Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
25125
Bumper Development Corporation Ltd. v. Union of India, et al.
(Alberta) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 1997-07-30 | Close file on Leave | |
| 1996-11-19 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Stikeman and Elliott | |
| 1996-11-19 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Lang, Michener | |
| 1996-11-18 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, Alberta (Calgary) | |
| 1996-10-03 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, LaF Co Ma, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. Dismissed, with costs |
|
| 1996-10-03 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Stikeman and Elliott | |
| 1996-10-03 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Lang, Michener | |
| 1996-06-14 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, LaF Co Ma | |
| 1996-04-04 | Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, 5 copies, with service, Completed on: 1996-04-04 | Bumper Development Corporation Ltd. |
| 1996-03-28 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service, Completed on: 1996-03-28 | Union of India |
| 1996-03-06 |
Decision on motion to strike out, G, - The applicant's cross-motion requesting an oral hearing herein is denied. (for reasons see order) The motion to strike is, therefore, granted in part as follows: The Order will go striking out the letter of Dr. Sharon A. Williams dated October 2, 1995 and references thereto including para. 6 of the affidavit of Robert Borden sworn on January 25/96. Costs will follow the result. The applicant will have 14 days from this date to file a revised factum. Time for the respondents to file their material is extended accordingly Granted, no order as to costs |
|
| 1996-03-06 | Hearing of motion to strike out, 1996-03-06, G | |
| 1996-03-06 | Submission of motion to strike out, 1996-03-06, G | |
| 1996-03-06 | Affidavit, (of Pamela Richardson)(sworn March 5/96), with service | Union of India |
| 1996-03-06 | General proceeding, to note the RESPONDENT'S REPLY TO THE RESPONSE OF THE APPLICANT TO THE RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO STRIKE, with service | Union of India |
| 1996-02-29 | $50.00 filing fee for a notice of motion, receipt #31657 | Bumper Development Corporation Ltd. |
| 1996-02-29 | Affidavit, for an Order that an oral hearing be directed to the motion to strike certain material; Shirley Davis; 5 copies, with service | Bumper Development Corporation Ltd. |
| 1996-02-29 | Notice of miscellaneous motion, for an Order that an oral hearing be directed to the motion to strike certain material; 5 copies, with service, Completed on: 1996-02-29 | Bumper Development Corporation Ltd. |
| 1996-02-28 | Correspondence received from, (by fax) from Karen M. Cuddy; re: will respond to the respondent's motion by Feb. 29/96; has no objection to the extension of time | Bumper Development Corporation Ltd. |
| 1996-02-27 | Proof of service, of motion to strike | |
| 1996-02-26 | Correspondence received from, from Kenneth J. Warren, letter dated Feb. 23/96 re: requesting either 14 days from the date of the ruling on motion to strike the affidavit OR 14 days following the date of a revised leave application | Union of India |
| 1996-02-26 | General proceeding, 6 copies of RESPONDENT'S MEMORANDUM ON MOTION TO STRIKE MATERIALS FROM THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (book form) | Union of India |
| 1996-02-26 | Affidavit, of Pamela Richardson (joint affidavit) | Union of India |
| 1996-02-26 | Affidavit, of Pamela Richardson (5 copies) | Union of India |
| 1996-02-26 | $50.00 filing fee for a notice of motion, receipt no. 31635 | Union of India |
| 1996-02-26 | Motion to extend time, EITHER 14 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE RULING ON MOTION TO STRIKE OR 14 DAYS FOLLOWING A REVISED LEAVE TO APPEAL (joint with motion to strike out), Completed on: 1996-02-26 | Union of India |
| 1996-02-26 | Motion to strike out, an improper affidavit and related materials from the application for leave to appeal (5 copies) (joint with motion to extend the time), Completed on: 1996-02-26 | Union of India |
| 1996-02-13 | General proceeding, 5 copies of C.A. Order | Bumper Development Corporation Ltd. |
| 1996-02-01 | Correspondence received from, sent to Lang, Michener (Ottawa, ON) to acknowledge receipt of application for leave to appeal | |
| 1996-02-01 | Correspondence received from, sent to Code Hunter Wittman (Calgary, AB) enclosing copy of letter dated Feb 1/96 sent to applicant | |
| 1996-01-31 | Appeal Court record, 3 copies of vol. 1 to 3 (TO BE SENT WITH THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) | |
| 1996-01-31 | $50.00 filing fee, receipt no. 31481 | Bumper Development Corporation Ltd. |
| 1996-01-31 | Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies (formal order of C.A. not yet entered) (service admitted on Jan. 29/96) (NOT TO BE SENT TO THE JUDGES; NEW APPLICATION RECEIVED MARCH 14, 1996), with service (AMENDED) 5 copies (see order of Gonthier of March 6/96), with service, Completed on: 1996-03-14 | Bumper Development Corporation Ltd. |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Bumper Development Corporation Ltd. | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Union of India | Respondent | Active |
| State of Tamil Nadu | Respondent | Active |
| Sadagopdan, Thiru R. | Respondent | Active |
| Arul Thiru Viswanatha Swamy Temple | Respondent | Active |
| Shiva Lingam (a juristic entity under indian law) in Arul Thiru Viswanatha Swamy Temple | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Bumper Development Corporation Ltd.
Counsel
1500 - 10180, 101 ST
EDMONTON, Alberta
T5J 4K1
Telephone: (403) 423-8500
FAX: (403) 423-2870
Agent
300 - 50 O'Connor St
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 232-7171
FAX: (613) 231-3191
Party: Union of India
Counsel
SCOTIA CENTRE
1200 - 700, 2ND ST SW
CALGARY, Alberta
T2P 4V5
Telephone: (403) 298-1000
FAX: (403) 263-9193
Agent
914 - 50 O'Connor St
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 234-4555
FAX: (613) 230-8877
Party: State of Tamil Nadu
Counsel
SCOTIA CENTRE
1200 - 700, 2ND ST SW
CALGARY, Alberta
T2P 4V5
Telephone: (403) 298-1000
FAX: (403) 263-9193
Agent
914 - 50 O'Connor St
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 234-4555
FAX: (613) 230-8877
Party: Sadagopdan, Thiru R.
Counsel
SCOTIA CENTRE
1200 - 700, 2ND ST SW
CALGARY, Alberta
T2P 4V5
Telephone: (403) 298-1000
FAX: (403) 263-9193
Agent
914 - 50 O'Connor St
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 234-4555
FAX: (613) 230-8877
Party: Arul Thiru Viswanatha Swamy Temple
Counsel
SCOTIA CENTRE
1200 - 700, 2ND ST SW
CALGARY, Alberta
T2P 4V5
Telephone: (403) 298-1000
FAX: (403) 263-9193
Agent
914 - 50 O'Connor St
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 234-4555
FAX: (613) 230-8877
Party: Shiva Lingam (a juristic entity under indian law) in Arul Thiru Viswanatha Swamy Temple
Counsel
SCOTIA CENTRE
1200 - 700, 2ND ST SW
CALGARY, Alberta
T2P 4V5
Telephone: (403) 298-1000
FAX: (403) 263-9193
Agent
914 - 50 O'Connor St
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 234-4555
FAX: (613) 230-8877
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
None.
Lower court rulings
Court of Appeal of Alberta (Calgary)
15986
appeal dismissed
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available