Case information

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings

Date	Proceeding	Filed By (if applicable)
2005-09-12	Close file on Leave
2005-09-02	Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2005-09-02	Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2005-09-01	Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Number CA032396, dated January 11, 2005, is dismissed with costs to the respondents Peter Breederland, Cliff Denny, Murray Driediger, Steven Langford, Ivar Rage, David Ryall, Herb Schlacht, Andy Smith, Albert Van Marrewyk, Henry Easingwood, Harry Groenwold, Gordon Hilliker, Michael Hoare, Bryan Schrieber and Tako Van Popta. Dismissed, with costs
2005-09-01	Decision on motion to deem proceedings as vexatious, The motion under Rule 66 is dismissed. Dismissed
2005-07-18	Submission of motion to deem proceedings as vexatious, CJ Bi Cha
2005-07-18	All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ Bi Cha
2005-04-29	Reply to motion to deem proceedings as vexatious, Completed on: 2005-05-11	Harry Groenwold
2005-04-22	Response to motion to deem proceedings as vexatious, (bookform), Completed on: 2005-04-22	Abraham Paulus Houweling aka Paul Houweling
2005-04-22	Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, Completed on: 2005-04-22	Abraham Paulus Houweling aka Paul Houweling
2005-04-22	Supplemental document, Appendix I to X	Abraham Paulus Houweling aka Paul Houweling
2005-04-18	Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Letter Form), from Kibben Jackson dated Apr. 15/05 re: supports the position taken by other respondents, Completed on: 2005-04-18	Houweling Nurseries Ltd.
2005-04-18	Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Letter Form), from Tracey M. Cohen dated Apr. 15/05 re: supports the position taken by other respondents, Completed on: 2005-04-18	Ben Langelaar
2005-04-11	Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Service missing - Rec'd April 25, 2005, Completed on: 2005-04-25	Harry Groenwold
2005-04-11	Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2005-04-11	Peter Breederland, Cliff Denny
2005-04-11	Motion to deem proceedings as vexatious, namely the application for leave (bookform)(3 add. copies rec'd Apr. 25/05), Completed on: 2005-04-25	Harry Groenwold
2005-04-08	Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2005-04-08	Murray Driedeger
2005-04-07	Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal
2005-04-04	Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Service missing - rec'd April 18, 2005, Completed on: 2005-04-19	Hank Easingwood
2005-04-01	Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Service missing, Completed on: 2005-06-09	Michael Hoare
2005-03-14	Application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2005-03-14	Abraham Paulus Houweling aka Paul Houweling

Parties

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants

Name	Role	Status
Abraham Paulus Houweling aka Paul Houweling	Applicant	Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents

Name	Role	Status
Houweling Nurseries Ltd.	Respondent	Active
HNL Bradner Nurseries Ltd., Houweling Nurseries Oxnard, Inc.	Respondent	Active
Peter Breederland, Cliff Denny	Respondent	Active
Driedeger, Murray	Respondent	Active
Cornelius Houweling aka Del Rillo Hothouses	Respondent	Active
Steven Langford, Ivar Rage, David Ryall, Herb Schlacht, Andy Smith, Albert Van Marrewyk	Respondent	Active
Easingwood, Hank	Respondent	Active
Graham, Doug	Respondent	Active
Groenwold, Harry	Respondent	Active
Harry, Glen	Respondent	Active
Hilliker, Gordon	Respondent	Active
Hoare, Michael	Respondent	Active
Langelaar, Ben	Respondent	Active
Pel, David	Respondent	Active
Brian Schreiber, Tako Van Popta	Respondent	Active

Counsel

Summary

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Related links

• Accessibility
• Restrictions

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Related links

• Accessibility
• Restrictions

Webcasts

Not available.

Related links

• Accessibility
• Restrictions