Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


22626

James Brethour v. Metropolitan Licensing Commission of Metropolitan Toronto

(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
1997-09-09 Close file on Leave
1992-12-17 Certificate of taxation issued to, H.W.O. Doyle (Tor., Ont.)
1992-12-16 Decision on the bill of costs, at $565.00
1992-12-09 Fee on taxation $30, receipt #26295 Metropolitan Licensing Commission of Metropolitan Toronto
1992-11-30 Service, of Bill of Costs
1992-11-30 Bill of costs Metropolitan Licensing Commission of Metropolitan Toronto
1992-04-16 Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa,ON)
1992-04-16 Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, McMaster, Meighen (Ottawa,ON)
1992-04-15 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, Ontario (Toronto)
1992-03-26 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa,ON)
1992-03-26 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, McMaster, Meighen (Ottawa,ON)
1992-03-26 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, LaF So St, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Dismissed, with costs
1992-03-26 Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1992-03-26, LaF So St
1992-03-26 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1992-03-26, LaF So St
1992-02-03 General proceeding, to note copy of fax sent Jan 3, 1992 to E. Van Bemmel (Re: Court of Appeal rendered no reasons) sent up along with leave material for adjudication
1992-02-03 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, LaF So St
1992-01-28 Order on motion to extend time, to serve the application for leave to appeal to Jan\07\1992
1992-01-27 Correspondence received from, from Robert Avinoam; re: will not appear on the applicant's motion for an extension of time. will not however, consent to the motion Metropolitan Licensing Commission of Metropolitan Toronto
1992-01-23 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve the application for leave to appeal to Jan\07\1992,, G
Granted, no order as to costs
1992-01-23 Hearing of motion to extend time, 1992-01-23, to serve the application for leave to appeal to Jan\07\1992,, G
1992-01-23 Submission of motion to extend time, 1992-01-23, to serve the application for leave to appeal to Jan\07\1992,, G
1992-01-22 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service Metropolitan Licensing Commission of Metropolitan Toronto
1992-01-22 Correspondence received from, (by fax) of Robert Avinoam advising that he will not be appearing to oppose the applicant's motion for an extension of time but however he is not able to consent James Brethour
1992-01-16 Affidavit, to serve the application for leave to appeal to Jan. 7/92; Charles Roach, with service James Brethour
1992-01-16 Motion to extend time, to serve the application for leave to appeal to fJan. 7, 1992, with service James Brethour
1992-01-10 Service, of application for leave to appeal (motion for extension of time for service requested)
1992-01-03 Correspondence received from, (by fax) of Charles Roach advising that the Court of Appeal rendered NO REASONS in this case James Brethour
1991-11-26 General proceeding, 5 copies of formal order of C.A. James Brethour
1991-11-04 Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies (Missing service, formal Appeal Crt. judg. & reasons), Incomplete James Brethour
1991-10-07 Affidavit, in support of the leave application; James Brethour James Brethour
1991-10-07 Notice of application for leave to appeal James Brethour
1991-10-02 $30.00 filing fee, receipt #23335 James Brethour
1991-10-02 Notice of application for leave to appeal James Brethour

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Brethour, James Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Metropolitan Licensing Commission of Metropolitan Toronto Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Brethour, James

Counsel
Name
Charles C. Roach
Contact information
Roach, Schwartz & Associates
688 St Clair Ave. W.
Toronto, Ontario
M6C 1B1
Telephone: (416) 657-1465
FAX: (416) 657-1511
Email: croach@roachschwartz.com
Agent
Name
Brian A. Crane, Q.C.
Contact information
Gowling, Strathy & Henderson
2600 - 160 Elgin St
Box 466 Stn A
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 8S3
Telephone: (613) 232-1781
FAX: (613) 563-9869

Party: Metropolitan Licensing Commission of Metropolitan Toronto

Counsel
Name
H.W.O. Doyle
Contact information
City of Toronto
55 John Street
Station 1260, 26th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M5V 3C6
Telephone: (416) 392-8040
FAX: (416) 397-5624
Agent
Name
Michael A. Chambers
Contact information
Bédard, Saucier
31, Bourque
Hull, Quebec
J8Y 1X2
Telephone: (819) 771-1210
FAX: (819) 778-8957

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

None.

Lower court rulings

February 19, 1991
Ontario Court of Justice (General Division)

252/87

Appeal dismissed

September 3, 1991
Court of Appeal for Ontario

Not available

Appeal dismissed

Filed documents

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27