Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
26506
George Hines v. Ontario Human Rights Commission, et al.
(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 1999-06-08 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
| 1999-06-08 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared | |
| 1999-06-04 | Close file on Leave | |
| 1999-06-03 | Decision on the bill of costs, taxed at $906.50, Reg | |
| 1999-06-03 | Submission of the bill of costs, Reg | |
| 1999-05-28 | Bill of costs, Completed on: 1999-05-28 | City of Toronto |
| 1999-04-06 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties | |
| 1999-04-01 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal as well as all ancillary motions are dismissed with costs to City of Toronto. Dismissed, with costs |
|
| 1999-03-12 | Correspondence received from, (Letter Form), Z. Trofimenko dated March 12, 1999 (fax copy) re: enclosing a letter dated March 8, 1999 sent to Mr. Hines from Brian Blakeley, CUPE National Representative sent to Co Ma Bi, Mar. 16/99 | City of Toronto |
| 1999-03-09 | Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, City of Toronto - 4 copies, sent to Co Ma Bi, Mar. 11/99, Completed on: 1999-03-09 | George Hines |
| 1999-03-04 | Correspondence received from, (Letter Form), Z. Trofimenko dated March 4, 1999 (fax copy) re: responding to the applicant's reply, sent to Co Ma Bi, Mar. 11/99 | City of Toronto |
| 1999-03-01 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, Co Ma Bi | |
| 1999-02-22 | General proceeding, Applicant's Statement of Arguments (4 copies) | George Hines |
| 1999-02-22 |
Correspondence received from, from Zoya Trofimenco dated Feb. 22/99 in response to Mr. Hines' letter of Feb. 15/99 and to the document entitled "Applicant's Statement of Arguments"; the City submits that this document is new evidence and should not be accepted by the Court. |
City of Toronto |
| 1999-02-16 | Correspondence received from, from Mr. Hines dated Feb. 15/99 in reply to Ms. Trofimenko's letter of Feb. 11/99 | George Hines |
| 1999-02-12 | Correspondence received from, from Cathryn Pike dated Feb. 12/99 re: opposes Mr. Hines' request for an extension of time to file additional material | Ontario Human Rights Commission |
| 1999-02-11 | Correspondence received from, from Zoya Trofimenco dated Feb. 11/99 in response to Mr. Hines letter of Jan. 20/99 re: opposes the extension request | City of Toronto |
| 1999-02-01 | Correspondence received from, from G. Hines dated Jan. 20, 1999 (hand writing) re: asking for a three month period to submit further documentation in support of leave application | George Hines |
| 1998-12-30 | Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (reply to Ontario Human Rights Commission's argument), Completed on: 1998-12-30 | George Hines |
| 1998-12-14 | Order on motion to add or substitute parties | |
| 1998-12-14 |
Decision on motion to add or substitute parties, to add the City of Toronto as a party respondent to the leave application and to file previously served material in response to the leave application. There are to be no costs of the motion, Bi Granted, without costs |
|
| 1998-12-11 | Submission of motion to add or substitute parties, Bi | |
| 1998-12-09 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Letter Form), re: adopts the statement of facts and argument set out in City of Toronto's memo of argument, Completed on: 1998-12-09 | Ontario Human Rights Commission |
| 1998-12-08 | Reply to motion to add or substitute parties, 5 copies - book form, Completed on: 1998-12-08 | George Hines |
| 1998-12-04 | Response to motion to add or substitute parties, (Letter Form), (supports the City of Toronto's motion to be added as a party) - letter from C. Pike (fax copy), Completed on: 1998-12-04 | Ontario Human Rights Commission |
| 1998-12-02 | Response to motion to add or substitute parties, (joint with applicant's reply) - book form, Completed on: 1998-12-02 | George Hines |
| 1998-12-02 | Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (joint with response to the motion by City of Toronto) - book form, Completed on: 1998-12-02 | George Hines |
| 1998-11-30 | Reply to motion to add or substitute parties, (Letter Form), letter from Z. Trofimenko (fax copy) re: has nothing to add in reply to Mr. Hines' response, Completed on: 1998-11-30 | City of Toronto |
| 1998-11-25 | Book of authorities, Completed on: 1998-11-25 | City of Toronto |
| 1998-11-25 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 1998-11-25 | City of Toronto |
| 1998-11-25 |
General proceeding, Respondent City's application record (in support of the motion to be added as a party Respondent) - 5 copies - book form |
City of Toronto |
| 1998-11-25 | Motion to add or substitute parties, to be added as a party Respondent - 5 copies - book form, Completed on: 1998-11-25 | City of Toronto |
| 1998-11-10 | Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete application for leave to appeal, sent to George Hines and Ontario Human Rights Commission | |
| 1998-10-30 | Application for leave to appeal, (filing fee missing and affidavit of service not sworned) P.S. service admitted on Oct. 29, 1998 by the City of Toronto) - (received filing fee and sworned affidavit on Dec. 3, 1998), Completed on: 1998-12-03 | George Hines |
| 1998-04-02 | Correspondence received from, sent to George Hines, Ontario Human Rights Commission and Zoya Trofimenko re: advising motion to extend time deferred to the panel seized with leave application | |
| 1998-04-02 |
Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application, The motion is deferred to the panel seized with the application for leave to appeal Referred, no order as to costs |
|
| 1998-04-02 | Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, 1998-04-02, G | |
| 1998-03-31 | Correspondence received from, (by fax) dated March 31/98 from Cathryn Pike re: will not be making submissions in response to the motion to extend time | Ontario Human Rights Commission |
| 1998-03-30 | Correspondence received from, sent to George Hines re: receipt of $50.00 filing fee | |
| 1998-03-25 | Correspondence received from, (by fax) from Z. Trofimenko; re: no longer oppose the extension of time | Ontario Human Rights Commission |
| 1998-03-20 | Correspondence received from, (by fax) from Z. Trofimenko; re: objects to the extension of time | Ontario Human Rights Commission |
| 1998-03-19 | $50.00 filing fee, receipt #30281 | George Hines |
| 1998-03-18 | Affidavit, to November 2, 1998; George Hines; 4 copies | George Hines |
| 1998-03-18 | Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, to November 1, 1998; 4 copies, Completed on: 1998-03-18 | George Hines |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Hines, George | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Ontario Human Rights Commission | Respondent | Active |
| City of Toronto | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Hines, George
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Ontario Human Rights Commission
Counsel
180 Dundas St West
8th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 2R9
Telephone: (416) 326-9860
FAX: (416) 326-9867
Party: City of Toronto
Counsel
Station 1260, 26th Fl., Metro Hall
55 John Street
Toronto, Ontario
M5V 3C6
Telephone: (416) 392-8051
FAX: (416) 392-3848
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
None.
Lower court rulings
Ontario Court of Justice (General Division)
Application for judicial review dismissed
Court of Appeal for Ontario
M20779
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available