Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
24981
Peter Haberman v. Mauricio Peixeiro, et al.
(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 1997-05-09 | Appeal closed | |
| 1997-05-01 | Record returned to the Registrar of the Court of Appeal, (1 env.) | |
| 1997-04-23 | Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties, Ontario (Toronto) | |
| 1997-04-23 | Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Nelligan, Power (Ottawa, ON) | |
| 1997-04-23 | Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Lang, Michener (Ottawa, ON) | |
| 1997-03-26 | General proceeding, transcript received and distributed to the justices (35 pages) | |
| 1997-03-13 |
Judgment on the appeal rendered, L'HD So G Co McL Ia Ma Dismissed, with costs |
|
| 1997-03-13 | Hearing of the appeal, 1997-03-13, L'HD So G Co McL Ia Ma | |
| 1997-03-13 | General proceeding, 9 copies of BOOK OF EXCERPTS | Mauricio Peixeiro |
| 1997-03-11 | Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Lang, Michener (fax copy) re: name of counsel appearing at the hearing of the appeal | |
| 1997-03-11 | Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from T. Rachlin, letter dated March 10, 1997 re: enclosing page 243 of the book of authorities at tab 5 (attached) | |
| 1997-02-27 | Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from Rachlin & Wolfson to Registrar, letter dated Feb. 27, 1997 (fax copy) re: names of counsel appearing at the hearing of the appeal (original received on March 3, 1997) | |
| 1997-02-19 | Reply factum on appeal, 24 copies (see order dated Feb. 10, 1996), with service, Completed on: 1997-02-19 | Peter Haberman |
| 1997-02-19 | Supplemental document, 10 copies of APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTARY BOOK OF AUTHORITIES, with service | Peter Haberman |
| 1997-02-10 |
Decision on motion to extend time, (reply factum referred to in the motion to strike to be filed no later than Feb. 20/97), So Granted, no order as to costs |
|
| 1997-02-10 | Hearing of motion to extend time, 1997-02-10, (reply factum referred to in the motion to strike to be filed no later than Feb. 20/97), So | |
| 1997-02-10 | Submission of motion to extend time, 1997-02-10, (reply factum referred to in the motion to strike to be filed no later than Feb. 20/97), So | |
| 1997-02-10 | Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from D. Brown of Nelligan & Power, letter dated Feb. 10, 1997 (fax copy) re: did not receive Justice Sopinka's order until Feb. 10, 1997; would like to know if he can file the reply 10 days of Feb. 10) | |
| 1997-02-06 | Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, from A. Malek re: will not file a reply to the respondent's response on motion to strike (fax copy) | |
| 1997-02-06 |
Decision on motion to strike out, So, praragraphs in the respondent's factum. The respondent can support the result in the Court of Appeal on a ground other than that upon which the judgement is based. No cross-appeal is required unless the respondent seeks to vary the disposition in the formal judgement. The appellant may file a reply factum limited to 5 pages relating to the issue raised in paragraphs 76 to 87 of the respondents factum. The reply factum to be filed within 7 days of this order. No further written reply is necessary. Dismissed, no order as to costs |
|
| 1997-02-06 | Hearing of motion to strike out, 1997-02-06, So | |
| 1997-02-06 | Submission of motion to strike out, 1997-02-06, So | |
| 1997-02-04 | General proceeding, 5 copies of response to the motion to strike, with service | Mauricio Peixeiro |
| 1997-01-28 | Affidavit, (Alan Rachlin), with service | Peter Haberman |
| 1997-01-28 | $50.00 filing fee for notice of motion, receipt #33432 | Peter Haberman |
| 1997-01-28 | Motion to strike out, para 14 and 76 to 87 of the respondent's factum or in the alternative, permitting the appellant to file a factum in reply, with service, Completed on: 1997-01-28 | Peter Haberman |
| 1997-01-27 | Appeal hearing scheduled, 1997-03-13 | |
| 1996-12-24 | Book of authorities, 10 copies, with service, Completed on: 1996-12-24 | Mauricio Peixeiro |
| 1996-12-19 | Respondent's factum, 24 copies, with service, Completed on: 1996-12-19 | Mauricio Peixeiro |
| 1996-12-16 | Appeal perfected for hearing, Session beginning on 1997-01-20 | |
| 1996-10-21 | Book of authorities, 10 copies, with service, Completed on: 1996-10-21 | Peter Haberman |
| 1996-10-21 | Appellant's factum, 24 copies, with service, Completed on: 1996-10-21 | Peter Haberman |
| 1996-09-17 | Certified casebook, (service admitted on Sept. 13/96), with service | Peter Haberman |
| 1996-09-17 | Case on appeal, 23 copies | Peter Haberman |
| 1996-07-09 | Appeal court record, (1 env.) | |
| 1996-06-26 | Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Faust, Azevedo & Wise (Toronto, ON) copy of Rule 32 c.c. Lang, Michener | |
| 1996-06-26 | Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, sent to Rachlin & Wolfson (Toronto, ON) copy of Rule 32 c.c. Nelligan, Power | |
| 1996-06-24 | Order granting leave to appeal | |
| 1996-06-21 | Notice of deposit of security | |
| 1996-06-20 | $500 security deposit paid, direction #2383 | Peter Haberman |
| 1996-06-20 | Notice of appeal, With service, Completed on: 1996-06-20 | Peter Haberman |
| 1996-05-31 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Nelligan, Power | |
| 1996-05-31 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Lang, Michener | |
| 1996-05-30 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, L'HD So McL, The application for leave to appeal is granted. Granted, no order as to costs |
|
| 1996-03-15 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, L'HD So McL | |
| 1995-12-08 | Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, 5 copies, with service | Peter Haberman |
| 1995-12-01 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service | Mauricio Peixeiro |
| 1995-11-14 | Correspondence received from, sent to Faust, Azevedo & Wise (Toronto, ON) enclosing copy of letter dated Nov 14/95 sent to applicant | |
| 1995-11-14 | Correspondence received from, sent to Nelligan, Power (Ottawa, ON) to acknowledge receipt of material commencing a proceeding together with enclosed filing fee | |
| 1995-11-03 | $50.00 filing fee, receipt #31005 | Peter Haberman |
| 1995-11-03 | Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service, Completed on: 1995-11-03 | Peter Haberman |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Haberman, Peter | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Peixeiro, Mauricio | Respondent | Active |
| Peixeiro, Fernanda | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Haberman, Peter
Counsel
1500 - 390 BAY ST
TORONTO, Ontario
M5H 2Y2
Telephone: (416) 367-0202
FAX: (416) 367-1820
Agent
1900 - 66 Slater St
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5H1
Telephone: (613) 238-8080
FAX: (613) 238-2098
Party: Peixeiro, Mauricio
Counsel
528 COLLEGE ST
TORONTO, Ontario
M6G 1A6
Telephone: (416) 972-0900
FAX: (416) 972-1885
Agent
300 - 50 O'Connor St
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 232-7171
FAX: (613) 231-3191
Party: Peixeiro, Fernanda
Counsel
528 COLLEGE ST
TORONTO, Ontario
M6G 1A6
Telephone: (416) 972-0900
FAX: (416) 972-1885
Agent
300 - 50 O'Connor St
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 232-7171
FAX: (613) 231-3191
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
None.
Lower court rulings
Ontario Court of Justice (General Division)
94-CU-78839
Decision that Respondents' claim was statute barred
Court of Appeal for Ontario
C20298
Appeal allowed
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available