Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
28744
Downtown Eatery (1993) Ltd., et al. v. Joseph Alouche
(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2002-03-11 | Close file on Leave | |
| 2002-03-01 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
| 2002-02-08 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared | |
| 2002-02-01 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties | |
| 2002-01-31 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. Dismissed, with costs |
|
| 2001-12-03 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, G Ma Bi | |
| 2001-09-05 | Correspondence received from, J. Lund dated Sept. 4, 2001 (fax copy) re: formal order has not yet been settled due to an unresolved dispute on costs (original received Sept. 10, 2001) | Downtown Eatery (1993) Ltd. |
| 2001-09-04 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (proof of delivery requested - rec'd sept. 10/01), Completed on: 2001-09-10 | Joseph Alouche |
| 2001-08-28 | Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete application for leave to appeal | |
| 2001-08-23 | Correspondence received from, M. Lund dated Aug. 22, 2001 re: enclosing an amended page 167 | Downtown Eatery (1993) Ltd. |
| 2001-08-20 | Application for leave to appeal, (formal order of C.A. received on Nov. 16, 2001), Completed on: 2001-11-16 | Downtown Eatery (1993) Ltd. |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Downtown Eatery (1993) Ltd. | Applicant | Active |
| The Landing Strip Inc., The Landing Restaurant Inc., The Landing Restaurant (1993) Limited, Downtown Eatery Limited, Best Beaver Management Inc. (Ontario Corporation No. 971712), Best Beaver Management Inc. (Ontario Corporation No. 1042788) | Applicant | Active |
| Twin Peaks Inc., Herman Grad and Ben Grosman | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Alouche, Joseph | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Downtown Eatery (1993) Ltd.
Counsel
Jacqueline M. Lund
1 Queen Street West
Box 105, Suite 2500
Toronto, Ontario
M5C 2Z1
Telephone: (416) 862-8280
FAX: (416) 862-8247
Party: The Landing Strip Inc., The Landing Restaurant Inc., The Landing Restaurant (1993) Limited, Downtown Eatery Limited, Best Beaver Management Inc. (Ontario Corporation No. 971712), Best Beaver Management Inc. (Ontario Corporation No. 1042788)
Counsel
1 Queen Street West
Box 105, Suite 2500
Toronto, Ontario
M5C 2Z1
Telephone: (416) 862-8280
FAX: (416) 862-8247
Party: Twin Peaks Inc., Herman Grad and Ben Grosman
Counsel
1 Queen Street West
Box 105, Suite 2500
Toronto, Ontario
M5C 2Z1
Telephone: (416) 862-8280
FAX: (416) 862-8247
Party: Alouche, Joseph
Counsel
Adelaide Place, ING Tower
181 University Avenue, Suite 2200
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 3M7
Telephone: (416) 601-6809
FAX: (416) 947-0909
Email: ghodder@poltenhodder.com
Agent
World Exchange Plaza
20th Floor, 45 O'Connor
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1A4
Telephone: (613) 788-2222
FAX: (613) 788-2247
Email: gord.cameron@blakes.com
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
None.
Lower court rulings
Ontario Superior Court of Justice
97-CV-129317
Respondent’s counterclaim seeking enforcement of damages award for wrongful dismissal granted against Applicant “Best Beaver Management Inc.”, dismissed
Court of Appeal for Ontario
C33989
Appeal allowed: Respondent entitled to recover damages in amount of $59,906.76 from Applicants
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available