Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


41261

Lexlixatkwa7 Nelson v. His Majesty the King

(British Columbia) (Criminal) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2024-08-30 Close file on Leave
2024-08-29 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2024-08-29 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2024-08-29 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Number CA48787, 2024 BCCA 72, dated March 6, 2024, is dismissed.
Dismissed
2024-07-15 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court
2024-06-24 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Book Form), Completed on: 2024-06-26, (Printed version filed on 2024-06-25) Lexlixatkwa7 Nelson
2024-06-12 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A, (Printed version filed on 2024-06-13) His Majesty the King
2024-06-12 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2024-06-12, (Printed version filed on 2024-06-13) His Majesty the King
2024-05-14 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED
2024-05-06 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), Form 23A, (Printed version filed on 2024-05-07) Lexlixatkwa7 Nelson
2024-05-06 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2024-05-06, (Printed version filed on 2024-05-07) Lexlixatkwa7 Nelson

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Nelson, Lexlixatkwa7 Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
His Majesty the King Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Nelson, Lexlixatkwa7

Counsel
Erica J. Olmstead
Edelmann & Company Law Corporation
905 - 207 West Hastings Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6B 1H7
Telephone: (604) 646-4684
FAX: (604) 648-8043
Email: erica@edelmann.ca
Agent
Michael J. Sobkin
331 Somerset Street West
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0J8
Telephone: (613) 282-1712
FAX: (613) 288-2896
Email: msobkin@sympatico.ca

Party: His Majesty the King

Counsel
Lesley A. Ruzicka, K.C.
Attorney General of British Columbia
B.C. Prosecution Service
3rd Floor, 940 Blanshard Street
Victoria, British Columbia
V8W 3E6
Telephone: (250) 387-0284
FAX: (250) 387-4262
Email: lesley.ruzicka@gov.bc.ca
Agent
Matthew Estabrooks
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
160 Elgin Street, Suite 2600
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 786-0211
FAX: (613) 788-3573
Email: matthew.estabrooks@gowlingwlg.com

Summary

Keywords

Criminal law — Sentencing — Indigenous offenders — Considerations — Whether, and to what extent, Indigenous laws ought to play a role in the application of R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688, in sentencing — Whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that there was insufficient evidence of Indigenous laws that were relevant to the determination of a fit sentence — How should sentencing courts incorporate Indigenous laws in determining fit sentences?

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

The applicant, Lexlixatkwa7 Nelson, pleaded guilty to common law criminal contempt after having violated an injunction related to a protest. The sentencing judge declined to grant a discharge but suspended the passing of sentence and placed the applicant on probation for 12 months with a requirement to complete 50 hours of community service. The sentencing judge concluded that he was bound by the principles of judicial comity and horizontal stare decisis not to impose a lower sentence, despite having a strong inclination to do so on account of the applicant’s strongly held beliefs and connection to her Indigenous culture.

The Court of Appeal held that the sentencing judge erred in concluding that he was bound by judicial comity or stare decisis. However, a proper application of the Gladue analysis did not establish that the sentence was unfit. While the applicant’s Indigenous heritage and belief in Indigenous laws explain her reasons for attending the protest site, they do not explain why she engaged in the illegal conduct of flouting the injunction. The Court of Appeal dismissed the sentencing appeal.

Lower court rulings

November 30, 2022
Supreme Court of British Columbia

S211602, 2022 BCSC 2328

Sentence imposed for common law contempt. The passing of sentence was suspended and the contemnor was placed on probation for 12 months, with an obligation to complete 50 hours of community service work.

March 6, 2024
Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver)

2024 BCCA 72

Appeal from sentence dismissed.

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27