Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
22847
Montreal Trust Company of Canada, Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of Celina Maylena Lapka v. Richard Allan Lopushinsky
(British Columbia) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 1993-07-12 | Close file on Leave | |
| 1993-07-12 | Close file on Leave | |
| 1992-07-14 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Freeman & Company (Vancouver,BC) | |
| 1992-07-14 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa,ON) | |
| 1992-07-13 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, British Columbia (Vancouver) | |
| 1992-06-11 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa,ON) | |
| 1992-06-11 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Freeman & Company (Vancouver,BC) | |
| 1992-06-11 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, CJ McL Ia, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. Dismissed, with costs |
|
| 1992-06-11 | Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1992-06-11, CJ McL Ia | |
| 1992-06-11 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1992-06-11, CJ McL Ia | |
| 1992-05-05 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ McL I | |
| 1992-04-13 | Application for leave to appeal, as formal C/A Order filed, Completed on: 1992-04-13 | |
| 1992-04-13 | General proceeding, to note C/A formal Order | Montreal Trust Company of Canada, Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of Celina Maylena Lapka |
| 1992-04-09 | Correspondence received from, from A. Roland sent to Freeman & Co. (Van,BC) acknowledging receipt of letter dated March 31, 1992 together with the enclosed copy of Mr. Richardson's letter dated April 2, 1992. Regret to advise that in view of the Court's policy regarding the filing of | |
| 1992-04-08 | Correspondence received from, from Freeman & Company; re: two points omitted from the response (copy of the applicant's reply to this letter and a copy of the Order of C.A. dated April 22/85) | Richard Allan Lopushinsky |
| 1992-03-19 |
Decision on motion to file a lengthy memorandum of argument, inexcess of 5 pages, Reg Granted, no order as to costs |
|
| 1992-03-19 | Hearing of motion to file a lengthy memorandum of argument, 1992-03-19, inexcess of 5 pages, Reg | |
| 1992-03-19 | Submission of motion to file a lengthy memorandum of argument, 1992-03-19, inexcess of 5 pages, Reg | |
| 1992-03-12 | Affidavit, to file a reply in excess of 5 pages; Raymond J. Richardson | Montreal Trust Company of Canada, Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of Celina Maylena Lapka |
| 1992-03-12 | Response to miscellaneous motion, **entered in error** | Montreal Trust Company of Canada, Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of Celina Maylena Lapka |
| 1992-03-12 | Notice of miscellaneous motion, for an Order permitting the filing of the reply in excess of five pages | Montreal Trust Company of Canada, Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of Celina Maylena Lapka |
| 1992-03-12 | Affidavit, of Raymond J. Richardson, with service | Montreal Trust Company of Canada, Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of Celina Maylena Lapka |
| 1992-03-12 | Motion to file a lengthy memorandum of argument, in reply to the respondent's argument, with service | Montreal Trust Company of Canada, Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of Celina Maylena Lapka |
| 1992-03-04 | Correspondence received from, from Winton & Company; re: Order of Court of Appeal is forthcoming | Montreal Trust Company of Canada, Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of Celina Maylena Lapka |
| 1992-03-04 | Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, 5 copies (motion requested - 7 pages) | Montreal Trust Company of Canada, Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of Celina Maylena Lapka |
| 1992-02-27 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies | Richard Allan Lopushinsky |
| 1992-02-13 | Service, of application for leave to appeal | |
| 1992-02-07 | $30.00 filing fee, receipt #23946 | Montreal Trust Company of Canada, Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of Celina Maylena Lapka |
| 1992-02-07 | Book of authorities, 5 copies | Montreal Trust Company of Canada, Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of Celina Maylena Lapka |
| 1992-02-07 | Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies (missing proof of service and formal Order of C.A.), Incomplete | Montreal Trust Company of Canada, Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of Celina Maylena Lapka |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Montreal Trust Company of Canada, Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of Celina Maylena Lapka | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Lopushinsky, Richard Allan | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Montreal Trust Company of Canada, Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of Celina Maylena Lapka
Counsel
1000 - 840 HOWE ST
VANCOUVER, British Columbia
V6Z 2M1
Telephone: (604) 687-2242
FAX: (604) 643-1200
Agent
2600 - 160 Elgin St
Box 466 Stn A
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 8S3
Telephone: (613) 232-1781
FAX: (613) 563-9869
Party: Lopushinsky, Richard Allan
Counsel
1030 GEORGIA ST W
VANCOUVER, British Columbia
V6E 3C4
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
None.
Lower court rulings
Supreme Court of British Columbia
C851522
Judgment in favour of estate in the amount of $325,000
Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver)
CA009012
Appeal allowed
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available