Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
27707
Buck Consultants Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen
(Federal) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2001-01-18 | Close file on Leave | |
| 2001-01-03 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
| 2000-12-11 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared | |
| 2000-09-22 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties | |
| 2000-09-21 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. Dismissed, with costs |
|
| 2000-08-28 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ Ia Ma | |
| 2000-03-20 | Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, Completed on: 2000-03-20 | Buck Consultants Limited |
| 2000-03-14 |
Decision on motion to extend time, Reg, to serve & file the respondent's response to Mar. 15, 2000. Granted, no order as to costs |
|
| 2000-03-14 | Submission of motion to extend time, Reg | |
| 2000-03-13 | Motion to extend time, to file the response to March 15, 2000 (book form), Completed on: 2000-03-13 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2000-03-13 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2000-03-13 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2000-02-25 | Order on motion to strike out, (by the Court) | |
| 2000-02-25 |
Decision on motion to strike out, Ma, (1) The application to strike the affidavit of William Lawlor dated January 14, 2000 filed in support of the application for leave and deleting all references to the affidavit in the application for leave is dismissed with costs. (2) The question of leave to cross-examine and the question of extension of time are not real at the date of filing. Dismissed, with costs |
|
| 2000-02-24 | Submission of motion to strike out, Ma | |
| 2000-02-10 | Response to motion to strike out, 5 copies (book form), Completed on: 2000-02-10 | Buck Consultants Limited |
| 2000-02-09 | Correspondence received from, A. M. Nicholls dated Feb. 9/00 (by fax) re: will file Response to Motion to Strike Feb. 10/00 | Buck Consultants Limited |
| 2000-02-03 | Motion to strike out, (affidavit of William R. Lawlor dated Jan. 14, 2000) - book form, Completed on: 2000-02-03 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2000-01-24 | Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal | |
| 2000-01-17 | Application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2000-01-17 | Buck Consultants Limited |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Buck Consultants Limited | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Her Majesty the Queen | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Buck Consultants Limited
Counsel
181 Bay Street
Suite 1800, Box 754
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 2T9
Telephone: (416) 863-1500
FAX: (416) 863-1515
Party: Her Majesty the Queen
Counsel
David E. Spiro
130 King Street West
Suite 3400, Box 36
Toronto, Ontario
M5X 1K6
Telephone: (416) 973-3820
FAX: (416) 973-0810
Agent
Department of Justice
284 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
Telephone: (613) 957-4842
FAX: (613) 954-1920
Email: ggarton@justice.gc.ca
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
None.
Lower court rulings
Tax Court of Canada
93-2407(IT)G
Dismissed with costs
Federal Court of Appeal
A-527-96
Appeal dismissed with costs
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available