Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


22987

Peter Chanachowicz, et al. v. Betty Bryan

(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
1992-12-15 Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Betty Bryan (Orangeville,ON)
1992-12-15 Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Peter Chanachowicz (Orangeville,ON)
1992-12-15 Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Heidi Chanachowicz (Orangeville,ON)
1992-12-14 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, Ontario (Toronto)
1992-11-26 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Betty Bryan (Orangeville,ON)
1992-11-26 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Peter Chanachowicz (Orangeville,ON)
1992-11-26 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Heidi Chanachowicz (Orangeville,ON)
1992-11-25 Decision on the motion for reconsideration of the application for leave to appeal, LaF So G
Dismissed, no order as to costs
1992-11-25 Hearing of motion for reconsideration of the application for leave to appeal, 1992-11-25, LaF So G
1992-11-25 Submission of motion for reconsideration of the application for leave to appeal to panel, 1992-11-25, LaF So G
1992-10-05 Correspondence received from, of Nadia Loreti to Mr. Chanachowicz to acknowledge receipt of 5 copies of his motion for rehearing of the application for leave to appeal. His application will be referred to the Court for determination shortly.
1992-09-25 Motion for reconsideration of the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies (returnable date fictitious), with service Peter Chanachowicz
1992-09-21 Close file on Leave
1992-09-02 Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Heidi Chanachowicz (Orangeville,ON)
1992-09-02 Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Peter Chanachowicz (Orangeville,ON)
1992-09-02 Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Betty Bryan (Orangeville,ON)
1992-09-02 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, Ontario (Toronto)
1992-08-27 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Peter Chanachowicz (Orangeville,ON)
1992-08-27 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Heidi Chanachowicz (Orangevill,ON)
1992-08-27 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Betty Bryan (Orangeville,ON)
1992-08-27 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, LaF So G, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed, no order as to costs
1992-08-27 Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1992-08-27, LaF So G
1992-08-27 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1992-08-27, LaF So G
1992-06-29 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, LaF So G
1992-06-29 General proceeding, To Note - Copy of letter of Peter Chanachowicz dated May 24, 1992 sent up to Justices LaF So G
1992-06-04 Correspondence received from, of Nadia Loreti acknowledging receipt of his letter dated May 24, 1992 along with the copies of the C/A judgment. The respondent has not file a response and the application will be referred to the Court for determination
1992-06-04 Application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 1992-06-04
1992-05-27 Correspondence received from, of Peter Chanachowicz dated May 24, 1992 along with 5 copies of C/A judgment Peter Chanachowicz
1992-05-07 $30.00 filing fee, #25419 Peter Chanachowicz
1992-05-07 Correspondence received from, of Nadia Loreti to Mr. Chanachowicz acknowledging receipt of his application for leave to appeal, the $30.00 filing fee and the affidavit of service. She advise that formal judgment and reasons for judgment are missing. Once the SCC is in receipt of the m
1992-04-22 Correspondence received from, of Mr. Chanachowicz to Nadia Loreti, dated April 21, 1992 along with his application for leave Peter Chanachowicz
1992-04-22 Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies (formal C/A judgment missing), with service, Incomplete Peter Chanachowicz
1992-02-26 Correspondence received from, of Nadia Loreti to Mr. Chanachowicz enclosing all informations and material to prepare his application for leave to appeal

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Chanachowicz, Peter Applicant Active
Chanachowicz, Heidi Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Bryan, Betty Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Chanachowicz, Peter

This party is not represented by counsel.

Party: Chanachowicz, Heidi

This party is not represented by counsel.

Party: Bryan, Betty

This party is not represented by counsel.

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

None.

Lower court rulings

March 21, 1990
Provincial Court of Ontario

not available

Respondent's claim allowed; Applicant's counterclaim dismissed

December 9, 1991
Ontario Court of Justice (General Division)

not available

Appeal dismissed

February 24, 1992
Court of Appeal for Ontario

not available

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed

Filed documents

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27