Bell Canada, et al. v. Attorney General of Canada
(Federal Court) (Civil) (By Leave)
Administrative law - Judicial review, Standard of review, Boards and tribunals, Jurisdiction, Legislation, Interpretation - Administrative law - Judicial review - Standard of review - Boards and tribunals - Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (“CRTC”) - Jurisdiction - Legislation - Interpretation - Intellectual property - Copyright - Commercial law - International trade - What is the standard of appellate review - What is the standard of judicial review in relation to the Broadcasting Act issue - What is the standard of review in relation to the Copyright Act issue - Broadcasting Act, S.C. 1991, c. 11 - Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42.
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
The CRTC issued an Order excluding the Super Bowl from the simultaneous substitution regime to which it has been subject for many years under the Simultaneous Programming Service Deletion and Substitution Regulations, S.O.R/2015-240. Under that regulatory regime, the Canadian broadcaster of the Super Bowl made requests to ensure that the Super Bowl was broadcast in Canada with Canadian commercials on both Canadian and American channels. The CRTC’s determination that simultaneous substitution for the Super Bowl is not in the public interest means that, as of January 1, 2017, Canadians watching the Super Bowl on Canadian stations see Canadian commercials, while those watching it on American stations see American commercials. The appellant had entered into an agreement with the National Football League (“NFL”), granting the appellant an exclusive license to broadcast the Super Bowl in Canada through to February 2020. The appellant recovers the costs of the license by selling to Canadian businesses advertisements can be inserted into the Super Bowl broadcast on both Canadian and American stations. The appellant and the NFL challenged the jurisdiction of the CRTC to issue the Order on the basis that it conflicts with Canadian broadcasting policy and regulations; targets a specific program, applies changes to the regulatory regime retrospectively to the detriment of vested rights, and is contrary to the Copyright Act and Canada’s international trade obligations. The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed those appeals.
- Date modified: