Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


23427

Joseph F. Scanlon v. Castlepoint Development Corporation, et al.

(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
1997-09-16 Close file on Leave
1993-08-06 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, Ontario (Toronto)
1993-08-06 Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON)
1993-08-06 Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Cassels, Brock & Blackwell (Toronto, ON)
1993-08-06 Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Borden & Elliot (Toronto, ON)
1993-08-05 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON)
1993-08-05 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Cassels, Brock & Blackwell (Toronto, ON)
1993-08-05 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Borden & Elliot (Toronto, ON)
1993-08-05 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, LaF Co Ia, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Dismissed, with costs
1993-08-05 Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1993-08-05, LaF Co Ia
1993-08-05 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1993-08-05, LaF Co Ia
1993-04-29 Discontinuance of motion to strike out, (by fax) Francesca Meneguzzi
1993-04-28 Decision on the miscellaneous motion, for leave to file a reply to the response of Bramalea,, Ma
Granted, no order as to costs
1993-04-28 Hearing of miscellaneous motion, 1993-04-28, for leave to file a reply to the response of Bramalea,, Ma
1993-04-28 Submission of miscellaneous motion, 1993-04-28, for leave to file a reply to the response of Bramalea,, Ma
1993-04-27 Correspondence received from, (by fax) from borden & Elliot; re: does not oppose the filing of the reply by the interveners Bramalea Limited
1993-04-26 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, 5 copies (INTERVENER'S REPLY) sent to LaF Co I on April 29/93, with service Francesca Meneguzzi
1993-04-26 Response to miscellaneous motion, to file a reply to the response of Bramelea, by Dennis F. O'Leary., with service Francesca Meneguzzi
1993-04-26 Notice of miscellaneous motion, to permit the intervenors Meneguzzi & O'Leary to file a reply factum to the response of filed by Bramelea in the form attached to the affidavit of Dennis O'Leary marked exhibit "A"., with service Francesca Meneguzzi
1993-04-26 Response to motion to strike out, paragraphs of the response filed by Bramalea Limited to the intervention by Francesca Meneguzzi and Dennis F. O'Leary Joseph F. Scanlon
1993-04-26 Affidavit, paragraphs in the response of Bramalea Limited; Dennis F. O'Leary, with service Francesca Meneguzzi
1993-04-26 Motion to strike out, paragraphs in the response of Bramalea Limited, with service Francesca Meneguzzi
1993-04-19 Supplemental document, Respondent's response to new issue raised before the Court by the interveners Meneguzzi & O'Leary sent to LaF Co I, April 20/93, with service Bramalea Limited
1993-04-14 Intervener's memorandum of argument on application for leave, 5 copies sent to LaF Co I, April 15, 1993, with service Francesca Meneguzzi
1993-04-08 Order on motion to leave to intervene, With service
1993-04-08 Order on motion to leave to intervene, With service
1993-03-24 Decision on motion for leave to intervene, the intervention shall be limited to the argument on consideration., McL
Granted, no order as to costs
1993-03-24 Hearing of motion for leave to intervene, 1993-03-24, the intervention shall be limited to the argument on consideration., McL
1993-03-24 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, 1993-03-24, the intervention shall be limited to the argument on consideration., McL
1993-03-24 Decision on motion for leave to intervene, the intervention shall be limited to the argument on consideration., McL
Granted, no order as to costs
1993-03-24 Hearing of motion for leave to intervene, 1993-03-24, the intervention shall be limited to the argument on consideration., McL
1993-03-24 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, 1993-03-24, the intervention shall be limited to the argument on consideration., McL
1993-03-22 General proceeding, to note 3 copies of REPLY (for leave to intervene) Francesca Meneguzzi
1993-03-18 Correspondence received from, (by fax) from Dennis M. O'Leary; re: that he and Mr. Glaspell, counsel to Bramalea are content to proceed with the intervention on March 24/93 Francesca Meneguzzi
1993-03-17 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, LaF Co I
1993-03-10 Correspondence received from, (by fax) from Borden & Elliot; re: will oppose the intervention Bramalea Limited
1993-03-09 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, 5 copies, with service Joseph F. Scanlon
1993-03-05 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, of Francesca Meneguzzi and Dennis F. O'Leary Joseph F. Scanlon
1993-03-05 Affidavit, Dennis F. O'Leary Dennis F. O'Leary
1993-03-05 Affidavit, Dennis F. O'Leary Francesca Meneguzzi
1993-03-05 Motion for leave to intervene, 3 copies Dennis F. O'Leary
1993-03-05 Motion for leave to intervene, 3 copies Francesca Meneguzzi
1993-03-03 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service Castlepoint Development Corporation
1993-02-12 $30.00 filing fee, receipt No. 26563 Joseph F. Scanlon
1993-02-12 Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service, Completed on: 1993-02-12 Joseph F. Scanlon

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Scanlon, Joseph F. Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Castlepoint Development Corporation Respondent Active
Bramalea Limited Respondent Active

Other parties

Other parties
Name Role Status
Meneguzzi, Francesca Intervener Active
O'Leary, Dennis F. Intervener Active

Counsel

Party: Scanlon, Joseph F.

Counsel
Angela M. Costigan
Costigan & Costigan
410 - 120 CARLTON ST
TORONTO, Ontario
M5A 4K2
Telephone: (416) 922-8611
FAX: (416) 922-1963
Agent
Brian A. Crane, Q.C.
Gowling, Strathy & Henderson
2600 - 160 Elgin St
Box 466 Stn A
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 8S3
Telephone: (613) 232-1781
FAX: (613) 563-9869

Party: Castlepoint Development Corporation

Counsel
Dennis R. O'Connor, Q.C.
Borden & Elliot
SCOTIA PLAZA
40 KING ST W
TORONTO, Ontario
M5H 3Y4
Telephone: (416) 367-6000
FAX: (416) 367-6749

Party: Bramalea Limited

Counsel
Dennis R. O'Connor, Q.C.
Borden & Elliot
SCOTIA PLAZA
40 KING ST W
TORONTO, Ontario
M5H 3Y4
Telephone: (416) 367-6000
FAX: (416) 367-6749

Party: Meneguzzi, Francesca

Counsel
Dennis M. O'Leary
Cassels Brock & Blackwell
SCOTIA PLAZA
2100 - 40 KING ST W
TORONTO, Ontario
M5C 3C2
Telephone: (416) 869-5300

Party: O'Leary, Dennis F.

Counsel
Dennis M. O'Leary
Cassels Brock & Blackwell
SCOTIA PLAZA
2100 - 40 KING ST W
TORONTO, Ontario
M5C 3C2
Telephone: (416) 869-5300

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

None.

Lower court rulings

November 14, 1991
Ontario Court of Justice (General Division)

1412/91

Agreement of purchase and sale between applic. and respond. declar. null & void

December 17, 1992
Court of Appeal for Ontario

C9007

appeal allowed, with costs

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27