Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
28006
Mihrali Celik carrying on business under the name and style of Oxford Building Maintenance Engineering v. Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario, et al.
(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2001-04-24 | Close file on Leave | |
| 2001-04-17 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
| 2001-03-02 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared | |
| 2001-01-12 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties | |
| 2001-01-11 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondents Dyer, Brown Law Firm, Robert F. Flake and William G. Woodward. Dismissed, with costs |
|
| 2000-12-11 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, L'HD Ba LeB | |
| 2000-08-29 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Letter Form), from E. Mazzuca dated Aug. 29, 2000 (fax copy), Completed on: 2000-08-29 | Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario |
| 2000-08-02 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2000-08-02 | Dyer, Brown Law Firm and Robert F. Flake, William G. Woodward |
| 2000-07-31 | Correspondence received from, Mr. Celik dated July 20/00 re: there is no trial judgment | Mihrali Celik carrying on business under the name and style of Oxford Building Maintenance Engineering |
| 2000-07-14 | Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete application for leave to appeal | |
| 2000-07-05 | Application for leave to appeal, (Trial order missing), Completed on: 2000-07-31 | Mihrali Celik carrying on business under the name and style of Oxford Building Maintenance Engineering |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Mihrali Celik carrying on business under the name and style of Oxford Building Maintenance Engineering | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario | Respondent | Active |
| Dyer, Brown Law Firm and Robert F. Flake, William G. Woodward | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Mihrali Celik carrying on business under the name and style of Oxford Building Maintenance Engineering
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario
Counsel
Cadillac Fairview Tower
1400 - 20 Queen St W
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 2V3
Telephone: (416) 593-1221
FAX: (416) 593-5437
Email: emazzuca@blaney.com
Party: Dyer, Brown Law Firm and Robert F. Flake, William G. Woodward
Counsel
450 Talbot Street, Box 3237
London, Ontario
N6A 4K3
Telephone: (519) 679-9660
FAX: (519) 667-3362
Agent
1900 - 66 Slater St
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5H1
Telephone: (613) 231-8210
FAX: (613) 788-3661
Email: dougald.brown@nelligan.ca
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
None.
Lower court rulings
Ontario Superior Court of Justice
B31288/99
see file
Court of Appeal for Ontario
C33008
Appeal dismissed with costs
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available