Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


28489

Charles Ferenczi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al.

(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2002-01-03 Close file on Leave
2001-12-24 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2001-12-21 Certificate of taxation issued to, H.P. Brown, Tor., Ont.
2001-12-20 Decision on the bill of costs, taxed at $959.25, Reg
2001-12-20 Submission of the bill of costs, Reg
2001-11-29 Bill of costs, Completed on: 2001-11-29 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
2001-11-15 Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared
2001-11-09 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties
2001-11-08 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs to the Respondent, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.
Dismissed, with costs
2001-11-06 Correspondence received from, Joe Nemet (by fax) re: judgment to be rendered on Nov. 8/01 The Financial Services Commission of Ontario
2001-10-15 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, G Ma Bi
2001-10-09 Decision on motion to extend time, Reg, to serve and file the response of the respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. to July 19, 2001.
Granted, no order as to costs
2001-10-09 Submission of motion to extend time, Reg
2001-10-04 Response to motion to extend time, (Letter Form), letter(by fax) from Mr. Ferenczi dated Oct. 3/01, Completed on: 2001-10-04 Charles Ferenczi
2001-09-11 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, Mr. John T. Petrosoniak (by fax) re: still waiting for his respondent's response
2001-09-11 Motion to extend time, to file the respondent's response to July 19/01(filing fee and proof of service received Sept. 28, 2001), Completed on: 2001-10-01 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
2001-07-19 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2001-09-11 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
2001-07-16 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal
2001-07-09 Correspondence received from, John T. Petrosiak (by fax) dated July 6/01 re: will be responding by factum as soon as possible The Financial Services Commission of Ontario
2001-03-29 Application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2001-05-24 Charles Ferenczi

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Ferenczi, Charles Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Respondent Active
The Financial Services Commission of Ontario Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Ferenczi, Charles

This party is not represented by counsel.

Party: The Financial Services Commission of Ontario

Counsel
Joe Nemet
Financial Services Commission of Ontario Legal Services Branch
17th Floor, 5160 Yonge Street
North York, Ontario
M2N 6L9
Telephone: (416) 590-7150
FAX: (416) 590-7070

Party: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Counsel
Harry P. Brown
Iacono, Brown
3100 - 130 Adelaide Street West
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 3P5
Telephone: (416) 640-2940
FAX: (416) 869-0271

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

None.

Lower court rulings

November 10, 2000
Ontario Superior Court of Justice

915/99

see file

February 6, 2001
Court of Appeal for Ontario

M26667

see file

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27