Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


22351

Her Majesty the Queen v. Keith Gary B.

(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
1997-09-08 Appeal closed
1996-06-06 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Att. Gen. for Ontario, ATT. Kathy First re: 1 video tape returned
1996-04-02 Record returned to the Registrar of the Court of Appeal
1994-07-21 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Court of Appeal for ON (Toronto, ON) enclosing their record
1993-07-12 Close file on Leave
1993-04-19 Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Burke-Robertson (Ottawa, ON)
1993-04-19 Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Shanbaum, Semanyk (Ottawa, ON)
1993-04-15 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties, Ontario (Toronto)
1993-02-26 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, sent to Shanbaum, Semanyk (Ottawa, ON)
1993-02-26 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, sent to Burke-Robertson (Ottawa, ON)
1993-02-25 Judgment on the appeal rendered, R. v. B. (K.G.), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 740, CJ L'HD So G Co McL Ia, The appeal is allowed and a new trial ordered.
Allowed, no order as to costs
1993-02-11 General proceeding, to note 17 copies of RESPONDENT'S SUPPLEMENTARY FACTUM (distributed to justices CJ, L'HD, So, G, McL, I, on February 15, 1993), with service Keith Gary B.
1993-02-11 Affidavit, of Alan Grant 1 original copy as included in the Respondent's supplementary factum Keith Gary B.
1993-01-29 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (original) from Keith E. Wright; re: prepare to withdraw his objection to the filing of a Summary of the questionnaires if given the opportunity to respond to same
1993-01-29 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (original) from Robert E. Houston, Q.C.; re agrees with Mr. Wright's letter dated Jan. 25/93
1993-01-26 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Robert E. Houston, Q.C.; re: agrees with Mr. Wright's letter dated Jan. 25/93
1993-01-25 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Keith E. Wright; re: prepare to withdraw his objection to the filing of a Summary of the questionnaires if given the opportunity to respond to same
1993-01-25 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Keith E. Wright; re: opposes the Summary of the Supplementary Case on Appeal; but consents to supplementary Case on Appeal vols. 1 and 2
1993-01-21 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Keith E. Wright sent to Robert Houston; re: opposes the Summary of the Supplementary Case on Appeal; but consents to the supplementary Case on Appeal vols. 1 and 2 (distributed to Justices CJ, January 20, 93)
1993-01-19 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (by fax) of Robert E. Houston, Q.C. to Shambaum Semanyk re filing of supplementary material (distributed to Justice CJ, January 20, 93)
1993-01-19 General proceeding, APPELLANTS SUPPLEMENTARY CASE ON APPEAL 1 & 2 AND SUMMARY OF APPELLANTS SUPPLEMENTARY CASE ON APPEAL (7 copies) (distributed to Justices CJ, L'HD, Go, So, Co, McL I, on February 16, 1993) Her Majesty the Queen
1993-01-18 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, of Keith E. Wright to Robert E. Houston, Q.C. re filing a Supplementary factum by the Appellant (by fax)
1993-01-11 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Burke-Robertson (Ottawa,ON) Re: confirming that your letter dated January 7, 93 has been received and brought to the court's attention.
1993-01-07 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Robert E. Houston; re: additional material to be filed with the court and the extension of time to do so; copy of Police Videotaping of Criminal Investigation Interviews (distributed to Justice CJ, January 11, 93)
1992-12-01 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Mr. S. Casey Hill (Toronto,ON) Re: Extension of time granted by this Court.
1992-11-30 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (original) from S. Casey Hill; re: extension of time to secure material relating to videotaped interviewing
1992-11-24 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from S. Casey Hill; re: extension of time to secure material relating to videotaped interviewing (by fax) (distributed to CJ, L'HD, So G, Co, McL, I, 92/11/25)
1992-10-19 General proceeding, transcripts received and distributed to the judges (110 pages)
1992-10-08 Hearing of the appeal, 1992-10-08, CJ L'HD So G Co McL Ia
Decision reserved
1992-10-08 General proceeding, 8 copies of the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario given in Court by the respondent, Mr. Keith E.Wright Keith Gary B.
1992-10-06 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Mr. S. Casey Hill (Toronto,ON) from Mrs. Anne Roland, Re: in reply to your letter dated October 2, 1992, I have been instructed by the Court to advise you that your request to present the video tape in question should be made to the Court at the h
1992-10-05 General proceeding, To Note, memorandum from Claude E. Alain Re: Appellant's Notice of Motion to adduce further evidence together with the attached affadavit and documentation distributed to Justices La L'HD So G Co McL I.
1992-10-05 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Shanbaum/Semanyk: Counsel for the respondent Mr. Keith Wright and Mary Misener will take 1 hour for oral argument.
1992-10-05 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, Fax of Mr. Casey Hill, Gereral Counsel Re: Confirming video tape with D. Beaudoin (original filed on Oct. 8/92)
1992-10-02 Affidavit, (of W.J. Blacklock) 10 copies stapled with EXHIBIT "A", with service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-10-02 Motion to adduce new evidence, RETURNABLE OCTOBER 8, 1992 (10 copies), with service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-10-02 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, Via FAX, of S. Casey Hill (Gerneral Cousel) Re: to properly present argumet a view of "Patch Tape" which is relevant to the presentation of the Appellant's oral argument is requested, would appreciate if arrangements could be made to ensure that the techn
1992-09-30 Appeal hearing scheduled, 1992-10-08
Decision reserved
1992-09-24 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Keith E. Wright; re: books of authorities should be kept in the Justices chambers unless he request that a particular volume be brought into the Courtroom
1992-09-24 Certified casebook, vols. 1 to 6, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-09-23 Book of authorities, 10 copies of vol. I & II and vol. IA, IIA and IIIA (AMERICAN AUTHORITIES) filed as a courtesy to the Court Her Majesty the Queen
1992-09-14 Book of authorities, 10 copies of vol. 1 to 5 Keith Gary B.
1992-08-21 Order on motion to extend time, to serve and file the respondent's factum to Aug/13/1992., with service
1992-08-18 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the respondent's factum to Aug/13/1992., Co
Granted, no order as to costs
1992-08-18 Hearing of motion to extend time, 1992-08-18, to serve and file the respondent's factum to Aug/13/1992., Co
1992-08-18 Submission of motion to extend time, 1992-08-18, to serve and file the respondent's factum to Aug/13/1992., Co
1992-08-14 Response to motion to extend time, to file the Respondent's factum to August 13, 1992 Her Majesty the Queen
1992-08-14 Affidavit, to file the Respondent's factum (of Terri H. Semanyk) Her Majesty the Queen
1992-08-14 Motion to extend time, to file the Respondent's factum to Augusst 13, 1992 Keith Gary B.
1992-08-13 Respondent's factum, 24 copies (extension of time requested), with service Keith Gary B.
1992-06-10 Appeal perfected for hearing, Session beginning on 1992-10-05
1992-05-22 General proceeding, the Respondent waives the period of time between late May, 1992 until Oct. 1992, with service Keith Gary B.
1992-05-13 Appeal court record, 1 box containing 1 appeal book (joint with vol. I to IV of the Trial Transcripts)
1992-05-13 Trial court record, 1 box containing vol. I to IV of Trial transcripts (joint with 1 appeal book)
1992-04-15 Appellant's factum, 24 copies, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-04-10 Decision on motion to expedite the appeal, "the motion to nscribe this appeal for the April session is denied, subject to an undertaking in writing by the respondent to waive his 11(b) rights. The Appeal will be inscribed for the 1st week of October 1992., CJ
Dismissed, no order as to costs
1992-04-10 Hearing of motion to expedite the appeal, 1992-04-10, "the motion to nscribe this appeal for the April session is denied, subject to an undertaking in writing by the respondent to waive his 11(b) rights. The Appeal will be inscribed for the 1st week of October 1992., CJ
1992-04-10 Submission of motion to expedite the appeal, 1992-04-10, "the motion to nscribe this appeal for the April session is denied, subject to an undertaking in writing by the respondent to waive his 11(b) rights. The Appeal will be inscribed for the 1st week of October 1992., CJ
1992-04-09 Affidavit Her Majesty the Queen
1992-04-09 Motion to expedite the appeal Her Majesty the Queen
1992-04-08 Decision on motion to file a lengthy factum, of 50 pages in length and to the respondent a factum of 45 pages in length,, St
Granted, no order as to costs
1992-04-08 Hearing of motion to file a lengthy factum, 1992-04-08, of 50 pages in length and to the respondent a factum of 45 pages in length,, St
1992-04-08 Submission of motion to file a lengthy factum, 1992-04-08, of 50 pages in length and to the respondent a factum of 45 pages in length,, St
1992-04-03 Affidavit, of S. Casey Hill, with service Keith Gary B.
1992-04-03 Motion to file a lengthy factum Keith Gary B.
1992-04-02 General proceeding, 2 draft copies of appellant's factum (returned to Soloway), with service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-04-02 Affidavit, of S. Casey Hill (2 copies), with service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-04-02 Motion to file a lengthy factum, namely 64 pages (2 copies), with service Her Majesty the Queen
1992-03-18 Case on appeal, 23 copies of vol. I to VI, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1991-12-19 Close file on Leave
1991-12-13 Order granting leave to appeal, With service
1991-12-11 Notice of appeal, amended, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1991-11-14 Notice of appeal Her Majesty the Queen
1991-11-14 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Soloway, Wright, Houston (Ottawa,ON)
1991-11-14 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Shanbaum, Semanyk (Ottawa,ON)
1991-11-14 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, CJ So McL, The application for leave to appeal is granted.
Granted, no order as to costs
1991-11-14 Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1991-11-14, CJ So McL
1991-11-14 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1991-11-14, CJ So McL
1991-07-12 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service Keith Gary B.
1991-07-09 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ So McL
1991-05-15 Order on motion to extend time, to serve and file the respondents' argument., with service
1991-05-14 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the respondents' memorandum of argument to July/15/91, So
Granted, no order as to costs
1991-05-14 Hearing of motion to extend time, 1991-05-14, to serve and file the respondents' memorandum of argument to July/15/91, So
1991-05-14 Submission of motion to extend time, 1991-05-14, to serve and file the respondents' memorandum of argument to July/15/91, So
1991-05-13 Response to motion to extend time, to serve and file the respondent's memorandum of argument to July 15, 1991 Her Majesty the Queen
1991-05-13 Affidavit, to serve and file the memorandum of argument to July 15, 1991; Keith E. Wright Keith Gary B.
1991-05-13 Motion to extend time, to serve and file the memorandum of argument to July 15, 1991 Keith Gary B.
1991-04-29 Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, (included in motion book - s. 27(5) of Young Offenders Act), with service Her Majesty the Queen
1991-04-29 Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service, Completed on: 1991-04-29 Her Majesty the Queen
1991-03-15 $30.00 filing fee, receipt #19261 Her Majesty the Queen
1991-03-15 Notice of application for leave to appeal Her Majesty the Queen

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Her Majesty the Queen Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
B., Keith Gary Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Her Majesty the Queen

Counsel
S. Casey Hill
Scott C. Hutchison
Attorney General for Ontario
720 BAY ST
TORONTO, Ontario
M5G 2K1
Telephone: (416) 326-2220
Agent
Robert E. Houston., Q.C.
Burke-Robertson
70 Gloucester St
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0A2
Telephone: (613) 566-2058
FAX: (613) 235-4430

Party: B., Keith Gary

Counsel
Keith E. Wright
Mary E. Misener
1601 - 65 QUEEN ST W
TORONTO, Ontario
M5H 2M5
Telephone: (416) 364-1157
Agent
Terri H. Semanyk
Me Guy Bélanger
166, rue Wellington
Hull, Quebec
J8X 2J4
Telephone: (819) 771-7781
FAX: (819) 771-0608

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

None.

Lower court rulings

February 27, 1991
Court of Appeal for Ontario

Not available

Appeal dismissed

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-05-13