Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


22490

Christine Naglik v. Her Majesty the Queen

(Ontario) (Criminal) (As of Right)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
1997-09-09 Appeal closed
1993-09-21 Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Burke-Robertson (Ottawa, ON)
1993-09-21 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties, Ontario (Toronto)
1993-09-13 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Burke-Robertson (Ottawa, ON)
1993-09-09 Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ LaF L'HD So G Co McL Ia Ma, The appeal is allowed, the convictions on both counts are set aside and a new trial is ordered on each of these counts, and the cross-appeal is allowed, L'Heureux-Dubé and Gonthier JJ. dissenting in part. For answers to constitutional questions see file.
Allowed, no order as to costs
1993-04-21 General proceeding, transcript received and distributed to the judges (160 pages)
1993-04-05 Hearing of the appeal, 1993-04-05, CJ LaF L'HD So G Co McL Ia Ma
Decision reserved
1993-04-05 General proceeding, GIVEN IN COURT BY THE APPELLANT, I. KOZIEBROCKI (Michigan Law Review) (JOINT WITH 22636) Christine Naglik
1993-03-29 General proceeding, 24 copies of reply to the factum of the respondent by way of cross-appeal Her Majesty the Queen
1993-03-26 Proof of service, of books of authorities
1993-03-23 Proof of service, of the Authorities vol. I to VI on A.G. Qué.
1993-03-22 Book of authorities, JOINT 10 copies of vol. I to VI (joint with 22636) Her Majesty the Queen
1993-03-02 Appeal hearing scheduled, 1993-04-05
Decision reserved
1993-02-12 General proceeding, transcript received (7 pages)
1993-02-10 Respondent's factum, 24 copies (factum on Appeal and on Cross-Appeal), with service Her Majesty the Queen
1993-02-01 Decision on motion for an order that the appeal be deemed abandoned, "Appeal is to be heard on April 5, 1993.", CJ So Co McL Ia
Granted, no order as to costs
1993-02-01 Hearing of motion for an order that the appeal be deemed abandoned, 1993-02-01, "Appeal is to be heard on April 5, 1993.", CJ So Co McL Ia
1993-02-01 Submission of motion for an order that the appeal be deemed abandonned, 1993-02-01, "Appeal is to be heard on April 5, 1993.", CJ So Co McL Ia
1993-01-20 Proof of service, from Irwin Koziebrocki (Toronto, ON)
1993-01-19 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Mr. Irwin Koziebrocki, Esq., (Toronto,ON) (in conjunction with File # 22636) Re: you are to appear before this Court to show cause on Mon, Feb 01, 93, as to why matter should not be quashed
1993-01-19 Response to motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show Cause Her Majesty the Queen
1993-01-19 Affidavit, Irwin Koziebrocki, with service Christine Naglik
1993-01-19 Motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show cause, With service Christine Naglik
1993-01-19 Response to motion to extend time, to file the appellant's factum to Jan. 11/93 Her Majesty the Queen
1993-01-19 Affidavit, to file the factum to Jan. 11/93; Irwin Koziebrocki, with service Christine Naglik
1993-01-19 Motion to extend time, to file the factum to Jan. 11/93, with service Christine Naglik
1993-01-11 Appellant's factum, 25 copies, with service Christine Naglik
1993-01-07 Show cause requested by the Court
1992-11-30 Appeal perfected for hearing, Session beginning on 1993-01-25
1992-11-06 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the case on appeal to Oct/23/92, Reg
Granted, no order as to costs
1992-11-06 Hearing of motion to extend time, 1992-11-06, to serve and file the case on appeal to Oct/23/92, Reg
1992-11-06 Submission of motion to extend time, 1992-11-06, to serve and file the case on appeal to Oct/23/92, Reg
1992-11-02 Response to motion to extend time, to file the Case on Appeal to October 23, 1992 (joint with 22636) Her Majesty the Queen
1992-11-02 Affidavit, to file the Case on Appeal (of Irwin Koziebrocki) (joint with 22636), with service Christine Naglik
1992-11-02 Motion to extend time, to file the Case on Appeal to October 23, 1992 (joint with 22636), with service Christine Naglik
1992-11-02 Certified casebook, vol. 1 to 4 (joint with 22636) (service admitted on October 23, 1992), with service Christine Naglik
1992-10-23 Case on appeal, 23 copies of vol. 1 to 4 (extension of time needed) (JOINT WITH 22636) Christine Naglik
1992-01-19 Correspondence received from, sent to Mr. Irwin Koziebrocki, Esq (Toronto,ON) Re: Due to error in mail processing, we are required to send a new letter concerning the show cause to heard Feb 01, 93, c.c. Mr. Robert Houston, Q.C. (Burke-Robertson)
1992-01-03 Notice of appeal, With service Christine Naglik
1991-12-30 Order granting leave to appeal, With service
1991-12-20 General proceeding, Transcripts received (20.pgs)
1991-12-04 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, CJ LaF So G Co McL Ia
Granted, no order as to costs
1991-12-04 Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1991-12-04, CJ LaF So G Co McL Ia
1991-11-08 General proceeding, to note proceedings at trial, vols. 1 to 3, Appeal Book, and Order of Crt. of Appeal of Ontario sent up with leave application for adjudication.
1991-11-08 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1991-12-04, CJ So McL, CJ LaF So G Co McL Ia
1991-10-21 Application for leave to appeal, as formal C/A Order filed, Completed on: 1991-10-21
1991-10-21 General proceeding, to note C/A formal Order (5 copies) Christine Naglik
1991-10-15 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service Her Majesty the Queen
1991-10-04 General proceeding, TO BE REFERRED WITH 22636
1991-10-04 Court of Appeal casebooks and transcripts of evidence, (2 copies of vol. I to III of transcripts and 2 copies of the appeal book) JOINT WITH 22636
1991-09-27 Application for leave to appeal, 6 copies (formal C/A order missing), with service, Incomplete Christine Naglik
1991-06-06 Service, of Notice of Appeal
1991-06-06 $30.00 filing fee, receipt #22716 Christine Naglik
1991-06-06 Notice of appeal, With service Christine Naglik

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Naglik, Christine Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Her Majesty the Queen Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Naglik, Christine

Counsel
Irwin Koziebrocki
1007 - 111 Richmond Street West
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 2G4
Telephone: (416) 364-7292
FAX: (416) 364-7473
Agent
Robert E. Houston., Q.C.
Burke-Robertson
70 Gloucester St
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0A2
Telephone: (613) 566-2058
FAX: (613) 235-4430

Party: Her Majesty the Queen

Counsel
David B. Butt
Attorney General for Ontario
720 BAY ST
10TH FL
TORONTO, Ontario
M5G 2K1
Telephone: (416) 326-4582
FAX: (416) 326-4656
Agent
Robert E. Houston., Q.C.
Burke-Robertson
70 Gloucester St
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0A2
Telephone: (613) 566-2058
FAX: (613) 235-4430

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

None.

Lower court rulings

June 22, 1989
District Court of Ontario

Not available

Conviction: Aggravated assault and failure to provide the necessaries of life

May 27, 1991
Court of Appeal for Ontario

750/89

Appeal against conviction allowed (see file)

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-05-13