Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


39272

Groupe Maison Candiac Inc. v. Attorney General of Canada, et al.

(Federal) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2021-03-05 Close file on Leave
2020-12-11 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2020-12-11 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2020-12-10 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A-279-18, 2020 CAF 88, dated May 15, 2020, is dismissed with costs to the respondent, Attorney General of Canada.
Dismissed, with costs
2020-10-26 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court
2020-10-06 Notice of change of solicitor, (Letter Form) Attorney General of Canada
2020-09-18 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Book Form), Completed on: 2020-09-18 Groupe Maison Candiac Inc.
2020-09-15 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form) Québec Environmental Law Centre
2020-09-15 Notice of name, (Letter Form) Québec Environmental Law Centre
2020-09-14 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Agrees with the response filed by the Attorney General of Canada, and will therefore not be filing a response of their own.
Missing: Form 23A (rec' 09/15/20), Form 14 - Notice of Name (rec' 09/15/20), Completed on: 2020-09-14
Québec Environmental Law Centre
2020-09-14 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), (Printed version filed on 2020-09-15) Attorney General of Canada
2020-09-14 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2020-09-14, (Printed version filed on 2020-09-15) Attorney General of Canada
2020-08-13 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED 08/13/20
2020-08-07 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form) Groupe Maison Candiac Inc.
2020-08-07 Notice of name, (Letter Form) Groupe Maison Candiac Inc.
2020-08-07 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), (4 volumes), Completed on: 2020-08-07 Groupe Maison Candiac Inc.

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Groupe Maison Candiac Inc. Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Attorney General of Canada Respondent Active
Québec Environmental Law Centre Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Groupe Maison Candiac Inc.

Counsel
Alain Chevrier
Alexandre Fournier
Dunton Rainville S.E.N.C.R.L.
Tour de la Bourse
43e étage, 800 Place Victoria
Montréal, Quebec
H4Z 1H1
Telephone: (514) 866-6743
FAX: (514) 866-8854
Email: AChevrier@duntonrainville.com

Party: Attorney General of Canada

Counsel
Michelle Kellam
Attorney General of Canada
200 boulevard René-Lévesque Ouest
Tour Est, 9e étage
Montréal, Quebec
H2Z 1X4
Telephone: (514) 496-4073
FAX: (514) 496-7876
Email: michelle.kellam@justice.gc.ca
Agent
Christopher M. Rupar
Attorney General of Canada
Department of Justice Canada, Civil Litigation Section
50 O'Connor Street, 5th Floor
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
Telephone: (613) 941-2351
FAX: (613) 954-1920
Email: christopher.rupar@justice.gc.ca

Party: Québec Environmental Law Centre

Counsel
David Robitaille
Marc Bishai
Michel Bélanger Avocats Inc.
454 avenue Laurier Est
Montréal, Quebec
H2J 1E7
Telephone: (819) 598-3814
FAX: (514) 331-0514
Email: david.robitaille@uottawa.ca

Summary

Keywords

Constitutional law — Division of legislative powers — Environmental protection — Criminal law — Whether Federal Court of Appeal made overriding error in finding that order at issue was not colourable intrusion upon jurisdiction of province of Quebec — Whether Federal Court of Appeal erred in widening exception for so called regulatory criminal provisions — Whether Federal Court of Appeal erred in finding that s. 64 of Species at Risk Act established compensation scheme that displaced art. 952 of Civil Code of Québec and that non-payment of compensation could not affect validity of order at issue — Species at Risk Act, S.C. 2002, c. 29, ss. 64 and 80(4)(c)(ii) — Civil Code of Québec, CQLR, c. CCQ 1991, art. 952 — Emergency Order for the Protection of the Western Chorus Frog (Great Lakes / St. Lawrence — Canadian Shield Population), SOR/2016 211.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

The applicant is a real estate promoter and builder. In 2010, with a view to the residential development of its lands, it obtained an authorization certificate from the province’s Ministère de l’Environnement that required it to create conservation zones on its property and to establish a monitoring program. In July 2016, on the recommendation of the federal Department of the Environment, and under the enabling provision of the Species at Risk Act, S.C. 2002, c. 29, the Governor in Council made an emergency order for the protection of the Western Chorus Frog, a species at risk that was present on the applicant’s lands, in order to prohibit activities that might destroy its habitat. The Federal Court dismissed the applicant’s application for judicial review, finding that the legislative provision was not ultra vires Parliament and that the emergency order was not a form of expropriation without compensation. The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s appeal, holding that the trial judge had not erred in finding that the provision was within Parliament’s criminal law power and that the absence of compensation did not make the emergency order invalid.

Lower court rulings

June 22, 2018
Federal Court

2018 CF 643, T-1294-16

Application for judicial review dismissed with costs

May 15, 2020
Federal Court of Appeal

2020 CAF 88, A-279-18

Appeal dismissed with costs

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27