Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


22301

Regional Municipality of Peel v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right for Ontario

(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
1997-09-08 Appeal closed
1994-07-15 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Court of Appeal for ON (Toronto) enclosing their record
1993-07-23 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Court of Appeal of Ontario, enclosing their record
1993-02-22 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Claude Alain to T.H. Wickett (Toronto, ON) re: reasons for judgment of McL in appeal have been amended.
1992-12-16 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties, Ontario (Toronto)
1992-12-16 Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Burke-Robertson (Ottawa,ON)
1992-12-16 Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt (Ottawa,ON)
1992-11-23 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt (Ottawa,ON)
1992-11-23 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Burke-Robertson (Ottawa,ON)
1992-11-19 Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ LaF So G Co McL Ia, The appeals are dismissed.
Dismissed, no order as to costs
1992-10-21 General proceeding, To Note, memorandum from Claude E. Alain, Re: letter dated October 19, 1992, from Mr. J. Edgar Sexton, Q.C., counsel for the appellant, and the reasons for judgment of the House of Lords in Woolwich Building Society v. Inland Revenue Commissioners, has be
1992-10-20 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, of J. Edgar Sexton along with the judgment in "Woolwich v. Inland" (joint with 21342)
1992-10-20 General proceeding, to note 8 copies of the judgment in "Woolwich Building Society v. Inland Revenue Commissioners (No 2)" (joint with 21342) Regional Municipality of Peel
1992-06-15 General proceeding, transcripts received and distributed to the justices (181 pages) (joint with 21342)
1992-06-02 Hearing of the appeal, 1992-06-02, CJ LaF So G Co McL Ia
Decision reserved
1992-05-29 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (by fax) of Pat Wilson to confirm that Mr. J.E. Sexton, Q.C. and Mr. D. Stratas will be appearing in this appeal and will be arguing for a total of 2 hours (joint with 21342)
1992-05-21 Book of authorities, JOINT 10 copies of vol. I to III (joint with 21342) Regional Municipality of Peel
1992-05-14 Respondent's factum, 24 copies, with service Her Majesty the Queen in Right for Ontario
1992-05-13 Notice of withdrawal, With service Attorney General of British Columbia
1992-05-13 Notice of withdrawal, With service Attorney General of British Columbia
1992-05-05 General proceeding, 24 copies of detailed index for volumes 4-9 of the Case on Appeal (to be inserted in Vol. 1) Her Majesty the Queen in Right for Ontario
1992-05-04 Trial court record, 1 box
1992-04-21 Appeal hearing scheduled, 1992-06-02
Decision reserved
1992-04-16 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Osler, Hoskin; re: agreement about the order of appearance at the hearing (original)
1992-04-14 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (by fax) from Osler, Hoskin; re: agreement as to the order of appearance in the appeal
1992-04-14 Notice of hearing, With service Regional Municipality of Peel
1992-04-10 Appeal court record, (1 box - joint with 21342)
1992-03-10 Appeal perfected for hearing, Session beginning on 1992-04-27
1992-03-10 Appellant's factum, 21 copies Regional Municipality of Peel
1992-01-02 Service, of case on appeal
1992-01-02 Certified casebook, vols. 1 to 10 Regional Municipality of Peel
1992-01-02 Case on appeal, 21 copies of vols. 1 to 10 Regional Municipality of Peel
1991-11-21 Order granting leave to appeal, With service
1991-08-21 Order on motion for leave to intervene, With service
1991-07-25 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, St, Factum is limited to 20 pages, the appellant is entitled to recover disbursements in accordance with the conditions of its consent, length of oral argument & right to oral argument to be decided by a judge of this court by application made after the intervener has filed its factum.
Granted, no order as to costs
1991-07-25 Hearing of motion for leave to intervene, 1991-07-25, St
1991-07-25 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, 1991-07-25, St
1991-07-24 Response to the motion for leave to intervene Her Majesty the Queen in Right for Ontario
1991-07-24 Response to the motion for leave to intervene Regional Municipality of Peel
1991-07-19 General proceeding, 1 copy of F.C.A judgment in Queen in Right of Can. v. Regional Municipality of Peel + 1 copy of C/A of Ontario judgment in Peel v. Queen in Right of Ont. (joint with 21342) Attorney General of British Columbia
1991-07-10 Affidavit, of E. Robert A. Edwards 2 copies, with service Attorney General of British Columbia
1991-07-10 Motion for leave to intervene, 2 copies, with service Attorney General of British Columbia
1991-06-10 Notice of appeal, With service Regional Municipality of Peel
1991-06-10 $500 security deposit paid, direction #2196 Regional Municipality of Peel
1991-05-10 Close file on Leave
1991-05-09 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Soloway, Wright, Houston (Ottawa,ON)
1991-05-09 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt (Ottawa,ON)
1991-05-09 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, CJ So McL, The application for leave to appeal is granted with costs in the cause.
Granted, with costs in the cause
1991-05-09 Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1991-05-09, CJ So McL
1991-05-09 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1991-05-09, CJ So McL
1991-03-11 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ So McL
1991-02-25 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service Her Majesty the Queen in Right for Ontario
1991-02-06 Application for leave to appeal, as formal order of the Court of Apepal filed TO BE SENT WITH 21342, Completed on: 1991-02-06
1991-02-06 General proceeding, 5 copies of formal order fo the Court of Appeal Regional Municipality of Peel
1991-02-06 Book of authorities, 5 copies (joint with 21342) Regional Municipality of Peel
1991-02-04 Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies (formal Order of C.A. not signed), with service, Incomplete Regional Municipality of Peel
1991-02-04 $30.00 filing fee, receipt #19083 Regional Municipality of Peel
1991-02-04 Application for leave to appeal, *ENTERED IN ERROR*, with service, Completed on: 1991-02-04 Regional Municipality of Peel

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Regional Municipality of Peel Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Her Majesty the Queen in Right for Ontario Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Regional Municipality of Peel

Counsel
J. Edgar Sexton, Q.C.
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt
1 First Canadian Place
PO Box 50
Toronto, Ontario
M5X 1B8
Telephone: (416) 362-2111
Agent
David K. Wilson
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt
1500 - 50 O'Connor St
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 235-7234
FAX: (613) 235-2867

Party: Her Majesty the Queen in Right for Ontario

Counsel
Thomas H. Wickett, Q.C.
Elaine Anderson
Attorney General for Ontario
720 BAY ST
TORONTO, Ontario
M5G 2K1
Telephone: (416) 326-2220
Agent
Robert E. Houston., Q.C.
Burke-Robertson
70 Gloucester St
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0A2
Telephone: (613) 566-2058
FAX: (613) 235-4430

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

None.

Lower court rulings

March 4, 1988
Supreme Court of Ontario

713/83

Judgment in favour of Applicant

December 6, 1990
Court of Appeal for Ontario

198/88

Appeal allowed

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-05-13