Case information

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings

Date	Proceeding	Filed By (if applicable)
1997-09-09	Appeal closed
1994-03-22	Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Court of Appeal of Manitoba enclosing their record
1993-12-06	Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties, Manitoba (Winnipeg)
1993-12-06	Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Burke-Robertson (Ottawa, ON)
1993-12-06	Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON)
1993-12-06	Copy of formal judgment being prepared, A.G. of Canada (Ottawa, ON)
1993-12-06	Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Noël, Berthiaume, Aubry & Ass. (Hull, QC)
1993-11-18	Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ LaF L'HD So G Co McL Ia Ma, The appeal is allowed, the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Manitoba is set aside and the conviction is reinstated. (For answers to Constitutional Questions, see file). Allowed, no order as to costs
1993-11-18	Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Noël, Berthiaume, Aubry & Ass. (Hull, QC)
1993-11-18	Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Attorney General of Canada (Ottawa, ON)
1993-11-18	Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON)
1993-11-18	Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Burke-Robertson (Ottawa, ON)
1993-07-30	General proceeding, transcripts received and distributed to the justices (131 pages)
1993-07-27	Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Attorney General of Canada (Ottawa, ON) (PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS)
1993-07-27	Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Noël, Berthiaume, Aubry & Associés (Hull, QC) (PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS)
1993-07-27	Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON) (PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS)
1993-07-27	Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Burke-Robertson (OTTAWA, ON) (PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS)
1993-07-27	Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Court of Appeal of Manitoba (Winnipeg, MN) (PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS ONLY)
1993-07-14	Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, of Scott C. Hutchison to Chief Justice along with 3 C/A of Ontario judgments respecting the constitutionality of section 715.1 (THESE DOCUMENTS WERE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE JUSTICES AND WERE NOT FILED WITH THE CLERK OF PROCESS)
1993-06-17	Order on motion to extend time, to serve and file their factum to June 7, 1993 nunc pro tunc., with service
1993-06-16	Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file their factum to June 7, 1993., Reg Granted, no order as to costs
1993-06-16	Hearing of motion to extend time, 1993-06-16, to serve and file their factum to June 7, 1993., Reg
1993-06-16	Submission of motion to extend time, 1993-06-16, to serve and file their factum to June 7, 1993., Reg
1993-06-15	Hearing of the appeal, 1993-06-15, We reserve our decision as regards the non- constitutional grounds raised by respondent. We are ready to answer the constitutional questions 1, 2, 3 and 4 now with reasons to follow, CJ LaF L'HD So G Co McL Ia Ma Decision reserved
1993-06-15	Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file their factum to June 7, 1993., Reg Granted, no order as to costs
1993-06-15	Hearing of motion to extend time, 1993-06-15, to serve and file their factum to June 7, 1993., Reg
1993-06-15	Submission of motion to extend time, 1993-06-15, to serve and file their factum to June 7, 1993., Reg
1993-06-14	Book of authorities, 10 copies of vol. 1 to 4, with service	Attorney General for Ontario
1993-06-11	Affidavit, of John Thomson Irvine., with service	Attorney General of Saskatchewan
1993-06-11	Motion to extend time, to serve and file their factum to June 7, 1993, with service	Attorney General of Saskatchewan
1993-06-11	General proceeding, to note 10 copies of ERRATA in the Joint Book of Authorities	Her Majesty the Queen
1993-06-08	Response to motion to extend time, to serve and file their factum (all parties), with service	Her Majesty the Queen
1993-06-08	Affidavit, of Scott C. Hutchison., with service	Attorney General for Ontario
1993-06-08	Motion to extend time, to serve and file the interveners factum to June 7 1993., with service	Attorney General for Ontario
1993-06-07	Intervener's factum, 24 copies (extension of time requested - Karen advised), with service	Attorney General for Ontario
1993-06-07	Intervener's factum, 23 copies (extension of time requested)	Attorney General of Saskatchewan
1993-06-02	Book of authorities, 10 copies of vol. 1 to 9	Her Majesty the Queen
1993-05-30	Order on miscellaneous motion, to permit the filing of their amended factum., with service
1993-05-20	Intervener's factum, AMENDED 24 copies, with service	Attorney General of Canada
1993-05-17	Decision on miscellaneous motion, permiting the filing of an amended factum,, G Granted, no order as to costs
1993-05-17	Hearing of miscellaneous motion, 1993-05-17, permiting the filing of an amended factum,, G
1993-05-17	Submission of miscellaneous motion, 1993-05-17, permiting the filing of an amended factum,, G
1993-05-07	Proof of service, 1 copy of factum, with service
1993-05-06	Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Henry S. Brown; re: A.G. Alberta (Jack Watson) will not attend at the hearing of the appeal; request that the reasons for judgment say: submission presented in writing and not did not attend
1993-05-06	Intervener's factum, 23 copies (extension of time requested - EVB)	Attorney General of New Brunswick
1993-04-29	Response to miscellaneous motion, for an Order permitting the filing of an amended factum by the intervener Attorney General of Canada	Her Majesty the Queen
1993-04-29	Affidavit, for an Order permitting the filing of an amended factum; Kimberly Prost, with service	Attorney General of Canada
1993-04-29	Notice of miscellaneous motion, for an Order permitting the filing of an amended factum, with service	Attorney General of Canada
1993-04-23	Appeal hearing scheduled, 1993-06-15 Decision reserved
1993-04-13	Reply factum on appeal, 24 copies, with service	Her Majesty the Queen
1993-04-08	Order on motion to file a reply factum on appeal, With service
1993-04-02	Decision on the motion to file a reply factum on appeal, and also the respondent is allowed an additional 10 minutes to present oral argument., Reg Granted, no order as to costs
1993-04-02	Hearing of motion to file a reply factum on appeal, 1993-04-02, and also the respondent is allowed an additional 10 minutes to present oral argument., Reg
1993-04-02	Submission of motion to file a reply factum on appeal, 1993-04-02, and also the respondent is allowed an additional 10 minutes to present oral argument., Reg
1993-03-30	Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Gene G. Zazelenchuk; re: does not oppose the motion of the appellant to file a reply factum providing that the respondent receives an extra 10 or 15 minues argument time to reply to the issues raised in the reply factum
1993-03-30	Notice of hearing, With service	Her Majesty the Queen
1993-03-19	Affidavit, Deborah Louise Carlson, with service	Her Majesty the Queen
1993-03-19	Motion to file a reply factum on appeal, With service	Her Majesty the Queen
1993-02-16	Order on motion to order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show cause, With service
1993-02-12	Decision on motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show Cause, given consent on the condition that the appeal be heard in the spring term., CJ Granted, no order as to costs
1993-02-12	Hearing of motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show Cause, 1993-02-12, given consent on the condition that the appeal be heard in the spring term., CJ
1993-02-12	Submission of motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show Cause, 1993-02-12, given consent on the condition that the appeal be heard in the spring term., CJ
1993-02-11	Response to motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show Cause	D.O.L.
1993-02-11	Affidavit, Deborah Louise Carlson, with service	Her Majesty the Queen
1993-02-11	Motion for an order that the appeal not be deemed abandoned [s. 695(2) Criminal Code] / Show cause, With service	Her Majesty the Queen
1993-02-11	Order on miscellaneous motion, to appoint counsel., with service
1993-01-28	Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file A.G. Canada's factum to January 20, 1993., L'HD Granted, no order as to costs
1993-01-28	Hearing of motion to extend time, 1993-01-28, to serve and file A.G. Canada's factum to January 20, 1993., L'HD
1993-01-28	Submission of motion to extend time, 1993-01-28, to serve and file A.G. Canada's factum to January 20, 1993., L'HD
1993-01-28	Order on motion to extend time, to serve and file their factum., with service
1993-01-27	Response to motion to extend time, to file the A.G. Canada's factum to Jan. 20/93	D.O.L.
1993-01-27	Response to motion to extend time, to file the A.G. Canada's factum to Jan. 20/93	Her Majesty the Queen
1993-01-27	Affidavit, to file the factum to Jan. 20/93; Kimberly Prost, with service	Attorney General of Canada
1993-01-27	Motion to extend time, to file the factum to Jan. 20/93, with service	Attorney General of Canada
1993-01-27	Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file their factum to Jan\18\1993 nunc pro tunc., L'HD Granted, no order as to costs
1993-01-27	Hearing of motion to extend time, 1993-01-27, to serve and file their factum to Jan\18\1993 nunc pro tunc., L'HD
1993-01-27	Submission of motion to extend time, 1993-01-27, to serve and file their factum to Jan\18\1993 nunc pro tunc., L'HD
1993-01-26	Response to motion to extend time, to serve and file the A.G. Alberta's factum to Jan. 18/93	D.O.L.
1993-01-26	Response to motion to extend time, to serve and file the A.G. Alberta's factum to Jan. 18/93	Her Majesty the Queen
1993-01-26	Affidavit, to serve and file the factum to Jan. 18/93; Jack Watson	Attorney General of Alberta
1993-01-26	Motion to extend time, to serve and file the factum to Jan. 18/93	Attorney General of Alberta
1993-01-20	Response to motion to extend time, from the respondent Gowling (by fax)	D.O.L.
1993-01-20	Response to motion to extend time, from the appellant Gowling (by fax)	Her Majesty the Queen
1993-01-20	Order on motion to extend time, to serve and file their factum to Jan\15\93, with service
1993-01-20	Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file their factum to Jan/15/1993, Reg Granted, no order as to costs
1993-01-20	Hearing of motion to extend time, 1993-01-20, to serve and file their factum to Jan/15/1993, Reg
1993-01-20	Submission of motion to extend time, 1993-01-20, to serve and file their factum to Jan/15/1993, Reg
1993-01-20	Intervener's factum, 24 copies (extension of time requested) (REFER TO AMENDED FACTUM FILED MAY 20, 1993), with service	Attorney General of Canada
1993-01-19	Proof of service, 1 copyh of factum, with service
1993-01-18	Intervener's factum, 23 copies (extension of time requested)	Attorney General of Alberta
1993-01-18	Proof of service, of intervener's factum admitted on Jan. 15, 1993
1993-01-18	Proof of service, of the motion to extend time to file the intervener factum
1993-01-15	Affidavit, to serve and file the factum to Jan. 15/93; Lucie Rondeau	Attorney General of Quebec
1993-01-15	Motion to extend time, to file the factum to Jan. 15/93	Attorney General of Quebec
1993-01-15	Intervener's factum, 24 copies (extension of time requested)	Attorney General of Quebec
1993-01-08	Notice of withdrawal, With service	Attorney General of British Columbia
1992-12-16	Respondent's factum, 24 copies, with service	D.O.L.
1992-12-15	Appeal perfected for hearing, Session beginning on 1993-04-26
1992-12-08	Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file a notice of intervention to Dec/04/1992., Ia Granted, no order as to costs
1992-12-08	Hearing of motion to extend time, 1992-12-08, to serve and file a notice of intervention to Dec/04/1992., Ia
1992-12-08	Submission of motion to extend time, 1992-12-08, to serve and file a notice of intervention to Dec/04/1992., Ia
1992-12-07	Response to motion to extend time, to serve and file the notice of intervention of A.G. Ontario	D.O.L.
1992-12-07	Response to motion to extend time, to serve and file the notice of intervention of A.G. Ontario	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-12-04	Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question, With service	Attorney General for Ontario
1992-12-04	Affidavit, to serve and file the notice of intervention; Karen L. Collins, with service	Attorney General for Ontario
1992-12-04	Motion to extend time, to serve and file a notice of intervention, with service	Attorney General for Ontario
1992-11-18	General proceeding, consent to user the same agent (Gowling)	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-11-05	Proof of service, 1 copy of notice of intention to intervene, with service
1992-11-05	Order on motion to extend time, to serve and file the appellant's factum.
1992-10-29	Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the appellant's factum to Oct/20/1992, Co Granted, no order as to costs
1992-10-29	Hearing of motion to extend time, 1992-10-29, to serve and file the appellant's factum to Oct/20/1992, Co
1992-10-29	Submission of motion to extend time, 1992-10-29, to serve and file the appellant's factum to Oct/20/1992, Co
1992-10-23	Response to motion to extend time, to file the appellant's factum to Oct. 20/92	D.O.L.
1992-10-23	Affidavit, to file the factum to Oct. 20/92; Eduard J. Van Bemmel	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-10-23	Motion to extend time, to file the factum to Oct. 20/92	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-10-20	General proceeding, consent to use the same agent (Gowling) for both sides	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-10-20	Appellant's factum, 24 copies, with service	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-10-19	Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question, With service	Attorney General of British Columbia
1992-10-19	Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question, With service	Attorney General of Saskatchewan
1992-10-19	Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question, With service	Attorney General of New Brunswick
1992-10-16	General proceeding, Notice of change of Ottawa Agent from McCarthy Tétrault to Gowling, Strathy & Henderson, with service	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-10-16	Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question, With service	Attorney General of Alberta
1992-10-16	Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question	Attorney General of Quebec
1992-10-15	Notice of intervention respecting a constitutional question, With service	Attorney General of Canada
1992-10-02	Notice of constitutional question(s), With service	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-09-29	Order on motion to state a constitutional question, With service
1992-09-24	Order on motion to extend time, to serve and file the case on appeal book., with service
1992-09-16	Decision on the motion to state a constitutional question, " For Constitutional Questions see file or Reg's red book #8 @ p.395. Interventions on behalf of the Attorneys General no later than Oct/19/1992, CJ Granted, no order as to costs
1992-09-16	Hearing of the motion to state a constitutional question, 1992-09-16, " For Constitutional Questions see file or Reg's red book #8 @ p.395. Interventions on behalf of the Attorneys General no later than Oct/19/1992, CJ
1992-09-16	Submission of motion to state a constitutional question, 1992-09-16, " For Constitutional Questions see file or Reg's red book #8 @ p.395. Interventions on behalf of the Attorneys General no later than Oct/19/1992, CJ
1992-09-15	Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the case on appeal to Aug/20/92, Reg Granted, no order as to costs
1992-09-15	Hearing of motion to extend time, 1992-09-15, to serve and file the case on appeal to Aug/20/92, Reg
1992-09-15	Submission of motion to extend time, 1992-09-15, to serve and file the case on appeal to Aug/20/92, Reg
1992-09-14	Response to the motion to state a constitutional question, filed on April 30/92	D.O.L.
1992-09-14	Response to motion to extend time, to serve and file the Case on Appeal to Aug. 20/92	D.O.L.
1992-09-14	Motion to extend time, to serve and file the Case on Appeal to Aug. 20/92	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-09-10	Trial court record, 1 accordion file
1992-09-04	Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Court of Appeal of Manitoba (Winnipeg,MN) re: acknowledge receipt of letter dated August 28, 1992 and the enclosed material.
1992-09-04	Appeal court record, (accordeon)
1992-09-04	Certified casebook, 1 copy of vols. 1 to 4	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-08-26	Certified casebook, vol. I to IV (SERVICE ADMITTED ON AUGUST 20, 1992 and extension of time requested as per order of I dated 1992/07/17), with service	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-08-24	Agreement as to contents of case	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-08-14	Case on appeal, 23 copies of vol. 1 to 4	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-08-11	Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Legal Aid Manitoba (Allan Fineblit);re: Mr. Gene Zazelenchuk is the counsel appointed to represent the respondent
1992-07-17	Order on motion to extend time, to serve and file the case on appeal to Aug\17\92 and to serve and file the appellant's factum to Oct\16\92., with service
1992-07-16	Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the case on appeal to Aug\17\92 and to serve and file the appellant's factum to Oct\16\92., Ia Granted, no order as to costs
1992-07-16	Hearing of motion to extend time, 1992-07-16, to serve and file the case on appeal to Aug\17\92 and to serve and file the appellant's factum to Oct\16\92., Ia
1992-07-16	Submission of motion to extend time, 1992-07-16, to serve and file the case on appeal to Aug\17\92 and to serve and file the appellant's factum to Oct\16\92., Ia
1992-07-15	Affidavit, (original) to serve and file the Case on Appeal & the factum (of Deborah Louise Carlson), with service	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-07-13	Affidavit, (by fax) to serve and file the Case on Appeal and the factum (of Deborah Louise Carlson)	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-07-09	Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Marva Smith; re: motion to extend time to serve and file the Case on Appeal and the factum; will notify the Court of the name of counsel later this week
1992-07-09	Response to motion to extend time, to serve and file the Case on Appeal to August 17/92 and to serve and file the appellant's factum to Octobver 16/92	D.O.L.
1992-07-09	Motion to extend time, to serve and file the Case on Appeal and the factum, with service	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-06-17	Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (by fax) of Marva J. Smith to advise of an error in appendix 2 of the motion brief along with the replacement
1992-06-17	Decision on miscellaneous motion, for the appointment of counsel. For further details see file or Reg's Red Book #8 @p.352, McL Granted, no order as to costs
1992-06-17	Hearing of miscellaneous motion, 1992-06-17, for the appointment of counsel. For further details see file or Reg's Red Book #8 @p.352, McL
1992-06-17	Submission of miscellaneous motion, 1992-06-17, for the appointment of counsel. For further details see file or Reg's Red Book #8 @p.352, McL
1992-06-16	Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, (by fax) of Marva J. Smith advising that she will appear for the satellite motion with a representat ive of Legal Aid Mr. A. Fineblit
1992-05-27	Order on motion to extend time, to serve and file the case on appeal
1992-05-27	Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Colin Baster; re: A.G. Manitoba requests a hearing of the motion to appoint counsel via satellite
1992-05-26	Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Gowling; re: Rocky Kravetsky will argue the motion for appointment of counsel via satellite
1992-05-26	Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the case on appeal to July 15, 1992 and for an order that the said case on appeal shall include transcrirts of 3 videotapes which were admitted into evidence at trial., Reg Granted, no order as to costs
1992-05-26	Hearing of motion to extend time, 1992-05-26, to serve and file the case on appeal to July 15, 1992 and for an order that the said case on appeal shall include transcrirts of 3 videotapes which were admitted into evidence at trial., Reg
1992-05-26	Submission of motion to extend time, 1992-05-26, to serve and file the case on appeal to July 15, 1992 and for an order that the said case on appeal shall include transcrirts of 3 videotapes which were admitted into evidence at trial., Reg
1992-05-22	General proceeding, to note Casebook of the Attorney General RE: Appointment of Counsel (2 copies), with service	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-05-22	General proceeding, to note Motion Brief of the Attorney General RE: Appointment of Counsel (2 copies), with service	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-05-22	Affidavit, for appointing of counsel (SUPPLEMENTATY of Alan Percy Fineblit) 2 copies, with service	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-05-21	Response to motion to extend time, to file and serve the Case on appeal to July 15, 1992	D.O.L.
1992-05-13	Affidavit, for an order appointing counsel (of Gene Gregory Zazelenchuk), with service	D.O.L.
1992-05-12	Affidavit, for an order appointing counsel (of Allan Percy Fineblit), with service	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-05-12	Affidavit, to file and serve the Case on Appeal (of Deborah Louise Carlson), with service	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-05-12	Motion to extend time, to file and serve the Case on Appeal; 2 copies, with service	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-05-12	Affidavit, (of Deborah Louise Carlson) for an order appointing counsel, with service	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-05-11	Order granting leave to appeal, With service
1992-05-08	Notice of change of counsel, to appoint Gene Gregory Zazelenchuk and Rocky Kravetsky as sollicitors (formerly represented by Michael J. Manko and Robert L. pollack), with service	D.O.L.
1992-05-08	Affidavit, (of D.O.L.) for an order appointing counsel, with service	D.O.L.
1992-05-08	Notice of miscellaneous motion, for an order appointing counsel, with service	D.O.L.
1992-04-30	Motion to state a constitutional question, With service	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-03-04	Notice of appeal, With service	Her Majesty the Queen
1992-02-07	Close file on Leave
1992-02-06	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, McCarthy, Tétrault (Ottawa,ON)
1992-02-06	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Zazelenchuk, Manko, Trusewych (Wpg,MN)
1992-02-06	Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, CJ So McL, The application for leave to appeal is granted. Granted, no order as to costs
1992-02-06	Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1992-02-06, CJ So McL
1992-02-06	All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1992-02-06, CJ So McL
1991-11-25	General proceeding, to note letter from McCarthy, Tétrault dated Oct. 25, 1991 (signed by M. Renaud) sent up along with leave material for adjudication.
1991-11-25	All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ So McL
1991-11-18	Order on motion to extend time, to serve and file the respondent's response to Nov\19\1991
1991-11-13	Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the respondent's argument to Nov\19\1991, LaF Granted, no order as to costs
1991-11-13	Hearing of motion to extend time, 1991-11-13, to serve and file the respondent's argument to Nov\19\1991, LaF
1991-11-13	Submission of motion to extend time, 1991-11-13, to serve and file the respondent's argument to Nov\19\1991, LaF
1991-11-07	Response to motion to extend time, to serve and file the respondent's response to Nov. 19/91	Her Majesty the Queen
1991-11-07	Affidavit, to serve and file the response to Nov. 19/91; Michael John Manko, with service	D.O.L.
1991-11-07	Motion to extend time, to serve and file the response to Nov. 19/91, with service	D.O.L.
1991-10-25	Application for leave to appeal, as no order of Queen's Bench exists, Completed on: 1991-10-25
1991-10-25	Correspondence received from, from McCarthy, Tétrault; re: no formal orders issued from the Queen's Bench	Her Majesty the Queen
1991-10-22	Correspondence received from, sent to McCarthy, Tétreault (Ottawa,ON) acknowledging receipt of application for leave. Regret to advise that material does not comply with the Court's requirements as formal order of trial Court missing. Application will not be referred until applicatio
1991-10-18	$30.00 filing fee, receipt #23420	Her Majesty the Queen
1991-10-18	Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies (missing formal order of T.C.), with service, Incomplete	Her Majesty the Queen

Parties

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants

Name	Role	Status
Her Majesty the Queen	Applicant	Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents

Name	Role	Status
D.O.L.	Respondent	Active

Other parties

Other parties

Name	Role	Status
Attorney General of Canada	Intervener	Active
Attorney General of Quebec	Intervener	Active
Attorney General of Alberta	Intervener	Active
Attorney General of New Brunswick	Intervener	Active
Attorney General of Saskatchewan	Intervener	Active
Attorney General for Ontario	Intervener	Active

Counsel

Summary

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Related links

• Accessibility
• Restrictions

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Related links

• Accessibility
• Restrictions

Webcasts

Not available.

Related links

• Accessibility
• Restrictions