Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


39912

Gershon (Jerry) Greif, in his capacity as liquidator of the estate of the late Tauba (Tusia) Magien v. Samuel Luft

(Quebec) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2022-04-27 Close file on Leave
2022-04-21 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2022-04-21 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2022-04-21 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Quebec (Montréal), Number 500-09-028229-193, 2021 QCCA 1387, dated September 14, 2021 is dismissed.
Dismissed
2022-03-21 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court
2022-02-25 Notice of name Samuel Luft
2022-02-25 Certificate (on limitations to public access) Samuel Luft
2022-02-03 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2022-02-21, (Printed version filed on 2022-02-11) Gershon (Jerry) Greif, in his capacity as liquidator of the estate of the late Tauba (Tusia) Magien
2022-01-24 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Letter Form), require: form 23A, form 14 (rec'd 2022-02-25), Completed on: 2022-03-18, (Printed version filed on 2022-01-24) Samuel Luft
2021-12-13 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED 2021-12-13
2021-11-12 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), (Printed version filed on 2021-11-16) Gershon (Jerry) Greif, in his capacity as liquidator of the estate of the late Tauba (Tusia) Magien
2021-11-12 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), (5 volumes), Completed on: 2021-11-12, (Printed version filed on 2021-11-16) Gershon (Jerry) Greif, in his capacity as liquidator of the estate of the late Tauba (Tusia) Magien

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Gershon (Jerry) Greif, in his capacity as liquidator of the estate of the late Tauba (Tusia) Magien Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Luft, Samuel Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Gershon (Jerry) Greif, in his capacity as liquidator of the estate of the late Tauba (Tusia) Magien

Counsel
Julius H. Grey
Michaëlla Bouchard-Racine
Edward Figlarz
Grey Casgrain, s.e.n.c.
1155 René-Lévesque Ouest
Suite 1715
Montréal, Quebec
H3B 2K8
Telephone: (514) 288-6180 Ext: 229
FAX: (514) 288-8908
Email: jhgrey@greycasgrain.net

Party: Luft, Samuel

Counsel
Jean Lemoine
Samuel Lalancette
Ravinsky Ryan Lemoine s.e.n.c.r.l.
Place du Canada - Bureau 2100
1010, rue De La Gauchetière Ouest
Montréal, Quebec
H3B 2N2
Telephone: (514) 866-3514
FAX: (514) 866-0038
Email: jlemoine@ravinskyryan.com

Summary

Keywords

Prescription — Extinctive prescription — Suspension — Impossibility to act — Whether an elderly person who is vulnerable and in a relationship of trust with a family member is in the impossibility to act, in the sense of art. 2904 of the Civil Code of Québec — Whether money that is borrowed from a vulnerable elderly person can be acquired through extinctive prescription, given the law of trusts — Whether the Court of Appeal erred in changing the date that prescription started running against the applicant, given that the trial judge fixed the date after the hearing and evaluating the credibility of all other evidence.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

The applicant, Gershon (Jerry) Greif, is the son and sole heir and liquidator of the estate of his deceased mother, Tauba Magien Greif (“Tusia”). The respondent, Samuel Luft, is the nephew by marriage of Tusia and was a financial portfolio manager. After Tusia’s death in 2014, the applicant found financial documents suggesting Tusia had given large sums of money to the respondent. The applicant sent a mise en demeure in September 2016 and instituted an action against the respondent claiming the unpaid sums of $852,552 in October 2016. The respondent claimed he had paid back everything owed. He also pleaded that the action was prescribed since his last payment to Tusia dated back to 2004 and he had given her a statement of account at that time summarizing all money refunded.

The Superior Court of Quebec granted the applicant’s action in part and ordered the respondent to pay the applicant $541,593.44. It held the action was not prescribed since the applicant only discovered the claim in 2014. It rejected the argument that the prescriptive period began running in 2004, since Tusia was in the impossibility to act, which suspended the period. The Quebec Court of Appeal unanimously allowed the appeal and dismissed the action, holding that the action was prescribed. The conclusion that Tusia was in the impossibility to act thereby suspending prescription was incompatible with the evidence.

Lower court rulings

February 28, 2019
Superior Court of Quebec

2019 QCCS 637, 500-17-096167-161

Applicant’s action granted in part; respondent’s application to dismiss action as abusive and frivolous dismissed; declaration that action not prescribed; respondent ordered to pay applicant sum of $541,593.44




September 14, 2021
Court of Appeal of Quebec (Montréal)

2021 QCCA 1387, 500-09-028229-193

Appeal allowed, action dismissed

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27