Docket

27547

Ian Vincent Golden v. Her Majesty the Queen

(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

Proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2002-01-17 Record returned to the Registrar of the Court of Appeal
2002-01-07 Appeal closed
2002-01-07 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties
2001-12-13 Copy of formal judgment being prepared
2001-12-07 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties
2001-12-06 Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ L'HD G Ia Ma Ba Bi Arb LeB, The appeal is allowed and the judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal is set aside. The appellant's conviction is overturned and an acquittal is entered. The Chief Justice and L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier and Bastarache JJ. are dissenting.
Allowed
2001-03-05 Transcript received, and distributed to the judges (101 pages)
2001-02-15 Judgment reserved OR rendered with reasons to follow
2001-02-15 Hearing of the appeal, 2001-02-15, (V014-016), CJ L'HD G Ia Ma Ba Bi Arb LeB
Judgment reserved
2001-02-15 Acknowledgement and consent for video taping of proceedings
2001-02-15 Respondent's condensed book Her Majesty the Queen
2001-02-12 Appellant's condensed book Ian Vincent Golden
2001-02-09 Notice of appearance, of Donald McLeod and Julian Roy at the hearing of the appeal African Canadian Legal Clinic
2001-02-02 Notice of appearance Her Majesty the Queen
2001-01-30 Appellant's book of authorities, (additional) - vol. 4, Completed on: 2001-01-30 Ian Vincent Golden
2001-01-09 Order on motion for leave to intervene, (oral argument granted by Binnie J.)
2001-01-08 Notice of hearing Ian Vincent Golden
2000-12-18 Book of authorities, Completed on: 2000-12-18 Attorney General for Ontario
2000-12-18 Decision on miscellaneous motion, DeRg, on behalf of the intervener Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto Inc. for an order allowing its factum to be filed without marginal numbering.
Granted, no order as to costs
2000-12-18 Submission of miscellaneous motion, DeRg
2000-12-15 Book of authorities, Completed on: 2000-12-15 Canadian Civil Liberties Association
2000-12-15 Correspondence received from, K. Murray dated Dec. 15, 2000 (fax copy) re: requesting to present oral argument Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto Inc.
2000-12-13 Response to miscellaneous motion, from M. Pistyner dated Dec. 7/00 (included in Motion Book), Completed on: 2000-12-13 Her Majesty the Queen
2000-12-13 Response to miscellaneous motion, from D. Tanovich dated Dec. 7/00 (included in Motion Book), Completed on: 2000-12-13 Ian Vincent Golden
2000-12-13 Notice of miscellaneous motion, to file the factum without marginal line numbering (book form), Completed on: 2000-12-13 Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto Inc.
2000-12-12 Intervener's factum, Completed on: 2000-12-12 Attorney General for Ontario
2000-12-12 Correspondence received from, S. Scott dated Dec. 12/00 (by fax) re: seeking leave to present 15 minutes of oral argument (original received on Jan. 4, 2001) African Canadian Legal Clinic
2000-12-11 Intervener's factum, Completed on: 2000-12-11 Canadian Civil Liberties Association
2000-12-07 Intervener's factum, Completed on: 2000-12-07 Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police (CACP)
2000-12-06 Book of authorities, Vol. I & II, Completed on: 2000-12-06 Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto Inc.
2000-12-06 Intervener's factum, (no marginal line numbering - motion requested), Completed on: 2000-12-06 Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto Inc.
2000-12-06 Book of authorities, Completed on: 2000-12-06 African Canadian Legal Clinic
2000-12-06 Intervener's factum, Completed on: 2000-12-06 African Canadian Legal Clinic
2000-12-01 Appeal hearing scheduled, 2001-02-15
Judgment reserved
2000-11-14 Appeal perfected for hearing, Session beginning on 2001-01-15
2000-11-10 Correspondence received from, Kimberly R. Murray (by fax) dated Nov. 10/00 re: Chantal Tie acting as Agent Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto Inc.
2000-11-09 Respondent's factum, Incomplete Her Majesty the Queen
2000-11-07 Order on motion for leave to intervene, (revised order by the Court)
2000-10-30 Order on motion for leave to intervene, (by the Court)
2000-10-30 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Bi, by the ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO. The factum is limited to 20 pages. The request to present oral argument is deferred to a rota judge following receipt and consideration of the written arguments of the parties and interveners(15 minutes granted Jan.9, 01). The intervener shall not be entitled to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties. Pursuant to Rule 18(6) the intervener shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by the intervention.(revised Nov.7)
Granted, no order as to costs
2000-10-30 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, Bi
2000-10-11 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, Completed on: 2000-10-11 Her Majesty the Queen
2000-09-15 Appellant's book of authorities, Vol. I to III (vol. 4 filed on Jan. 30, 2001 - supplemental), Completed on: 2000-09-15 Ian Vincent Golden
2000-09-15 Appellant's factum, (see order dated June 14, 2000), Completed on: 2000-09-15 Ian Vincent Golden
2000-09-05 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, from Gowling, Lafleur (fax copy), Completed on: 2000-09-05 Ian Vincent Golden
2000-09-01 Motion for leave to intervene, (see letter sent by the Court dated June 29, 2000) - 2 copies, Completed on: 2000-09-01 Attorney General for Ontario
2000-08-01 Correspondence received, from M. Bloos dated July 27, 2000 re: acknowledge receipt of L. Meagher's letter - intervention
2000-06-29 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, Alan D. Gold; Marvin Bloos; Charles Davison; Barry Gorlick; Eugene Meehan; Stephen Grace; Brian A. Crane; Robert E. Houston; Robert J. Frater; Manon Guitard; Sylvie Roussel; re: intervention by Sept. 1
2000-06-29 Order on motion for leave to intervene, (BY THE COURT)
2000-06-29 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Bi, by the AFRICAN CANADIAN LEGAL CLINIC. The applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length. The request to present oral argument is deferred to a rota judge following receipt and consideration of the writtten arguments of the parties and interveners (15 minutes granted Jan. 9/01). The interveners shall not be entitled to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record apart from their factums and oral submissions. Pursuant to rule 18(6) the interveners shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by the interventions.
Granted, no order as to costs
2000-06-29 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Bi, by the CANADIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION. The applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length. The request to present oral argument is deferred to a rota judge following receipt and consideration of the writtten arguments of the parties and interveners (15 minutes granted Jan. 9/01). The interveners shall not be entitled to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record apart from their factums and oral submissions. Pursuant to rule 18(6) the interveners shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by the interventions.
Granted, no order as to costs
2000-06-29 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Bi, by the CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS OF POLICE. The applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length. The request to present oral argument is deferred to a rota judge following receipt and consideration of the writtten arguments of the parties and interveners (15 minutes granted Jan. 9/01). The interveners shall not be entitled to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record apart from their factums and oral submissions. Pursuant to rule 18(6) the interveners shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by the interventions.
Granted, no order as to costs
2000-06-29 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Bi, by the ABORIGINAL LEGAL SERVICES OF TORONTO INC. The applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length. The request to present oral argument is deferred to a rota judge following receipt and consideration of the writtten arguments of the parties and interveners (15 minutes granted Jan. 9/01). The interveners shall not be entitled to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record apart from their factums and oral submissions. Pursuant to rule 18(6) the interveners shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by the interventions.
Granted, no order as to costs
2000-06-29 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, by (ALST) (CACP) (CCLA) & (ACLC), Bi
2000-06-29 Reply to the motion for leave to intervene, from K. R. Murray dated June 29/00 (by fax)(original received on July 4, 2000), Completed on: 2000-06-29 Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto Inc.
2000-06-28 Reply to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from D. Migicovsky dated June 27, 2000 (fax copy), Completed on: 2000-06-28 Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police (CACP)
2000-06-27 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from Gowlings dated June 26/00, Completed on: 2000-06-27 Ian Vincent Golden
2000-06-22 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from M. Pistyner dated June 21/00 re: does not oppose the inverventions and suggests term conditions, Completed on: 2000-06-22 Her Majesty the Queen
2000-06-16 Order on motion to state a constitutional question, (by the Court)
2000-06-16 Decision on the motion to state a constitutional question, CJ, The application is dismissed on the ground that this case does not raise constitutional questions within the terms of Rule 32 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada.
Dismissed, no order as to costs
2000-06-14 Order on motion to extend time
2000-06-14 Decision on motion to extend time, Reg, to serve & file the appellant's factum to Oct. 1, 2000. The extension of time is granted to September 18, 2000.
Allowed in part, no order as to costs
2000-06-14 Submission of motion to extend time, Reg
2000-06-12 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from Gowling, Strathy & Henderson dated June 12/00, Completed on: 2000-06-12 Ian Vincent Golden
2000-06-12 Motion for leave to intervene, (book form), Completed on: 2000-06-12 African Canadian Legal Clinic
2000-06-12 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, from D.M. Tanovich dated June 8/00 (Tab 2 of Motion Record), Completed on: 2000-06-12 Ian Vincent Golden
2000-06-12 Motion for leave to intervene, (book form), Completed on: 2000-06-12 Canadian Civil Liberties Association
2000-06-09 Motion for leave to intervene, to file a factum and present oral argument (book form), Completed on: 2000-06-09 Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police (CACP)
2000-06-09 Response to motion to extend time, Completed on: 2000-06-09 Her Majesty the Queen
2000-06-07 Appellant's record, Completed on: 2000-06-09 Ian Vincent Golden
2000-06-06 Motion to extend time, (Letter Form), to serve and file the factum to Oct. 10/00 (1 copy), Completed on: 2000-06-06 Ian Vincent Golden
2000-05-08 Motion for leave to intervene, (book form), Completed on: 2000-05-08 Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto Inc.
2000-04-25 Submission of motion to state a constitutional question, CJ
2000-04-20 Response to the motion to state a constitutional question, (Letter Form), from R. Frater dated April 18, 2000, Completed on: 2000-04-20 Her Majesty the Queen
2000-04-20 Appeal court record, (1 small box)
2000-04-19 Reply to the motion to state a constitutional question, (Letter Form), from D. Tanovich dated April 19, 2000 (fax copy), Completed on: 2000-04-19 Ian Vincent Golden
2000-04-13 Letter acknowledging receipt of notice of appeal
2000-04-10 Motion to state a constitutional question, Completed on: 2000-04-10 Ian Vincent Golden
2000-04-10 Notice of appeal, Completed on: 2000-04-10 Ian Vincent Golden
2000-04-05 Order granting leave to appeal
2000-03-24 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties
2000-03-23 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal is granted.
Granted, no order as to costs
2000-01-24 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, G Bi Arb
1999-11-23 Order on motion to leave to intervene, (by the Court)
1999-11-23 Decision on motion for leave to intervene, Arb, The motion for leave to intervene by the Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto Inc. in the application for leave to appeal is dismissed, without prejudice to the right of the applicant to move to intervene in the appeal itself, if leave to appeal is granted.
Dismissed, no order as to costs
1999-11-22 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, Arb
1999-11-18 Reply to the motion for leave to intervene., from K. Roach dated Nov. 18/99 (by fax), Completed on: 1999-11-18 Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto Inc.
1999-11-17 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, Completed on: 1999-11-17 Ian Vincent Golden
1999-11-12 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, Completed on: 1999-11-12 Ian Vincent Golden
1999-11-10 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (book form), Completed on: 1999-11-10 Her Majesty the Queen
1999-11-08 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 1999-11-08 Her Majesty the Queen
1999-11-05 Motion for leave to intervene, (book form), Incomplete Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto Inc.
1999-10-15 Application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 1999-10-15 Ian Vincent Golden