Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
24815
Craig William Ryback v. Zena Mae Ryback
(British Columbia) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 1996-04-16 | Close file on Leave | |
| 1996-04-04 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Zena Mae Thierstein (Langley, BC) | |
| 1996-04-04 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Craig W. Ryback (Surry, BC) | |
| 1996-04-03 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, British Columbia (Vancouver) | |
| 1996-03-21 | Correspondence received from, sent to Zena Mae Ryback (Langley, BC) enclosing copy of the Order of Co J. dismissing the motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal and also a copy of the Order of the Registrar dismissing the application for le | |
| 1996-03-21 | Letter and Order pursuant to Rule 64 sent to | |
| 1996-03-21 | Correspondence received from, sent to Craig William Ryback (Surrey, BC) also by Fax, a copy of the Order of Co J. dismissing the motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal also a copy of the Order of the Registrar dismissing the application f | |
| 1996-03-05 |
Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application, - The application for an extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal is dismissed. This decision is based not only on the lapse of time but also on the lack of merit in the application for leave, Co Dismissed, no order as to costs |
|
| 1996-03-05 | Hearing of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, 1996-03-05, - The application for an extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal is dismissed. This decision is based not only on the lapse of time but also on the lack of merit in the application for leave, Co | |
| 1996-03-05 | Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, 1996-03-05, - The application for an extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal is dismissed. This decision is based not only on the lapse of time but also on the lack of merit in the application for leave, Co | |
| 1996-03-04 | Correspondence received from, (by fax) from respondent; re: she is not represented by counsel | Zena Mae Ryback |
| 1996-03-04 | Proof of service, of affidavit of John B. Hira | |
| 1996-02-22 | $50.00 filing fee, receipt #31618 | Craig William Ryback |
| 1996-02-22 | $50.00 filing fee for a notice of motion, receipt #31618 | Craig William Ryback |
| 1996-02-21 | Affidavit, of John B. Hira in opposition to the extension of time and the leave application (original filed Feb. 27/96) | Zena Mae Ryback |
| 1996-02-19 | Proof of service, of leave application and notice and affidavit to extend time | |
| 1996-02-19 | Affidavit, 5 copies; Craig Wm. Ryback | Craig William Ryback |
| 1996-02-19 | Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, Completed on: 1996-02-19 | Craig William Ryback |
| 1996-02-19 | General proceeding, 4 additional copies of leave application (not signed) | Craig William Ryback |
| 1996-02-03 | Proof of service, from Craig W. Ryback re: Rule 25 letter dated Jan 29/96 | |
| 1996-01-29 | Correspondence received from, sent to Zena Mae Ryback (Langley, BC) (DOUBLE REGISTERED) enclosing a Notice from the Registrar pursuant to Rule 25 | |
| 1996-01-29 | Correspondence received from, sent to Craig Willliam Ryback (Surrey, BC) (DOUBLE REGISTERED) enclosing a notice pursuant to Rule 25 from the Registrar | |
| 1995-07-18 | Correspondence received from, from D. Beaulieu to C. W. Ryback, c.c. to Zena Ryback re: application for leave to appeal is imcomplete | |
| 1995-06-30 | Application for leave to appeal, 4 copies (proof of service, filing fee missing and signature of counsel in Part 4 of the memorandum requested and 1 more copy of leave book requested), Incomplete | Craig William Ryback |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Ryback, Craig William | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Ryback, Zena Mae | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Ryback, Craig William
Counsel
SURREY, British Columbia
V4N 3G6
Telephone: (604) 576-2242
FAX: (604) 888-5694
Party: Ryback, Zena Mae
Counsel
LANGLEY, British Columbia
V3A 4P5
Telephone: (604) 534-6374
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
None.
Lower court rulings
Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver)
CA017499
appeal dismissed
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available