Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


22888

Patricia Joyce Gresham v. Ernst & Young Inc., Trustee in Bankruptcy for Michael Henry Gresham

(Saskatchewan) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
1993-08-31 Close file on Leave, for administrative reasons.
1993-06-25 Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application, McL
Dismissed, no order as to costs
1993-06-25 Hearing of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, 1993-06-25, McL
1993-06-25 Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, 1993-06-25, McL
1993-06-18 Affidavit, in opposition to the extension of time to file an amended leave application; Reginald A. Watson, with service Ernst & Young Inc., Trustee in Bankruptcy for Michael Henry Gresham
1993-06-14 Affidavit, (amended leave application); Patricia Joyce Gresham, with service Patricia Joyce Gresham
1993-06-14 Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, (Amended Leave Application), with service Patricia Joyce Gresham
1992-04-06 Decision on motion to file a lengthy memorandum of argument, G, for additional details see file or Reg's red book #8 @ p.301. 1) the statement of facts and argument portion of the Applicant's Applicaton for Leave is rejected in its present form, the Applicant being authorized to substitute therefore a statement of facts and argument not to exceed 25 pages. 2) the applicant is authorized to supplement the application for leave to appeal by filing the omitted judgment roll of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal and errata as to the designation of the court in tabs 9 and 10 and the description of the parties in tabs 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, and 31. 3) the request for deletion of the reasons for judgment of the Supreme Court of British Columbia under tab 14 of the application for leave , togeth er with the Respondent's request for costs against the Applicant's solicitors personally.
Granted, no order as to costs
1992-04-06 Hearing of motion to file a lengthy memorandum of argument, 1992-04-06, G
1992-04-06 Submission of motion to file a lengthy memorandum of argument, 1992-04-06, G
1992-03-30 General proceeding, 3 copies of Brief of Law and Fact in opposition to application to file defective motion book on application for leave to appeal, with service Ernst & Young Inc., Trustee in Bankruptcy for Michael Henry Gresham
1992-03-27 Affidavit, With service Patricia Joyce Gresham
1992-03-27 Correspondence received from, of Michael L. Phelan advising that he consents to the motion being heard by way of written submissions Ernst & Young Inc., Trustee in Bankruptcy for Michael Henry Gresham
1992-03-26 Motion to file a lengthy memorandum of argument, 2 copies, with service Patricia Joyce Gresham
1992-03-23 Correspondence received from, of Reginald A. Watson (Balfour Moss) describing 8 concerns with respect to the Motion Book Ernst & Young Inc., Trustee in Bankruptcy for Michael Henry Gresham
1992-03-19 General proceeding, (TO NOTE) advised Greg Zubacz again that he needs a motion to accept his application and he advised me that he had been waiting for senior counsel before sending in his motion
1992-03-19 Correspondence received from, sent to Merchant Law Group (Regina,Sk) acknowledging receipt of leave application. Regret to advise that material does not comply with Court's requirements as formal order of Court of Appeal missing and Motion for a lengthy memo is required. Application w
1992-03-18 Correspondence received from, (by fax) M.L. Phelan (Osler Hoskin) along with a letter sent by fax by Mr. Reginald A. Watson of the firm of Balfour Moss re motion book does not comply with rule 23 Ernst & Young Inc., Trustee in Bankruptcy for Michael Henry Gresham
1992-03-16 General proceeding, 5 copies of reported decisions in Marzetti v. Marzetti and The Royal Bank v. King Patricia Joyce Gresham
1992-03-11 Order issued on motion for a stay of execution, With service
1992-03-11 Correspondence received from, sent to The Merchant Law Group (Regina,SK) enclosing receipt for $30 filing fee.
1992-03-10 $30.00 filing fee, #25137 Patricia Joyce Gresham
1992-03-10 Decision on the motion for a stay of execution, of the order of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal varying the order of Justice Lawton dated Nov\14\ 1990 pending the disposition of the application for leave to appeal and if the application for leave is granted, pending the disposition of the Appeal., Co
Granted, no order as to costs
1992-03-10 Hearing of motion for a stay of execution, 1992-03-10, of the order of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal varying the order of Justice Lawton dated Nov\14\ 1990 pending the disposition of the application for leave to appeal and if the application for leave is granted, pending the disposition of the Appeal., Co
1992-03-10 Submission of motion for a stay of execution, 1992-03-10, of the order of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal varying the order of Justice Lawton dated Nov\14\ 1990 pending the disposition of the application for leave to appeal and if the application for leave is granted, pending the disposition of the Appeal., Co
1992-03-06 General proceeding, (TO NOTE) advised Greg Zubacz that he requires a motion to have his application accepted because of the lenghty argument
1992-03-06 Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies of vol. I & II (formal C/A order and motion for arguments over 20 pages <48 pages> necessary), with service formal C/A order missing, arguments over 20 pages (48), Incomplete Patricia Joyce Gresham
1992-03-06 Motion for a stay of execution, (returnable date put for entry ONLY), with service Patricia Joyce Gresham

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Gresham, Patricia Joyce Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Ernst & Young Inc., Trustee in Bankruptcy for Michael Henry Gresham Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Gresham, Patricia Joyce

Counsel
E.F. Anthony Merchant, Q.C.
Merchant Law Group
100 - 2401 SASKATCHEWAN DR
REGINA, Saskatchewan
S4P 4H8
Telephone: (306) 359-7777
FAX: (306) 522-3299

Party: Ernst & Young Inc., Trustee in Bankruptcy for Michael Henry Gresham

Counsel
Reginald A. Watson
Balfour Moss LLP
700 - 2103, 11th Avenue
Regina, Saskatchewan
S4P 4G1
Telephone: (306) 347-8300
FAX: (306) 347-8350
Email: reg.watson@balfourmoss.com
Agent
Michael L. Phelan
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt
1500 - 50 O'Connor St
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 235-7234
FAX: (613) 235-2867

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

None.

Lower court rulings

November 14, 1990
Court of Queen’s Bench of Saskatchewan

Q.B. 2892

Applicant have her costs of the action to be taxed.

February 11, 1992
Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan

722

see file

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27