Case information

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings

Date	Proceeding	Filed By (if applicable)
1992-01-09	Appeal closed
1991-12-02	Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties, British Columbia (Vancouver)
1991-12-02	Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Guild, Yule & Co. (Vancouver,BC)
1991-12-02	Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa,ON)
1991-12-02	Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Guild, Yule & Co. (Vancouver,BC)
1991-12-02	Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Guild, Yule & Co. (Vancouver,BC)
1991-12-02	Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa,ON)
1991-11-21	Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa,ON)
1991-11-21	Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Guild, Yule & Company (Vancouver,BC)
1991-11-21	Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ W LaF L'HD So G Co McL St, The appeal is dismissed with costs. Wilson J. took no part in the judgment. Dismissed, with costs
1990-11-05	General proceeding, transcripts received and distributed to the justices (126 pages)
1990-10-29	Hearing of the appeal, 1990-10-29, CJ W LaF L'HD So G Co McL St Decision reserved
1990-10-25	General proceeding, 10 copies of "The Equitable Remedy of Compensation"	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-10-22	Book of authorities, 10 copies of joint	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-10-03	Order on motion for additional time to present oral argument, to one full day
1990-10-03	Order on motion to expedite the appeal
1990-09-27	Appeal hearing scheduled, 1990-10-29 Decision reserved
1990-09-24	Notice of hearing, With service	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-09-18	General proceeding, consent order for late filing of Respondents' factum	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-09-18	Respondent's factum, 21 copies	Boughton & Company
1990-09-17	Appeal perfected for hearing, Session beginning on 1990-10-01
1990-09-17	Decision on motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show Cause, fixing the appeal hearing date to Oct/29/90 Granted, no order as to costs
1990-09-17	Hearing of motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show Cause, 1990-09-17, fixing the appeal hearing date to Oct/29/90
1990-09-17	Hearing of motion to expedite the appeal, 1990-09-17, fixing the appeal hearing date to Oct/29/90
1990-09-17	Submission of motion to expedite the appeal, 1990-09-17, fixing the appeal hearing date to Oct/29/90
1990-09-17	Decision on motion for additional time to present oral argument, to one full day,, CJ Granted, no order as to costs
1990-09-17	Hearing of motion for additional time to present oral argument, 1990-09-17, to one full day,, CJ
1990-09-17	Submission of motion for additional time to present oral argument, 1990-09-17, to one full day,, CJ
1990-09-13	Response to the motion for additional time to present oral argument	Boughton & Company
1990-09-13	Affidavit, of Ed Van Bemmel, with service	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-09-13	Motion for additional time to present oral argument, With service	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-09-13	Response to motion to expedite the appeal, With service	Boughton & Company
1990-09-13	Affidavit, of Edouard Van Bemmel, with service	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-09-13	Motion to expedite the appeal, fixing the date (Oct/29,30,31 or Nov/1,2,6,7,8), with service	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-09-13	Affidavit, of Kenneth Charles MacKenzie, Q.C.	Boughton & Company
1990-09-13	Affidavit, of David Roberts, Q.C.	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-09-13	Motion for additional time to present oral argument, (1 day)	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-09-13	Affidavit, of Kenneth Charles MacKenzie, Q.C.	Boughton & Company
1990-09-13	Affidavit, of David Roberts, Q.C.	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-09-13	Affidavit, of Eduard J. Van Bemmel	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-09-13	Motion to expedite the appeal, (Oct. 29, 30 31 - Nov. 2, 6, 7 and 8 - first two weeks in Dec.)	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-08-13	Appellant's factum, 21 copies, with service	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-05-30	Certified casebook, 1 copy	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-05-30	Case on appeal, 20 copies	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-04-02	Notice of deposit of security, certificate #2125, with service
1990-03-20	Order granting leave to appeal
1990-03-14	$500 security deposit paid, certificate #2125	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-03-14	Notice of appeal, With service	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1990-03-02	Close file on Leave
1990-03-01	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Campney & Murphy (Vancouver,BC)
1990-03-01	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Guild, Yule & Company (Vancouver,BC)
1990-03-01	Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, CJ So McL, The application for leave to appeal is granted, costs in the cause. Granted, with costs in the cause
1990-03-01	Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1990-03-01, CJ So McL
1990-03-01	All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1990-03-01, CJ So McL
1989-12-18	All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ So McL
1989-11-24	General proceeding, 5 copies of the applicant's reply to the respondent's argument	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1989-11-20	Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies	Boughton & Company
1989-11-03	$30.00 filing fee, receipt #15969	Canson Enterprises Ltd.
1989-11-03	Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service, Completed on: 1989-11-03	Canson Enterprises Ltd.

Parties

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants

Name	Role	Status
Canson Enterprises Ltd.	Applicant	Active
Fealty Enterprises Ltd.	Applicant	Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents

Name	Role	Status
Boughton & Company	Respondent	Active
Wollen, Ralph R.	Respondent	Active
Treit, George O.	Respondent	Active
Treit Land Consultants Inc.	Respondent	Active
Pacific Mortgage Corporation Limited	Respondent	Active
Wilkins, Gordon Bert	Respondent	Active
Sun-Mark Development Corporation	Respondent	Active
Peregrine Ventures Inc.	Respondent	Active

Counsel

Summary

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Related links

• Accessibility
• Restrictions

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Related links

• Accessibility
• Restrictions

Webcasts

Not available.

Related links

• Accessibility
• Restrictions