Supreme Court of Canada

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date	Proceeding	Filed By (if applicable)
1992-09-02	Close file on Leave
1992-08-13	Correspondence received from, sent to Federal Court of Appeal (Ottawa,ON); lower court records sent back.
1992-08-04	Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, Ottawa (ON)
1992-08-04	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Public Interest Advocacy Centre (Ottawa,ON)
1992-08-04	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Scott & Aylen (Ottawa,ON)
1992-08-04	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Yvonne Milosevic (Ottawa,ON)
1992-07-30	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Public Interest Advocacy Centre (Ottawa,ON)
1992-07-30	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Scott & Aylen (Ottawa,ON)
1992-07-30	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Yvonne Milosevic (Ottawa,ON)
1992-07-30	Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, LaF So G, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. Dismissed, with costs
1992-07-30	Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1992-07-30, LaF So G
1992-07-30	All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1992-07-30, LaF So G
1992-05-25	All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, LaF So G
1992-04-30	General proceeding, 5 copies of EXCERPTS from the FCA books	Rural Dignity of Canada
1992-04-24	Court of Appeal casebooks and transcripts of evidence, 1 box
1992-04-14	Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, 5 copies, with service	Rural Dignity of Canada
1992-04-06	Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service	Canada Post Corporation
1992-03-31	Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Mr. Robert Biljan requesting the complete record of the Federal Court in this case. Federal Court record will be returned promptly once a final determination has been made by our Court. c.c. Mr. David C. Woods, Mr. Robert P. Armstrong, Q.C. and M
1992-03-30	Correspondence received from, from David C. Woods addressed to the Registrar, asking that we contact the F.C.A. to have the record filed	Rural Dignity of Canada
1992-03-16	$30.00 filing fee, receipt #25172	Rural Dignity of Canada
1992-03-16	Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service, Completed on: 1992-03-16	Rural Dignity of Canada

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name	Role	Status
Rural Dignity of Canada	Applicant	Active
Hitchcock, Curtis	Applicant	Active
Marshall, Pearl	Applicant	Active
Heatley, Toni	Applicant	Active
Gavel, Pamela	Applicant	Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name	Role	Status
Canada Post Corporation	Respondent	Active
Minister responsible for Canada Post Corporation	Respondent	Active

Counsel

Party: Rural Dignity of Canada