Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


41154

Bradley Barton v. His Majesty the King

(Alberta) (Criminal) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2024-08-16 Close file on Leave
2024-08-08 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2024-08-08 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2024-08-08 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Alberta (Edmonton), Number 2103-0187A, 2024 ABCA 34, dated January 29, 2024, is dismissed.
Dismissed
2024-06-03 Correspondence received from, Concerning the summary His Majesty the King
2024-05-27 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court
2024-04-05 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23B Bradley Barton
2024-04-05 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2024-04-05, (Printed version filed on 2024-04-05) Bradley Barton
2024-04-04 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23B His Majesty the King
2024-04-04 Certificate (on limitations to public access), 23A His Majesty the King
2024-04-04 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2024-04-04, (Printed version filed on 2024-04-05) His Majesty the King
2024-03-12 Correspondence received from, Order of counsel His Majesty the King
2024-03-08 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal
2024-03-06 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23B Bradley Barton
2024-03-06 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A Bradley Barton
2024-03-06 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2024-03-06, (Printed version filed on 2024-03-06) Bradley Barton

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Barton, Bradley Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
His Majesty the King Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Barton, Bradley

Counsel
Name
Peter Sankoff
Contact information
Sankoff Criminal Law
Ritchie Mill
10171 Saskatchewan Dr NW #414
Edmonton, Alberta
T6E 4R5
Telephone: (780) 655-1611
Email: peter@sankoffcriminallaw.com
Agent
Name
Moira Dillon
Contact information
Supreme Law Group
440 Laurier Ave. West
Suite 200
Ottawa, Ontario
K1R 7X6
Telephone: (613) 691-1224
FAX: (613) 691-1338
Email: mdillon@supremelawgroup.ca

Party: His Majesty the King

Counsel
Names
Christine Rideout, K.C.
Sarah Clive
Contact information
Attorney General of Alberta
3rd Floor, Centrium Place
300 - 332 6 Avenue, S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 0B2
Telephone: (403) 297-6005
FAX: (403) 297-3453
Email: christine.rideout@gov.ab.ca
Agent
Name
D. Lynne Watt
Contact information
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
160 Elgin Street
Suite 2600
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 786-8695
FAX: (613) 788-3509
Email: lynne.watt@gowlingwlg.com

Summary

Keywords

Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Arbitrary detention — Investigative detention — Search and seizure — Ancillary power to seize pursuant to investigative detention — Criminal law — Offences — Elements of offence — Sexual assault — Consent — Vitiation of consent —Evidence — Whether consent to sexual activity is vitiated where significant bodily harm was caused but harm was not objectively foreseeable — Whether Court of Appeal erred in using ancillary powers doctrine to legitimize seizure of personal bag during investigative detention — Whether Court of Appeal erred in applying ancillary powers doctrine to legitimize three hours of an investigative detention?

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

Cindy Gladue was found deceased in Mr. Barton’s hotel room. She bled to death from an 11-centimetre laceration of her vaginal wall. Mr. Barton was tried before a jury for unlawful act manslaughter. Whether Ms. Gladue consented to the sexual act that caused her injury and, if so, whether her consent was vitiated were among the issues argued at trial. Evidence obtained by police during Mr. Barton’s investigative detention was admitted at trial. A jury convicted Mr. Barton of manslaughter. The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal.

Lower court rulings

December 11, 2020
Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta

2020 ABQB 774

Conviction for manslaughter

January 29, 2024
Court of Appeal of Alberta (Edmonton)

2024 ABCA 34

Appeal dismissed

Filed documents

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27