Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


22125

Gerald M. Brissette, et al. v. Westbury Life Insurance Company, formerly known as Pitts Life Insurance Company

(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
1997-09-03 Appeal closed
1997-09-03 Close file on Leave
1993-08-12 Submission of application to a judge for review of a decision of the registrar on an objection to the taxation of a bill of costs, 1993-08-12, So
Decision reserved
1993-08-12 Decision on judicial taxation, So, SOPINKA J.: The respondent applies, pursuant to Rule 62, for review of the Registrar's taxation of its bill of costs of this appeal which was dismissed with costs on a party and party scale. The Registrar refused to increase the amount in respect to tariff B items 7, 13 and 19 notwithstanding that the tariff allows her a discretion to do so. Her refusal was grounded on the premise that it was not shown that this case was relatively more complex than cases to which the tariff was intended to apply. The Standard of review under Rule 62 was expressed as follows in Bhatnager v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1991] 3 S.C.R. 317, at p. 318. Rule 62 authorizes a review of the decision of the Registrar and not an appeal. A judge of this Court should not generally interfere with the decision of the Registrar simply on the basis of a difference of opinion as to the proper amount to be allowed. Rather, there must be an error in principle or the Registrar must be shown to be clearly wrong in the amount allowed. There is no question that from the point of view of indemnity, the tariff items are woefully inadequate. In my view, although this may be a reason for the tariff to be amended, while it remains at its present level it is the expression of legislative policy with respect to the amounts to be allowed as a general rule. The Registrar's discretion is not intended to be used to make up for the inadequacy of the tariff. Rather, the Registrar has a discretion to increase an allowance if it is shown that the circumstances of a given case are such that the tariff, which is generally applicable, is inadequate. There are no such circumstances here. The application is dismissed with costs.
Dismissed, no order as to costs
1993-08-12 Hearing on judicial taxation, 1993-08-12, So
Decision reserved
1993-08-03 General proceeding, response on the application to a judge for review of the taxation Gerald M. Brissette
1993-07-27 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Ministry of the Attorney General, Court House (Windsor, ON) enclosing their record
1993-07-23 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Court of Appeal of Ontario, enclosing their record
1993-06-25 Application to a judge for review of a decision of the registrar on an objection to the taxation of a bill of costs, 1 copy, with service Gerald M. Brissette
1993-06-17 Decision on the objection to the taxation of the bill of costs, Upon Respondent's request for reconsideration of the taxation in the above-mentioned file, I confirm my taxation of June 2, 1993, Reg
Dismissed, no order as to costs
1993-06-17 Hearing of objection to registrar's decision on taxation, 1993-06-17, Upon Respondent's request for reconsideration of the taxation in the above-mentioned file, I confirm my taxation of June 2, 1993, Reg
1993-06-17 Submission of objection to taxation of the bill of costs, 1993-06-17, Upon Respondent's request for reconsideration of the taxation in the above-mentioned file, I confirm my taxation of June 2, 1993, Reg
1993-06-14 Proof of service, of objection and booklet of authorities of the taxation
1993-06-11 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from gowling; re: bill of costs taxed is proper
1993-06-08 Objection to the taxation of the bill of costs Westbury Life Insurance Company, formerly known as Pitts Life Insurance Company
1993-06-02 Decision on the bill of costs, at $3,736.00. For reasons on taxation see file.
1993-04-15 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (original) from Gowling; re: submissions on the ta xation
1993-04-06 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (by fax) from Randall J. Hofley; re: submissions on the taxation
1993-03-26 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Gowling; re: taxation returnable on March 26/93 at 10:00 a.m.
1992-11-10 Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa,ON)
1992-11-10 Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Radnoff, Pearl, Slover, Swedko, Dwoskin (Ottawa, ON)
1992-11-09 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties, Ontario (Toronto)
1992-10-29 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa,ON)
1992-10-29 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Radnoff, Pearl, Slover, Swedko, Dwoskin (Ottawa, ON)
1992-10-29 Judgment on the appeal rendered, LaF L'HD So G Co St Ia, The appeal is dismissed with costs, Gonthier and Cory JJ. dissenting.
Dismissed, with costs
1992-03-11 General proceeding, transcripts received and distributed to the justices (72 pages)
1992-03-02 General proceeding, copies of judgment in Spicer v. New York Life Ins. Co. Westbury Life Insurance Company, formerly known as Pitts Life Insurance Company
1992-02-27 General proceeding, 10 copies of SUPPLEMENTARY CASE BRIEF distributed in Court Westbury Life Insurance Company, formerly known as Pitts Life Insurance Company
1992-02-27 Hearing of the appeal, 1992-02-27, LaF L'HD So G Co St Ia
Decision reserved
1992-02-14 Book of authorities, 10 copies, vols. 1 and 2 Gerald M. Brissette
1992-01-30 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Gowling, Strathy & Henderson; re: list of appeals inscribed for hearing by this Court during the January 1992 session and the agenda for the hearing.
1992-01-28 General proceeding, Notice of appointment of agent, with service Westbury Life Insurance Company, formerly known as Pitts Life Insurance Company
1992-01-23 Appeal hearing scheduled, 1992-02-27
Decision reserved
1991-11-19 Discontinuance of motion to amend, contents of case Westbury Life Insurance Company, formerly known as Pitts Life Insurance Company
1991-10-31 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Fellowes, McNeil; re: motion to amend the content of the case will be made on Dec. 2/91 instead of Nov. 6/91
1991-10-30 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Gowling; re: Mr. Robert Barnes would like to present his argument via satellite from London on Dec. 2\91
1991-10-28 General proceeding, To Note: Mr. McNeil advised M. Larmour that he would proceed by way of motion to adduce new evidence on Dec. 2\91 Westbury Life Insurance Company, formerly known as Pitts Life Insurance Company
1991-10-18 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Gowling; re: dates for next session; avoid March 10 to April 15\92; Mr. Barnes will be out of the country
1991-10-15 Affidavit, the contents of the case; 2 copies; John Sutherland McNeil, with service Westbury Life Insurance Company, formerly known as Pitts Life Insurance Company
1991-10-15 Motion to amend, the contents of the case (2 copies), with service Westbury Life Insurance Company, formerly known as Pitts Life Insurance Company
1991-10-15 Respondent's factum, 21 copies, with service Westbury Life Insurance Company, formerly known as Pitts Life Insurance Company
1991-10-15 Notice of hearing Gerald M. Brissette
1991-09-20 Appeal perfected for hearing, Session beginning on 1992-01-27
1991-09-20 Appellant's factum, 21 copies, with service Gerald M. Brissette
1991-09-03 Trial court record, 1 envelop
1991-08-27 Appeal court record, (1 appeal book; 1 appellant's factum; 1 respondent's factum)
1991-06-07 Appeal court record, 3 copies of appeal book (in accordion file)
1991-06-06 Certified casebook, 1 copy Gerald M. Brissette
1991-05-17 Case on appeal, 21 copies Gerald M. Brissette
1991-02-21 $500 security deposit paid, direction #2185 Gerald M. Brissette
1991-02-20 Notice of appeal, With service Gerald M. Brissette
1991-02-20 Order granting leave to appeal, With service
1991-01-25 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Gignac, Sutts (Windsor,ON)
1991-01-25 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Fellowes, McNeil (Toronto,ON)
1991-01-25 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, G Co St, The application for leave to appeal is granted.
Granted, no order as to costs
1991-01-25 Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1991-01-25, G Co St
1991-01-25 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1991-01-25, G Co St
1990-12-13 Order on motion to extend time, With service
1990-12-05 General proceeding, 5 copies of Applicant's reply, with service Gerald M. Brissette
1990-12-04 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, G Co St
1990-11-27 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file a respondent's memo to Nov/22/90, LaF
Granted, no order as to costs
1990-11-27 Hearing of motion to extend time, 1990-11-27, to serve and file a respondent's memo to Nov/22/90, LaF
1990-11-27 Submission of motion to extend time, 1990-11-27, to serve and file a respondent's memo to Nov/22/90, LaF
1990-11-26 Response to motion to extend time, to file respondent's memo Gerald M. Brissette
1990-11-26 Affidavit, to file respondent's memo, with service Westbury Life Insurance Company, formerly known as Pitts Life Insurance Company
1990-11-26 Motion to extend time, to file respondent's memo, with service Westbury Life Insurance Company, formerly known as Pitts Life Insurance Company
1990-11-22 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service Westbury Life Insurance Company, formerly known as Pitts Life Insurance Company
1990-10-18 Book of authorities, 5 copies, with service Gerald M. Brissette
1990-10-18 $30.00 filing fee, receipt #18283 Gerald M. Brissette
1990-10-18 Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service, Completed on: 1990-10-18 Gerald M. Brissette

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Brissette, Gerald M. Applicant Active
Bezaire, as Executor & Trustee of the Last Will & Testament of Mary Cecile Brissette, deceas, Bernard Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Westbury Life Insurance Company, formerly known as Pitts Life Insurance Company Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Brissette, Gerald M.

Counsel
Robert E. Barnes, Q.C.
Sutts, Strosberg LLP
600 - 251 GOYEAU ST
PO BOX 670
WINDSOR, Ontario
N9A 6V4
Telephone: (519) 258-9333
Agent
Randall J. Hofley
Gowling Lafleur Henderson
2600 - 160 ELGIN ST
PO BOX 466 STN D
OTTAWA, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 233-1781
FAX: (613) 563-9869

Party: Bezaire, as Executor & Trustee of the Last Will & Testament of Mary Cecile Brissette, deceas, Bernard

Counsel
Robert E. Barnes, Q.C.
Sutts, Strosberg LLP
600 - 251 GOYEAU ST
PO BOX 670
WINDSOR, Ontario
N9A 6V4
Telephone: (519) 258-9333
Agent
Brian A. Crane, Q.C.
Gowling Lafleur Henderson
2600 - 160 Elgin St
Box 466 Stn A
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 8S3
Telephone: (613) 232-1781
FAX: (613) 563-9869

Party: Westbury Life Insurance Company, formerly known as Pitts Life Insurance Company

Counsel
John S. McNeil, Q.C.
Fellowes, McNeil
218 - 111 Richmond Street West
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 2G4
Telephone: (416) 368-4511
FAX: (416) 368-4532
Agent
Kenneth Radnoff
Radnoff, Pearl, Slover, Swedko, Dwoskin
100 Gloucester St
4th Floor
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0A4
Telephone: (613) 594-8844
FAX: (613) 594-9092

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

None.

Lower court rulings

June 15, 1989
Supreme Court of Ontario

8493/83

Motion for summary judgment dismissed (See file)

July 11, 1990
Court of Appeal for Ontario

448/89

Appeal allowed (See file)

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-05-13