Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
22558
Jacqueline Rainville v. Ludger Noel, et al.
(Quebec) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 1992-02-14 | Close file on Leave | |
| 1992-02-03 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, Quebec (Montreal) | |
| 1992-02-03 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Jacqueline Rainville (Longueuil,QC) | |
| 1992-02-03 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Ludger Noel (St-Hubert,QC) | |
| 1992-02-03 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Me Pierre Robillard (Montréal,QC) | |
| 1992-01-16 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Jacqueline Rainville (Longueuil,QC) | |
| 1992-01-16 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Ludger Noel (St-Hubert,QC) | |
| 1992-01-16 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Me Pierre Robillard (Montréal,QC) | |
| 1992-01-16 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, L'HD G Ia, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. Dismissed, with costs |
|
| 1992-01-16 | Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1992-01-16, L'HD G Ia | |
| 1992-01-16 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1992-01-16, L'HD G Ia | |
| 1991-11-08 | General proceeding, to note letter of Jacqueline Rainville dated Oct. 7, 1991 describing all material filed sent up with leave application for adjudication. | |
| 1991-11-08 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, L'HD G I | |
| 1991-10-31 | Correspondence received from, (by fax) LISTE DES TEMOINS DANS CETTE CAUSE, avec signification | Jacqueline Rainville |
| 1991-10-18 | Correspondence received from, de Ludger Noel s'opposant à la demande d'autorisat ion de pourvoi (5 copies) | Ludger Noel |
| 1991-10-04 | Correspondence received from, de Chantal Demers à Mme Rainville l'informant que nous avons reçu le rapport de signification de sa demande d'autorisation d'appel. Les intimés ont 20 jours pour déposer une réponse et la requérante a 7 jours pour déposer une réplique qui ne doit pas dépa | |
| 1991-10-02 | Service, of Demande d'autorisation | |
| 1991-09-30 | Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, Completed on: 1991-09-30 | Jacqueline Rainville |
| 1991-08-09 | Correspondence received from, de Chantal Demers à Mme Rainville l'informant que la Cour a accueilli sa requête en prorogation de délai et qu'elle a jusqu'au 30 septembre 1991 pour déposer son argumentation écrite.Une documentation relative aux requêtes en autorisation d'appel est incl | |
| 1991-08-08 |
Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application, to Sept/30/1991., Co Granted, no order as to costs |
|
| 1991-08-08 | Hearing of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, 1991-08-08, to Sept/30/1991., Co | |
| 1991-08-08 | Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, 1991-08-08, to Sept/30/1991., Co | |
| 1991-08-07 | Correspondence received from, of Me Pierre Robillard opposing the motion for extension of time but will not appear | Gisèle April |
| 1991-07-31 | Correspondence received from, (by fax) of Ludger Noel opposing the motion for extension of time but will not appear | Ludger Noel |
| 1991-07-30 | Affidavit, Avec signification | Jacqueline Rainville |
| 1991-07-30 | Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, to September 30, 1991, avec signification | Jacqueline Rainville |
| 1991-07-22 | Correspondence received from, of Chantal Demers sent to Mme Jacqueline Rainville with detailed procedure on motion for extension of time | |
| 1991-07-08 | $30.00 filing fee, #19629 | Jacqueline Rainville |
| 1991-07-05 | Correspondence received from, of Chantal Demers sent to Mme jacqueline Rainville re receiving of documents (déclaration amendée + jugement de la Cour supérieure du 4 juin 1990 + requête pour permission d'en appeler à la Cour d'appel du Québec) and $30.00 cheque and informing of proced |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Rainville, Jacqueline | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Noel, Ludger | Respondent | Active |
| April, Gisèle | Respondent | Active |
Other parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Registrar for the Registration Division of Chambly | Other | Active |
Counsel
Party: Rainville, Jacqueline
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Noel, Ludger
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: April, Gisèle
Counsel
2e ÉTAGE
MONTRÉAL, Quebec
Party: Registrar for the Registration Division of Chambly
This party is not represented by counsel.
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
None.
Lower court rulings
Superior Court of Quebec
Pas disponible
Action en annulation de vente et en dommages rejetée
Court of Appeal of Quebec (Québec)
Pas disponible
Requête pour permission d'en appeler rejetée
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available