Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


41756

Angela Davidson v. His Majesty the King

(British Columbia) (Criminal) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2025-10-09 Close file on Leave
2025-09-19 Close file on Leave
2025-09-18 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2025-09-18 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2025-09-18 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Number CA49830, 2025 BCCA 111, dated April 9, 2025, is dismissed.
Dismissed
2025-08-18 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court
2025-08-08 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Book Form), Completed on: 2025-08-11, (Printed version filed on 2025-08-13) Angela Davidson
2025-07-31 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A, (Printed version filed on 2025-07-31) His Majesty the King
2025-07-31 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2025-07-31, (Printed version filed on 2025-07-31) His Majesty the King
2025-06-06 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2025-06-06, (Printed version filed on 2025-06-17) Angela Davidson
2025-04-14 Letter acknowledging receipt of a notice of application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED
2025-04-09 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A, (Printed version due on 2025-04-16) Angela Davidson
2025-04-09 Notice of application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2025-06-06, (Printed version due on 2025-04-16) Angela Davidson

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Davidson, Angela Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
His Majesty the King Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Davidson, Angela

Counsel
Names
Benjamin Isitt
Jessica Wegg
Contact information
Benjamin Isitt Law Corporation
2547 Prior Street
Victoria, British Columbia
V8T 3X5
Telephone: (250) 882-9302
FAX: (236) 470-4276
Email: ben@isitt.ca
Agent
Name
Michael Sobkin
Contact information
Michael Sobkin Law Corporation
331 Somerset Street West
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0J8
Telephone: (613) 282-1712
FAX: (613) 288-2896
Email: msobkin@sympatico.ca

Party: His Majesty the King

Counsel
Name
Lesley Ruzicka, K.C.
Contact information
B.C. Prosecution Service
Criminal Appeals and Special Prosecutions
3rd Floor, 940 Blanshard Street
Victoria, British Columbia
V8W 3E6
Telephone: (778) 974-5156
FAX: (250) 387-4262
Email: lesley.ruzicka@gov.bc.ca
Agent
Name
Matthew Estabrooks
Contact information
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
2600 – 160 Elgin Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 786-0211
FAX: (613) 563-9869
Email: matthew.estabrooks@gowlingwlg.com

Summary

Keywords

Criminal law — Sentencing Indigenous offenders — Considerations — Whether lower courts failed to recognize or give sufficient weight to Ms. Davidson’s reduced moral culpability on account of her Aboriginal perspective and distinct personal circumstances as a Kwakwaka'wakw Indigenous person and trained land guardian – Whether Court of Appeal erred in principle in failing to properly apply s. 718.2 (e) of the Criminal Code and this Court’s guidance in R. v. Sparrow, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1075, R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688, Mitchell v. M. N.R., 2001 SCC 33 and R. v. Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13 — Extent to which an Indigenous person’s Aboriginal perspective ought to bear on the courts’ assessment of moral culpability when fashioning a fit sentence for criminal contempt — Whether Court of Appeal erred in failing to accord sufficient weight to strict bail conditions as a mitigating factor.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

The applicant opposed the old-growth logging on southern Vancouver Island. The applicant is a Kwakwaka’wakw (Da’naxda’xw) person and a member of the Da’naxda’xw First Nation. Since 2022, she has served as Deputy Leader of the Green Party of Canada. She was convicted of seven counts of criminal contempt of court. The applicant received a cumulative sentence of 60 days’ imprisonment (less 12 days’ credit for pre-sentence custody), plus 18 months’ probation with 75 hours of community work service. The appeal was allowed and the sentence was varied. The Court of Appeal imposed a cumulative sentence of 51 days’ imprisonment, 18 months’ probation, and 75 hours of community service.

Lower court rulings

January 18, 2024
Supreme Court of British Columbia

2024 BCSC 81

Sentence imposed: cumulative sentence of 60 days’ imprisonment (less 12 days’ credit for pre-sentence custody), plus 18 months’ probation with 75 hours of community service

April 9, 2025
Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver)

2025 BCCA 111

Appeal allowed; sentence varied: cumulative sentence of 51 days’ imprisonment, 18 months’ probation, and 75 hours of community service

Filed documents

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-10-18