Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
41482
Laksaman Fernando Mihindukulasuriya v. Aramark Canada Limited
(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-02 | Close file on Leave | |
| 2025-05-01 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal is granted. The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the response to the application for leave to appeal and to the motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal is granted. The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number COA-24-OM-0094, dated April 5, 2024, is dismissed with costs. Dismissed, with costs |
|
| 2025-05-01 | Decision on motion to extend time, See decision on application. | |
| 2025-05-01 | Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application, See decision on application. | |
| 2025-03-31 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court | |
| 2025-03-31 | Submission of motion to extend time, to file a response, for consideration by the Court | |
| 2025-03-31 | Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, for consideration by the Court | |
| 2024-12-10 | Affidavit, in support of motion, (Printed version filed on 2024-12-23) | Aramark Canada Limited |
| 2024-12-10 |
Motion to extend time, (Book Form), to file a response Missing: -Proof of service (rec'd 2024-12-11), Completed on: 2024-12-11, (Printed version filed on 2024-12-23) |
Aramark Canada Limited |
| 2024-12-10 |
Certificate (on limitations to public access), 23A Need amended version (rec'd 2024-12-10), (Printed version filed on 2024-12-23) |
Aramark Canada Limited |
| 2024-12-10 | Response to the motion to extend the time to file and / or serve the leave application, (Letter Form), (Included in the respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal), Missing motion to extend time (rec'd 2024-12-10), Completed on: 2024-12-11, (Printed version filed on 2024-12-23) | Aramark Canada Limited |
| 2024-12-10 |
Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Letter Form), Missing -Motion to extend time (rec'd 2024-12-10) -Amended Form 23A (rec'd 2024-12-10), Completed on: 2024-12-11, (Printed version filed on 2024-12-23) |
Aramark Canada Limited |
| 2024-10-21 | Correspondence received from, about Court orders | Laksaman Fernando Mihindukulasuriya |
| 2024-10-11 | Supplemental document, Information about condition | Laksaman Fernando Mihindukulasuriya |
| 2024-10-04 | Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2024-10-18 | Laksaman Fernando Mihindukulasuriya |
| 2024-10-03 | Letter advising parties of an incomplete application for leave to appeal, File opened on Oct. 3, 2024 | |
| 2024-07-30 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), Public access to information form | Laksaman Fernando Mihindukulasuriya |
| 2024-07-30 |
Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Missing: -Amended cover page indicating coordinates of the other parties (rec'd 2024-10-04) -Amended notice of application (indicating the correct name of court appealed from and the coordinates of the other party) (rec'd 2024-10-08) -Amended memorandum of arguments (including Part IV and V + signature) (rec'd 2024-10-08) -CA Order (N/A) -Trial Court judgement (rec'd 2024-10-08) - Trial court Order (N/A) -Proof of service (rec'd 2024-10-09) -Motion to extend time (rec'd 2024-10-04) , Completed on: 2024-10-21 |
Laksaman Fernando Mihindukulasuriya |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Mihindukulasuriya, Laksaman Fernando | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Aramark Canada Limited | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Mihindukulasuriya, Laksaman Fernando
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Aramark Canada Limited
Counsel
333 Bay Street
Suite 2500
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 2R2
Telephone: (416) 408-5505
FAX: (416) 408-4814
Email: lfreitag@filion.on.ca
Summary
Keywords
Human rights — Judicial review — Discrimination — Whether an extension of time to seek leave to appeal should have been granted.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
The applicant had sought to commence an application for judicial review of a 2016 decision of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario more than five years later. His motion for an extension of time to seek judicial review was dismissed. The applicant’s subsequent motion for an extension of time to seek leave to appeal was also dismissed.
Lower court rulings
Application and motion for an extension of time dismissed
Court of Appeal for Ontario
COA-24-OM-0094
Application for an extension of time to seek leave to appeal dismissed
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available