Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.

24461

Reddy Rajagopal Chavali, et al. v. Kanny Ng, et al.

(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date	Proceeding	Filed By (if applicable)
1998-05-14	Certificate of taxation issued to, Nelligan, Power
1998-05-13	Decision on the bill of costs, by the Registrar at $689.15
1998-05-06	Correspondence received from, (by fax) from Nelligan, Power; re: replying to the objection on the bill of costs	Scott & Aylen
1998-05-05	Correspondence received from, (by fax) from Mr. Chavali; re: objecting to the bill of costs	Reddy Rajagopal Chavali
1998-03-17	$50.00 filing fee for a bill of costs for taxation, receipt #30259	Scott & Aylen
1995-08-21	Close file on Leave
1995-07-12	Record returned to the Registrar of the Court of Appeal
1995-05-02	Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, Ontario (Toronto)
1995-05-02	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Piazza, Brooks & Siddons (Ottawa, ON)
1995-05-02	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Murray Citron (Ottawa, ON)
1995-05-02	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Blake, Cassels and Graydon (Ottawa, ON)
1995-05-02	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Goldberg, Shinder, Gardner & Kronick (Ottawa, ON)
1995-05-02	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Nelligan Power (Ottawa, ON)
1995-05-02	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Paradis, Jones, Horwitz, Snider (Ottawa, ON)
1995-05-02	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, McCarthy, Smith (Ottawa, ON)
1995-03-16	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Piazza, Brooks & Siddons (Ottawa, ON)
1995-03-16	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Murray Citron (Ottawa, ON)
1995-03-16	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Blake, Cassels and Graydon (Ottawa, ON)
1995-03-16	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Goldberg, Shinder, Gardner & Kronick (Ottawa, ON)
1995-03-16	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Nelligan/Power (Ottawa, ON)
1995-03-16	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Paradis, Jones, Pollono & Horwitz (Ottawa, ON)
1995-03-16	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, McCarthy, Smith (Ottawa, ON)
1995-03-16	Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, CJ G Ia, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. Dismissed, with costs
1995-02-16	Correspondence received from, from A. Roland to J. Smith re: acknowledge receipt of his letter date Feb. 7/95 requesting that the Court consider expediting its consideration of the application for leave to appeal
1995-02-14	General proceeding, 5 copies of pages to be replaced in the leave applications	Reddy Rajagopal Chavali
1995-02-13	Correspondence received from, from John E. Smith, solicitor for the applicants re: expediting the consideration of this application for leave to appeal, sent to CJ G I, Feb 14/95	Reddy Rajagopal Chavali
1995-02-07	All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ G Ia
1995-01-30	Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, 5 copies REPLY TO RESPONDENTS' SCOTT & AYLEN et al, with service	Reddy Rajagopal Chavali
1995-01-26	Proof of service, of response
1995-01-24	Correspondence received from, from Blake, Cassels; re: will not be filing a response; adopts the response filed by R22 Scott & Aylen	First City Trust Company
1995-01-23	Correspondence received from, from Nelligan-Power re: the Respondents A. Ault, A. Natividad & Gowling adopt the response of the Respondents Scott & Aylen et al (TO BE SENT WITH THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL)
1995-01-23	Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies (see order dated Dec. 29/94)	Scott & Aylen
1995-01-10	Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, 5 copies of REPLY TO THE RESPONDENTS SAMUEL TALBERT ET AL, with service	Reddy Rajagopal Chavali
1995-01-10	Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, 5 copies of REPLY TO THE RESPONDENTS ANDRIDGE CAPITAL CORP. ET AL, with service	Reddy Rajagopal Chavali
1995-01-05	Appeal Court record, 5 boxes (to be sent back to the Court of Appeal)
1995-01-03	Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies (also on behalf R31 & R32), with service	Samuel Talbert
1995-01-03	Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies (also on behalf R16, R17 & R18), with service	Andridge Capital Corporation
1994-12-29	Order on motion to extend time, to file the response to Jan 25/95
1994-12-29	Decision on motion to extend time, to file the response to Jan 25/95 also on behalf of Royal Trust Corp, Robert Gammon, Nelligan * Power and David Chick, Reg Granted, no order as to costs
1994-12-29	Hearing of motion to extend time, 1994-12-29, to file the response to Jan 25/95 also on behalf of Royal Trust Corp, Robert Gammon, Nelligan * Power and David Chick, Reg
1994-12-29	Submission of motion to extend time, 1994-12-29, to file the response to Jan 25/95 also on behalf of Royal Trust Corp, Robert Gammon, Nelligan * Power and David Chick, Reg
1994-12-23	Response to motion to extend time, to serve and file the respondent's response to Jan. 25/95	Reddy Rajagopal Chavali
1994-12-23	Affidavit, to serve and file the response to Jan. 25/95; Mark Geddes, with service	Scott & Aylen
1994-12-23	Motion to extend time, to serve and file the response to Jan. 25/95, with service	Scott & Aylen
1994-12-15	Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies (appeal books missing), with service, Completed on: 1995-02-06	Reddy Rajagopal Chavali
1994-12-15	$30.00 filing fee, receipt no. 21420	Reddy Rajagopal Chavali

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name	Role	Status
Chavali, Reddy Rajagopal	Applicant	Active
Chavali, Reddy Krishnaveni	Applicant	Active
Chavali, Venkata Subbarami Reddy	Applicant	Active
Sadana Corporation Ltd.	Applicant	Active
Vahini Holdings Ltd.	Applicant	Active
Meru Holdings Ltd.	Applicant	Active
715048 Ontario Limited	Applicant	Active
Kshama Corporation	Applicant	Active
Lyon Laurier Development Corporation	Applicant	Active

Main parties - Respondents
Name	Role	Status
Ng, Kanny	Respondent	Active
862883 Ontario Limited	Respondent	Active
Majestic Key Management Ltd.	Respondent	Active
Nandrum, Roy	Respondent	Active
862908 Ontario Limited	Respondent	Active
Majestic Key Construction Ltd.	Respondent	Active
Majestic Key Holding Corporation	Respondent	Active
Pump Restaurants Ltd.	Respondent	Active
Majestic Key Development Inc.	Respondent	Active
230 Gloucester St. Ltd.	Respondent	Active
Walker, Joanne	Respondent	Active
Gowling, Strathy and Henderson	Respondent	Active
Ault, Arthur	Respondent	Active
Natividad, Alicia	Respondent	Active
Andridge Capital Corporation	Respondent	Active
Gaty, George	Respondent	Active
Gaty, Andrew	Respondent	Active
Rose, Richard	Respondent	Active
Chateau Royal Professional Building Inc.	Respondent	Active
Cobit Corporation	Respondent	Active
First City Trust Company	Respondent	Active
Scott & Aylen	Respondent	Active
Royal Trust Corporation of Canada	Respondent	Active
Gammon, Robert	Respondent	Active
Nelligan/Power	Respondent	Active
Chick, David	Respondent	Active
Ottawa-Carleton Brick Laying and Masonry Limited	Respondent	Active
Olivier Masonry Limited	Respondent	Active
Peat, Marwick, Thorne Inc.	Respondent	Active
Talbert, Samuel	Respondent	Active
Talbert, Collette	Respondent	Active
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce	Respondent	Active

Counsel

Party: Chavali, Reddy Rajagopal