Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
39575
David Palombi v. Angela Elizabeth Van
(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-02 | Close file on Leave | |
| 2021-06-24 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
| 2021-06-24 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
| 2021-06-24 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number M51451, dated December 9, 2020, is dismissed with costs in the fixed amount of $5,000.00. Dismissed, with costs |
|
| 2021-05-25 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court | |
| 2021-05-25 | Correspondence received from, (Letter Form), Correspondence further to update pursuant to Rule 92.1, (Printed version due on 2021-06-01) | Angela Elizabeth Van |
| 2021-05-21 | Correspondence received from, (Letter Form), Correspondence further to update pursuant to Rule 92.1, (Printed version due on 2021-05-31) | David Palombi |
| 2021-05-19 | Correspondence received from, (Letter Form), Correspondence further to update pursuant to Rule 92.1, (Printed version due on 2021-05-27) | Angela Elizabeth Van |
| 2021-05-18 |
Supplemental document, (Letter Form), Update pursuant to Rule 92.1 supplemental document 02: brief history of the access issue supplemental document 03: email of Dr. Shenfield, (Printed version due on 2021-05-26) |
David Palombi |
| 2021-05-11 | Supplemental document, (Letter Form), Update pursuant to Rule 92.1, (Printed version due on 2021-05-18) | Angela Elizabeth Van |
| 2021-04-21 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), (Printed version filed on 2021-04-23) | Angela Elizabeth Van |
| 2021-04-21 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2021-04-28, (Printed version filed on 2021-04-23) | Angela Elizabeth Van |
| 2021-03-25 | Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED 03/25/21 | |
| 2021-02-05 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), (Printed version due on 2021-02-12) | David Palombi |
| 2021-02-05 |
Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), (2 volumes), Missing: -Amended Notice of Application (rec'd 2021-05-18) -Filing Fee, Completed on: 2021-05-26, (Electronic version due on 2021-02-12) |
David Palombi |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Palombi, David | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Van, Angela Elizabeth | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Palombi, David
Counsel
3100 Steeles Avenue West
Suite 211
Concord, Ontario
L4K 3R1
Telephone: (905) 738-2101
FAX: (905) 738-1168
Email: patdimonte@on.aibn.com
Party: Van, Angela Elizabeth
Counsel
Christopher Yu
8395 Jane Street
Suite 101
Vaughan, Ontario
L4K 5Y2
Telephone: (905) 669-2109
FAX: (905) 669-2692
Email: rachel.radley@radleylaw.ca
Summary
Keywords
Family law — Custody and access — Courts — Jurisdiction — Superior Court of Justice (Family Court) making final order in a proceeding brought under Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 3 (2nd Supp.) and Children’s Law Reform Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.12 — Divisional Court dismissing motion to transfer appeal to Court of Appeal and dismissing appeal for want of jurisdiction —Court of Appeal refusing leave to appeal — What is the proper jurisdiction for an appeal from a final order of the Ontario Superior Court Justice in Family Court where the amount in dispute is less than $50,000.00 exclusive of costs? — Whether a single justice sitting as a motion judge in Divisional Court has jurisdiction to dismiss an appeal of a final order on the grounds that the appeal has no merit — Whether a justice should dismiss a motion to transfer an appeal to the Court of Appeal when the parties have consented to the transfer — Whether the Divisional Court exercised its discretion judicially and correctly in law in applying the three part test in Dunnington v. 656956 Ontario Ltd. (1992), 9 O.R. (3d) 124 — Whether the Divisional Court erred in dismissing the appeal as being without merit when the justice did not read the appeal books and other material inasmuch as they were not before him.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
The parties were married and had two children together. They separated in 2010. A number of issues went to trial, after which the trial judge issued a final order on custody, access, child support and related matters. The applicant filed an appeal in the Divisional Court and, later, a motion to transfer his appeal to the Court of Appeal. The Divisional Court dismissed his motion and his appeal. The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal.
Lower court rulings
Ontario Superior Court of Justice
FC-10-037022-02
Applicant’s motion to transfer appeal to Court of Appeal dismissed. Applicant’s appeal dismissed.
Court of Appeal for Ontario
M51451
Applicant’s application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Filed documents
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available