Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


30553

Minister of Justice v. Sheldon Blank

(Federal) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2006-09-12 Correspondence received from, Gowlings (by e-mail) re: typo in reasons Advocates' Society
2006-09-11 Appeal closed
2006-09-11 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties
2006-09-11 Judgment on appeal and notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties
2006-09-08 Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ Ba Bi De F Abe Cha, The appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A-233-03, dated September 8, 2004, 2004 FCA 287, heard on December 13, 2005, is dismissed. The Respondent shall be awarded his disbursements in this Court.
Dismissed, with costs
2006-01-12 Transcript received, (83 pages)
2005-12-13 Judgment reserved OR rendered with reasons to follow
2005-12-13 Hearing of the appeal, 2005-12-13, CJ Ba Bi De F Abe Cha
Judgment reserved
2005-12-13 Supplemental document, (14 copies of the Condensed Book served in Court) Advocates' Society
2005-12-13 Supplemental document, (14 copies of the Condensed Book served in Court) Information Commissioner of Canada
2005-12-13 Appellant's condensed book, Served in Court (14 copies) Minister of Justice
2005-12-13 Acknowledgement and consent for video taping of proceedings, from all parties
2005-12-08 Respondent's record, (Letter Form), Supplemental Record (rec'd by fax), Completed on: 2005-12-08 Sheldon Blank
2005-12-01 Notice of appearance, Luba Kowal, Malliha Wilson and Christopher P. Thompson will be appearing. Attorney General of Ontario
2005-11-29 Notice of appearance, Graham Garton, Q.C. and Christopher Rupar will be appearing. Minister of Justice
2005-11-25 Notice of appearance, Daniel Brunet and Raynold Langlois will be appearing. Information Commissioner of Canada
2005-11-15 Correspondence received from, Daniel Brunet re: clerical errors with respect to authorities referred to in their factum. (Sent to the judges Nov. 21/05) Information Commissioner of Canada
2005-11-14 Notice of appearance, Wendy Matheson and David Outerbridge will be present at the hearing. Advocates' Society
2005-11-14 Order by, Ma, FURTHER TO THE ORDERS of Major J. dated October 7 and 28, 2005, granting leave to intervene to the Attorney General of Ontario, the Advocates' Society and the Information Commissioner of Canada;
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT the said interveners are each granted permission to present oral argument not exceeding ten (10) minutes at the hearing of the appeal.
Granted
2005-11-10 Book of authorities, Completed on: 2005-11-10 Information Commissioner of Canada
2005-11-10 Intervener's factum, (CD rec'd Nov. 15/05), Completed on: 2005-11-15 Information Commissioner of Canada
2005-11-10 Book of authorities, (Vol. I and II), Completed on: 2005-11-10 Advocates' Society
2005-11-10 Intervener's factum, (Revised CD rec'd Dec. 2/05), Completed on: 2005-11-10 Advocates' Society
2005-11-10 Book of authorities, Completed on: 2005-11-10 Attorney General of Ontario
2005-11-10 Intervener's factum, Completed on: 2005-11-10 Attorney General of Ontario
2005-10-28 Order on motion for leave to intervene, (BY MAJOR J.)
2005-10-28 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Ma, UPON APPLICATION by the Information Commissioner of Canada for an extension of time to apply for leave to intervene and for leave to intervene in the above appeal;
AND THE MATERIAL FILED having been read;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
The motion for an extension of time to apply for leave to intervene and for leave to intervene of the applicant, Information Commissioner of Canada, is granted and the applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length on or before November 10, 2005.
The request to be served with a complete copy of any and all proceedings, materials and documents on appeal, including any confidential material is dismissed, without prejudice to the right of the intervener under the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada to request copies of factums at his expense.
The request to present oral argument is deferred to a date following receipt and consideration of the written arguments of the parties and the interveners.
The intervener shall not be entitled to raise new issues or to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties.
Pursuant to Rule 59(1)(a) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada the intervener shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by its intervention.
Allowed in part
2005-10-27 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, Ma
2005-10-20 Reply to the motion for leave to intervene, (bookform), Completed on: 2005-10-20 Information Commissioner of Canada
2005-10-14 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (book form), Completed on: 2005-10-14 Minister of Justice
2005-10-12 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from S. Blank (by fax) re: Information Commissioner of Canada's motion, Completed on: 2005-10-12 Sheldon Blank
2005-10-07 Order on motion for leave to intervene
2005-10-07 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Ma, The motion for leave to intervene of the applicant, the Attorney General of Ontario, is granted and the applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length on or before November 10, 2005.
The motion for an extension of time to apply for leave to intervene and for leave to intervene of the applicant, The Advocates' Society, is granted and the applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length on or before November 10, 2005.
The requests to present oral argument is deferred to a date following receipt and consideration of the written arguments of the parties and the interveners.
The interveners shall not be entitled to raise new issues or to adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties.
Pursuant to Rule 59(1)(a) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada the interveners shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by their interventions.
Granted
2005-10-06 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, Ma
2005-10-04 Motion for leave to intervene, (bookform) (joint with an extension of time), Completed on: 2005-10-04 Information Commissioner of Canada
2005-10-03 Reply to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), David Outerbridge dated Oct. 3/05, Completed on: 2005-10-03 Advocates' Society
2005-10-03 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from S. Blank (by fax), Completed on: 2005-10-03 Sheldon Blank
2005-09-28 Appeal perfected for hearing
2005-09-26 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from Christopher Rupar dated Sept. 26/05, Completed on: 2005-09-26 Minister of Justice
2005-09-23 Respondent's book of authorities, Completed on: 2005-09-23 Sheldon Blank
2005-09-23 Respondent's factum, CD rec'd Oct. 5/05, Completed on: 2005-10-05 Sheldon Blank
2005-09-22 Motion for leave to intervene, (joint with an exrension of time) (bookform), Completed on: 2005-09-22 Advocates' Society
2005-09-08 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), from Christopher Rupar dated Sept. 8/05, Completed on: 2005-09-08 Minister of Justice
2005-08-31 Motion for leave to intervene, (book form), Completed on: 2005-08-31 Attorney General of Ontario
2005-08-15 Notice of hearing sent to parties
2005-08-11 Appeal hearing scheduled, 2005-12-13, Previously Jan. 10/06
Judgment reserved
2005-08-04 Appellant's record, Vol. I & II, Completed on: 2005-08-04 Minister of Justice
2005-08-04 Appellant's book of authorities, 12 copies recvd - 2 other copies requested Aug 17th (recvd Aug 17th), Completed on: 2005-08-04 Minister of Justice
2005-08-04 Appellant's factum, CD recvd/Amended CD rec'd Aug. 31/05, Completed on: 2005-08-04 Minister of Justice
2005-06-10 Correspondence received from, Mr. Blank with answered questionnaire Sheldon Blank
2005-05-16 Notice of appeal, Completed on: 2005-05-16 Minister of Justice
2005-05-03 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, Mr. Sheldon Blank re: questionnaire
2005-05-03 Letter advising the parties of tentative hearing date and filing deadlines (Leave granted)
2005-04-22 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2005-04-21 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A-233-03, dated September 8, 2004, is granted.
Granted
2005-02-28 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, Ma F Abe
2004-12-10 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, Completed on: 2004-12-16 Minister of Justice
2004-12-09 Correspondence received from, C. Rupar dated December 10, 2004 (fax copy) re: enclosing an amended order of FCA Minister of Justice
2004-12-08 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (proof of delivery received on Dec. 14, 2004), Completed on: 2004-12-08 Sheldon Blank
2004-11-26 Correspondence received from, C. Rupar (by fax) re: confirming leave application does not contain sealed material Minister of Justice
2004-11-25 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal
2004-11-12 Book of authorities Minister of Justice
2004-11-08 Application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2004-11-08 Minister of Justice
2004-10-04 Notice of application for leave to appeal Minister of Justice

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Minister of Justice Appellant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Blank, Sheldon Respondent Active

Other parties

Other parties
Name Role Status
Attorney General of Ontario Intervener Active
Advocates' Society Intervener Active
Information Commissioner of Canada Intervener Active

Counsel

Party: Minister of Justice

Counsel
Christopher M. Rupar
Graham Garton, Q.C.
Attorney General of Canada
Bank of Canada Building - East Tower
234 Wellington Street, Room 1212
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
Telephone: (613) 941-2351
FAX: (613) 954-1920
Email: christopher.rupar@justice.gc.ca

Party: Blank, Sheldon

This party is not represented by counsel.

Party: Attorney General of Ontario

Counsel
Luba A. Kowal
Malliha Wilson
Christopher P. Thompson
Attorney General of Ontario
720 Bay Street
8th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 2K1
Telephone: (416) 326-4576
FAX: (416) 326-4181
Email: luba.kowal@jus.gov.on.ca
Agent
Robert E. Houston, Q.C.
Burke-Robertson
70 Gloucester Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0A2
Telephone: (613) 566-2058
FAX: (613) 235-4430
Email: rhouston@burkerobertson.com

Party: Advocates' Society

Counsel
Wendy Matheson
David Outerbridge
Torys
79 Wellington Street West
Suite 3000
Toronto, Ontario
M5K 1N2
Telephone: (416) 865-8133
FAX: (416) 865-7380
Email: wmatheson@torys.com
Agent
Brian A. Crane, Q.C.
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
2600 - 160 Elgin St
Box 466 Station D
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 233-1781
FAX: (613) 563-9869
Email: brian.crane@gowlingwlg.com

Party: Information Commissioner of Canada

Counsel
Daniel Brunet
Raynold Langlois, Q.C.
Information Commissioner of Canada
Place de Ville - Tower B
112 Kent Street, 22nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 1H3
Telephone: (613) 943-2411
FAX: (613) 947-5252

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

Sheldon Blank was a director of a company that operated a pulp and paper mill in Winnipeg. He was charged with offences under the Fisheries Act and the Pulp and Paper Effluent Regulations. Eight charges were quashed in 1997 and the remaining five were quashed in 2001. In 2002, the Crown laid new charges but, after a trial date was set, the Crown stayed the proceedings and informed Mr. Blank that the prosecutions would not be reinstated. The Respondent sued the federal government for fraud, conspiracy, perjury and abuse of power. Pursuant to the Access to Information Act, Sheldon Blank requested access to government records related to the alleged offences and the prosecutions. 2297 pages of material were released but approximately 1500 pages were withheld as exempt from disclosure pursuant to ss. 13(1), 19(1), 20(1), 21(1) and 23 of the Act. Mr. Blank sought judicial review of the decision not to release the 1500 pages of material. On November 19, 2002, the reviewing judge held that litigation privilege only protects documents until the litigation has ended. On February 26, 2003, he made decisions in respect of the bulk of the documents, finding that some should be disclosed and others withheld. He reserved on records alleged to contain evidence of obstruction, perjury, extortion, conspiracy and trespass on the part of government officials or their counsel. On April 17, 2003, the reviewing judge held that the reserved records contained no evidence of the alleged offences and he upheld Mr. Blank’s claims that these records are exempt from disclosure. Sheldon Blank appealed and the Minister of Justice cross-appealed. The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, save for the question of severance. The cross-appeal was dismissed.

Lower court rulings

April 17, 2003
Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division

T-2073-00

Respondent's application for judicial review pursuant s. 41 of the Access Information Act allowed in part

September 8, 2004
Federal Court of Appeal

A-233-03

Respondent's appeal allowed in part; Applicant's cross-appeal dismissed, Létourneau J.A. dissenting; Matter referred back to the Federal Court, Trial Division

December 1, 2004
Federal Court of Appeal

A-233-03

The effect of the judgment of the Federal Court of appeal on the cross-appeal, dated September 8, 2004, is suspended until the day of judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada on the application for leave to appeal.

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-05-13