Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


28762

Mike Pawlus, et al. v. Banque Nationale de Paris (Canada), et al.

(Alberta) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2001-10-10 Close file on Leave
2001-10-10 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2001-10-02 Correspondence received from, (Letter Form), Mike Pawlus (fax) a copy of a letter adressed to Me Bourcheix re: not aware of a settlement. Mike Pawlus
2001-09-20 Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared
2001-09-13 Correspondence received from, Mr. Pawlus (by fax) dated Sept. 12/01 adressed to the CJ Mike Pawlus
2001-09-10 Order on motion to extend the time to file and/or serve the leave application, (by the Court)
2001-09-10 Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application, LeB, From a review of the motion and supporting documents, it appears that the applicants have not made any grounds justifying an extension of the time to serve and file a motion for leave to appeal and for a stay of the order of the Court of Appeal of Alberta. In addition, the applicants have failed to seek a stay of proceedings from the Court of Appeal. For these reasons, the application is dismissed without costs.

Dismissed, without costs
2001-09-10 Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, LeB
2001-08-17 Response to the motion to extend the time to file and / or serve the leave application, (bookform), Completed on: 2001-08-17 Banque Nationale de Paris (Canada)
2001-08-01 Correspondence received from, Mr. Pawlus (by fax) dated August 1/01 re: extension to file the application to Dec. 31/01 Mike Pawlus
2001-07-20 Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, to December 31/01(see letter of August 1/01), Completed on: 2001-09-14 Mike Pawlus
2001-06-12 Correspondence received, from Darren R. Bieganek (by fax) in bulk

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Pawlus, Mike Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Banque Nationale de Paris (Canada) Respondent Active

And Between

Sub parties (1) - Appellants
Name Role Status
Apiola, also known as Anna Pawlus, Anna Applicant Active

v.

Sub parties (1) - Respondents
Name Role Status
Banque Nationale de Paris (Canada) Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Pawlus, Mike

This party is not represented by counsel.

Party: Apiola, also known as Anna Pawlus, Anna

This party is not represented by counsel.

Party: Banque Nationale de Paris (Canada)

Counsel
Juliana E. Topolniski, Q.C.
Bishop & McKenzie
2500, 10104 103 Ave.
Edmonton, Alberta
T5J 1V3
Telephone: (780) 426-5550
FAX: (780) 426-1305

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

None.

Lower court rulings

November 26, 1998
Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta

64445, 64446

see judgment

March 29, 2000
Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta

64445, 64446

see judgment

February 1, 2001
Court of Appeal of Alberta (Edmonton)

0003-0146-AC, 9803- 0581-AC, 9803-0580-AC

appeals are dismissed

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27