreme Court of Ontario
RE2094/89
Application for an order of prohibition and mandamus dismissed
Court of Appeal for Ontario
942/89
Appeal dismissed
Filed documents
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available