Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


39899

Bank of Montreal v. Attorney General of Canada

(Federal) (Civil) (By Leave)

(Sealing order) (Certain information not available to the public)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2022-04-07 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2022-04-07 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2022-04-07 Close file on Leave
2022-04-07 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A-290-20, 2021 FCA 189, dated September 21, 2021, is dismissed with costs.
Dismissed, with costs
2022-02-28 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court
2022-01-31 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23B - Reply, (Printed version filed on 2022-02-01) Bank of Montreal
2022-01-31 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Book Form), Completed on: 2022-02-23, (Printed version filed on 2022-02-01) Bank of Montreal
2022-01-19 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23B, (Printed version due on 2022-01-26) Attorney General of Canada
2022-01-19 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A, (Printed version due on 2022-01-26) Attorney General of Canada
2022-01-19 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), SEALED-RESTRICTED, Completed on: 2022-02-23, (Electronic version filed on 2022-03-02) Attorney General of Canada
2021-12-08 Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete application for leave to appeal and without formal Court of Appeal order, FILE OPENED 2021-12-08
2021-11-22 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23B, (Printed version filed on 2021-11-22) Bank of Montreal
2021-11-22 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A, (Printed version filed on 2021-11-22) Bank of Montreal
2021-11-22 Notice of name, (Letter Form), (Printed version filed on 2021-11-22) Bank of Montreal
2021-11-22 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), SEALED

Require Court of Appeal Order, Completed on: 2022-01-17, (Printed version filed on 2021-11-22)
Bank of Montreal

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Bank of Montreal Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Attorney General of Canada Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Bank of Montreal

Counsel
Andrew Bernstein
Martha MacDonald
Torys LLP
79 Wellington St. West
Suite 3000, Box 270, TD South Tower
Toronto, Ontario
M5K 1N2
Telephone: (416) 865-7678
FAX: (416) 865-7380
Email: abernstein@torys.com
Agent
Marie-France Major
Supreme Advocacy LLP
100- 340 Gilmour Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0R3
Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 102
FAX: (613) 695-8580
Email: mfmajor@supremeadvocacy.ca

Party: Attorney General of Canada

Counsel
Michael Ezri
Nancy Arnold
Andrea Jackett
Jesse Epp-Fransen
Department of Justice Canada
Ontario Regional Office
120 Adelaide Street West, Suite 400
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 1T1
Telephone: (647) 256-7368
FAX: (416) 973-0810
Email: michael.ezri@justice.gc.ca
Agent
Christopher Rupar
Department of Justice
Civil Litigation Branch, East Tower
234 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
Telephone: (613) 941-2351
FAX: (613) 954-1920
Email: crupar@justice.gc.ca

Summary

Keywords

Taxation — Goods and services tax — Calculating input tax credits — Qualifying institutions — Whether appellate court applied correct legal test to assess Minister’s determination of use of business inputs for purposes of determining input tax credits to calculate GST payable — Whether Minister’s power to deny a method for calculating GST payable should be reviewed on correctness standard.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

(SEALING ORDER) (CERTAIN INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC)

In 2008, Parliament amended the income tax credit regime by enacting s. 141.02 of the Excise Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. E 15. That section creates two categories of financial institutions: qualifying institutions, including large Canadian banks like the applicant Bank of Montreal (“BMO”), and non qualifying institutions. Qualifying institutions may apply for approval of their proposed method for computing their input tax credits in advance of each fiscal year. If the Minister denies approval, a deemed rate of 12 percent is applied. The Minister of National Revenue’s decision is not subject to appeal to the Tax Court of Canada, but denials must be accompanied by reasons and are subject to judicial review by the Federal Court.

BMO provides financial services to its Canadian clients. Those services are exempt supplies, so BMO is not entitled to claim income tax credits for the GST it pays for inputs used to provide those services. (“Supplies”, in this context, include the sale, lease or other provision of a property or service.) It also provides services to non-residents, which are generally taxable, zero rated supplies, so BMO can claim income tax credits for the GST it incurs on inputs used to provide those financial services. BMO applied to the Minister for approval of a method to compute its income tax credits for its 2018 fiscal year. By letter with a detailed attachment, the Minister denied BMO’s application. The Minister accepted significant parts of the proposed computation method, but detailed a number of problems which resulted in excessive input tax credits, such that BMO’s proposed method did not reasonably approximate the goods and services BMO used to make its taxable supplies.

The application for judicial review was dismissed based on the standard of reasonableness. The Minister’s denial of BMO’s 2018 application was found to fall within the scope of the authority granted by s. 141.02(20) of the Excise Tax Act. BMO’s appeal was dismissed.

Lower court rulings

November 26, 2020
Federal Court

2020 FC 1014, T-901-19

Application for judicial review dismissed

September 21, 2021
Federal Court of Appeal

2021 FCA 189, A-290-20

Appeal dismissed

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27