Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


37077

John Louis Steven Rice, et al. v. Attorney General of Canada, et al.

(Quebec) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2017-07-18 Close file on Leave
2017-07-18 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, all parties, re: cover letter and certificate of taxation
2017-07-18 Certificate of taxation issued to, Me Nancy Bonsaint
2017-07-18 Decision on the bill of costs, in the amount of $2,367.25, Reg
2017-07-18 Submission of the bill of costs, Reg
2017-06-15 Bill of costs, Completed on: 2017-06-15 Attorney General of Canada
2016-12-23 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2016-12-23 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2016-12-22 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Quebec (Montréal), Number 500-09-024124-133, 2016 QCCA 666, dated April 21, 2016, is dismissed with costs.
Dismissed, with costs
2016-10-24 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, Abe Ka Br
2016-08-29 Book of authorities, (Book Form), (3 volumes), (Electronic version filed on 2016-09-08) Attorney General of Canada
2016-08-25 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2016-08-25, (Printed version filed on 2016-08-25) John Louis Steven Rice
2016-08-22 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), (Electronic version filed on 2016-08-24) Attorney General of Canada
2016-08-22 Notice of name, (Letter Form), (Electronic version filed on 2016-08-24) Attorney General of Canada
2016-08-22 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2016-08-22, (Electronic version filed on 2016-08-24) Attorney General of Canada
2016-08-19 Notice of name, (Letter Form), (Electronic version filed on 2016-08-22) Attorney General of Quebec
2016-08-19 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), (Electronic version filed on 2016-08-22) Attorney General of Quebec
2016-08-19 Book of authorities, (Book Form), (2 volumes), (Electronic version filed on 2016-08-22) Attorney General of Quebec
2016-08-19 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2016-08-19, (Electronic version filed on 2016-08-22) Attorney General of Quebec
2016-07-14 Correspondence received from, (Letter Form), Update to counsel contact information, (Printed version filed on 2016-07-14) Attorney General of Quebec
2016-06-21 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal, (File open)
2016-06-16 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), (Electronic version filed on 2016-06-23) John Louis Steven Rice
2016-06-16 Book of authorities, (Book Form), (3 volumes), (Electronic version filed on 2016-06-21) John Louis Steven Rice
2016-06-16 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2016-06-16, (Electronic version filed on 2016-06-21) John Louis Steven Rice

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
John Louis Steven Rice Applicant Active
Wallace Stacey, Sylvia Grégoire Thomas, Donna Delaronde, Leah Diome, Bobbijo Delormier, Debra Goodleaf, John McComber, Lee Jacobs and Derek White Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Attorney General of Canada Respondent Active
Attorney General of Quebec Respondent Active
Sous-ministre du revenu du Québec and Agence du revenu du Québec Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: John Louis Steven Rice

Counsel
Timothé R. Huot
Pam MacEachern
Spiegel Sohmer
1255 Peel Street, Suite 1000
Montréal, Quebec
H3B 2T9
Telephone: (514) 875-2100
FAX: (514) 875-8237
Email: thuot@spiegelsohmer.com
Agent
Christopher Rootham
Nelligan O'Brien Payne LLP
1500-50 O'Connor Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 231-8311
FAX: (613) 788-3667
Email: christopher.rootham@nelligan.ca

Party: Wallace Stacey, Sylvia Grégoire Thomas, Donna Delaronde, Leah Diome, Bobbijo Delormier, Debra Goodleaf, John McComber, Lee Jacobs and Derek White

Counsel
Timothé R. Huot
Pam MacEachern
Spiegel Sohmer
1255 Peel Street, Suite 1000
Montréal, Quebec
H3B 2T9
Telephone: (514) 875-2100
FAX: (514) 875-8237
Email: thuot@spiegelsohmer.com
Agent
Christopher Rootham
Nelligan O'Brien Payne LLP
1500-50 O'Connor Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 231-8311
FAX: (613) 788-3667
Email: christopher.rootham@nelligan.ca

Party: Attorney General of Canada

Counsel
Nancy Bonsaint
Procureur général du Canada
284, rue Wellington
SAT-6046
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
Telephone: (613) 941-8283
FAX: (613) 952-6006
Email: nancy.bonsaint@justice.gc.ca

Party: Attorney General of Quebec

Counsel
Patrice Peltier-Rivest
Directeur des poursuites criminelles et pénales du Québec
2050, rue Bleury
bureau 6.00
Montréal, Quebec
H3A 2J5
Telephone: (514) 873-6493 Ext: 53270
FAX: (514) 873-6475
Email: patrice.peltier-rivest@dpcp.gouv.qc.ca

Party: Sous-ministre du revenu du Québec and Agence du revenu du Québec

Counsel
Patrice Peltier-Rivest
Directeur des poursuites criminelles et pénales du Québec
2050, rue Bleury
bureau 6.00
Montréal, Quebec
H3A 2J5
Telephone: (514) 873-6493 Ext: 53270
FAX: (514) 873-6475
Email: patrice.peltier-rivest@dpcp.gouv.qc.ca

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

Taxation ? Goods and services tax ? Fuel tax ? Aboriginal law ? Applicants are Status Indian, as defined in the Indian Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. I-5 ? Applicants assessed under Excise Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. E-15, and An Act Respecting the Québec Sales Tax, CQLR c. T-0.1 for failure to collect and remit taxes from sales of gasoline to non-Indian consumers ? Whether the Royal Proclamation, 1763, an autonomous source of Aboriginal rights, grants Natives a right to free and open trade with all subjects of the Crown ? Whether Natives’ right to free and open trade with all subjects of the Crown granted by the Royal Proclamation, 1763 is constitutionally protected ? Whether the tax compliance and administrative burdens uniquely placed upon Status-Indian merchants carrying on business within a reserve and trading with Natives and non-Natives are an infringement of their constitutional right to trade freely and openly with all subjects of the Crown ? Whether the Fuel Tax Act, CQLR c. T-1, the Excise Tax Act and the Quebec Sales Tax Act are inoperative insofar as they infringe on this right ? Whether the liabilities that applicants are made to bear under these statutes are contrary to the protections afforded them by ss. 87 to 90 of the Indian Act ? Whether Status Indians carrying on business entirely within the protected confines of the reserve are meant to have an economic advantage resulting from the protections afforded them by ss. 87 to 90 of the Indian Act ? Whether the courts below misapplied the principles relevant to economic advantage put forth by this Court.

The applicants are Status Indians and members of the Mohawk Nation. They own gasoline stations on a reserve. The majority of gasoline consumers are not Indian, but they purchase gas on the reserve in order to save money because merchants are not collecting applicable taxes on gasoline. Unlike Status Indian consumers who live on the reserve, other consumers must pay the federal goods and services tax (GST) and Quebec sales tax (QST) when they purchase gasoline. The applicants are required to collect and remit these taxes to Revenue Quebec which collects and administers GST on behalf of Canada. The applicants pay neither GST nor QST when they purchase fuel from their suppliers, but they do pay fuel tax, which is compensated when a retail sale is made.

Quebec’s Minister of Revenue sought to assess the applicants for the sales taxes that should have been collected and remitted. In response, the applicants sought a declaration that, as Status Indians, they had no obligation to act as collection agents of the applicable taxes, and that certain provisions of the Indian Act, the Excise Tax Act, the Quebec Sales Tax Act and the Fuel Tax Act be declared inapplicable to them. The applicants further argued that they had the right to trade freely, based on the Royal Proclamation, 1763, and an ancestral right within the meaning of s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. They also challenged Quebec’s fuel tax exemption program designed to benefit Indians from the exemption to pay fuel taxes when purchasing gasoline on a reserve.

Lower court rulings

December 5, 2013
Superior Court of Quebec

2013 QCCS 6083, 500-05-006143-943, 500-17-058614-101, 500-17-066353-114

Motion for declaratory judgment dismissed

April 21, 2016
Court of Appeal of Quebec (Montréal)

2016 QCCA 666, 500-09-024124-133

Appeal dismissed

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27